Chandigarh · 1920 · Act 1
THE PUNJAB LIMITATION (CUSTOM) ACT, 1920
In forceFull text
This Act is not split into sections here yet, so this is the full text read from its official PDF. Older scans can carry reading errors: check the PDF before you quote it, and for tables and schedules.
1920 : Pb. Act I.] trmrrarion (custom) 599
THE PUNJAB LIMITTATION (CUSTOM) ACT, 1920
CONTENTS.
SECTIONS.
G1
b
&
OO
bh
o
BH
Short title and extent.
Repeal.
Definitions.
Savings. :
Dismissal of suits of the description specified in the
Act if instituted after the period of limitation therein
prescribed has expired.
Provision for suits for which the period prescribed is
shorter than that prescribed by the Indian Limitation
Act or the Punjab Limitation Act.
Limitation on suits for possession where no declaratory
decree has been obtained.
Benefit of declaratory decree.
Schedule.
1920 : Pb. Act I] rumrrarion (custom) 601
THE PUNJAB LIMITATION (CUSTOM) ACT, 1920.
Punjab Act I of 1920.
(Received the assent of the Lieutenant-Governor of the -
Punjab on the 5th Apri pril, 1920, and that
oo otal on the 2nd May, 1920, and a fa
published in the Punjab Gazette of the 28th May,
1920.]
+ £ |] 2 3 4.
Yi i 7
ear No. Short title whether repealed or otherwise
affected by legislation
1920 : I The Puntab Lim'tation| Amended by the Indian Inde-
(Custom) Act, 1920 pendence (Adaptation of Bengal
and Punjab Acts) Order of 1948
(G. G. O. 40)
Amended by the Adaptatio of
Laws (Third Amendment) Order
of 1951 ,
Extended to the territories, which
immediately before the Ist Nov-
ember, 1956, were comprised in
the State of Patiala and East
Punjab States Union, by Punjab
Act 43 of 1960°.
Amended by the Punjab Reorga-
nisation (Chandigarh) (Adaptation
of Laws on States and Concurrent
Subjects) Order, 1968-
An Act to amend and consolidate the law governing the
limitation of suits relating to alienations of
ancestral immovable property and appointments
of heirs by persons who follow custom in ‘[Punjab].
Whereas it is expedient to amend and consolidate the
law governing the limitation of suits relating to alienations
of ancestral immoveable property and appointments of
heirs by persons who follow custom in *[Punjab];
And whereas the previous sanction of the Governor-
General has been accorded under section 79(2) of the
Government of India Act, 1915, to the passing of this Act;
It is hereby enacted as follows :— ae
1. (1) This Act may be called the Punjab Limitation
(Custom) Act, 1920.0
a aan, ins
iFor Statement of Objects and Reasons, see Punja azette, ¢
Part v aes 383—87, ond for Select Committee's report, see ibid, 1920,
Part V, pages 5—7 and for Proceedings 1n Council, see ibid, 1919, Part
V, pages 495—28 ; and ibid, 1920, Part V, peges 119—25
2See Punjab Gazette, 1920, Part V, pages 253—55. |
Punjab Government
3For Statement of Objects and Reasons, see
e 2010.
Gazette (Extraordinary), 1960, pag ‘ . .
“aSubstituted for the words “Eest Punjab” (which had. been insert-
ed for the word “Punjab” by_the Indian - Independence (Adaptation of
Bengal and Punjab Acts) Order, 1948) by the Adaptation of Lews
(Third Amendment) Order, 1951.
Short title and
extent.
oN
602 LIMITATION (CUSTOM) [1920 : Ph. Act ]
(2) It extends "|Union Territory of Chandigarh),
Repeal, 2. The Punjab Limitation (Ancestral Land Aliena.
i Punjay tion) Act, 1900, is hereby repealed.
Act I
Definitions. 3. In this Act—
“Alienation” includes any testamentary disposition
of property.
“Appointment of an heir” includes any adoption’
made or purporting to be made according to
custom.
Savings, 4. This Act shall not effect any suit pending in am
court on the date on which this Act comes into force,
Dismissal _ of 5. Subject to the provisions contained in section 4 suits of the des- criptions speci. 0 20 (inclusive), of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, fied in the act and notwithstanding anything to the contrary contain- coat — ed in the first schedule of the said Act, every suit, of mitation herein ANY description specified in the schedule annexed to prescribed has this Act, instituted after the period of limitation pres- expired, cribed therefor in the schedule shall be dismissed,
although limitation has not been set up as a defence.
ame hen 6. Notwithstanding anything herein contained,
the period pres- ANY suit for which the period of limitation prescribed
ended is shorter by this Act is shorter than the period of limitation
Soda is ‘Ws prescribed by the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, or by
Indian Limita, the Punjab Limitation (Ancestral. Land Alienation)
a Timi “Ct, 1900, may be instituted within the period of one
bon dnd: =" year next after the commencement of this Act or
within the period prescribed for such suit by the
Indian Limitation Act, 1908, or by the Punjab Limita-
tion (Ancestral Land Alienation) Act, 1900, which
ever period expires first.
Limitation on 7, Subject to the provisions of section 6— suits for posses-
a" . ‘al =im- sion where no de- (a) No suit for the possession of ancest1 . - claratory decree
d that an hast been: chiar moveable property on the groun
ed. alienation of such property or the apne
ment of an heir is not binding on the
- ———_—_——_
1Substituted for the word “Punjab” by the Punjeb Reorganisation
jects (Chendigarh) (Adaptation of Lews on State and Concurrent Subject 2
Order, 1968. ae
> _
1920 : Pb. Act L.| Limrrarion (custom) 603
plaintiff according to custom shall lie if a
suit for a declaration that the alienation
or appointment of an heir is not so binding
would be time-barred, unless a suit for such
a declaration has been instituted within the
period prescribed by the schedule.
(b) No suit for the possession of ancestral im-
moveable property by a plaintiff on the
ground that he is as heir appointed in
accordance with custom entitled thereto
shall lie if a suit for a declaration that his
alleged appointment as heir was validly
made according to custom would be time-
barred, unless a suit for such a declaration
has been instituted within the period
prescribed by the schedule.
8. When any person obtains a decree declaring
that an alienation of ancestral immovable property or
the appointment of an heir is not binding on him
according to custom, the decree shall ensure for the
benefit of all persons entitled to impeach the aliena-
tion or the appointment of an heir.
604
SCHEDULE
LIMITATION (CUSTOM) [1920 : Ph, Agy I
oes
Description of suit
1. A suit for a declaration that
an alienation of ancestral
immoveable property will
not, according to custom,
be binding on the plaintiff
after the death of the
alienor (if the alienor is a
female) afte: her death or
forfeiture of her interest in
the property
2. A suit for Possession of an- ceéstral immoveable pro- Perty w ich has been alie- nated on the ground that the alienation is not bind. Ingon the plaintiff accord- Ing to custom —
(a) if no declaratory decree
of the nature referred ‘o in article 4 jg
obtained
(b) if
decree js obtained
such declaratory
Period
ol .
limitation
6 years
6 years
3 years
Time from which Pertod
begins to run
Firstly.—If the alienation is by Aregisterd deed, (he date of registration of sueh (leed,
Secondly.—If the alienation is not by a registered deed—
(a) if an entry regarding the alienation in the Register of Mutations has been altested by a Revenue Officer under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, the date on which the - entry is attested :
(8) if such entry has Not been attested, the date on Which the alienee takes Physical possession of the
whole or any Part of the
Property alienated in Pursuance of such aliena-
tion ;
(c) in all other cases, the
date on which the aliena-
tion comes to the know-
ledge of the plaintiff.
As above
The date on which the right to sue accrues or the date on
which the declaratory decree
is obtained, whichever is later.
1920 : Pb. Act I.) uimiration (cusTOM ) 605
\
bees Period | Time from whieh period
limitation
_ |
3. A suit fi 1 | | a 3, A suit fora eclaration that | & years .. | Vhe date on which the alleged
a yo aed appointment of appointment of an hier
8 invalid as beinig becomes known to the plain-
opposed to custom or jn tiff.
fact Never took place
4. Asuil for possession of an-
cestral immovable property
onthe ground that an ap-
pointment of an heir is in-
valid or never in fact took
place—
(2) if no declaratory deeree | 6 years .. | The date on which the alleged
of the nature referred to appointment of an heir
IN article 3 is obtained; comes known to the plaintiff.
(b) if such declaratory deeree | 3 years .. | The date on which the right to
is obtained Sue accrues, or the date on
which the declaratory decree”
is obtained, whichever is later,
5. A suit for a declaration that | 6 years .. | The date when the right of the
an alleged appointment of alleged appointed heir are
an heir was validly made interfered with.
according to cutom
6. A suitfor possesrion of an-
ces'ra] immoveabie property
by plaintiff on the ground
that he is an heir appoint
in accordance with custom
entitled thereto—
(a) if no declaratory decrce | 5 years .. | The date when his rights as
of the nature referred to such heir are interfered with.
in article 5 is obtained ; ,
(b) if such declaratory | 8 years .. | The date ofthe death of the
decree is obtained person making the appoint-
ment or if(such person is a
female) of her death or of the
forfeiture of her interest ip
the property or the date on
which the declaratory decree
is obtained whichever is later.
ares