THE COURT-FEES ACT, 1870

1 THE COURT-FEES ACT, 1870 __________ ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS __________ CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title. Extent of Act. Commencement of Act. 1A. Definition of “appropriate Government”. 2. [Repealed.]. CHAPTER II FEES IN THE HIGH COURTS AND IN THE COURTS OF SMALL CAUSES AT THE PRESIDENCY-TOWNS 3. Levy of fees in High Courts on their original sides. Levy of fees in Presidency Small Cause Courts. 4. Fees on documents filed, etc., in High Courts in their extraordinary jurisdiction. In their appellate jurisdiction. As courts of reference and revision. 5. Procedure in case of difference as to necessity or amount of fee. CHAPTER III FEES IN OTHER COURTS AND IN PUBLIC OFFICES 6. Fees on documents filed, etc., in Mufassal Courts or in public offices. 7. Computation of fees payable in certain suits. (i) for money. (ii) for maintenance and annuities . (iii) for other movable property having a market-value. (iv) (a) for movable property of no market-value. (b) to enforce a right to share in joint family property. (c) for a declaratory decree and consequential relief. (d) for an injunction. (e) for easements. (f) for accounts. (v) for possession of land, houses and gardens. Proviso as to Bombay Presidency. for houses and gardens . (vi) to enforce a right of pre-emption. (vii) for interest of assignee of land-revenue. 2 SECTIONS (viii) to set aside an attachment. (ix) to redeem. to foreclose. (x) for specific performance . (xi) between landlord and tenant. 8. Fee on memorandum of appeal against order relating to compensation. 9. Power to ascertain net profits or market-value. 10. Procedure where net profits or market-value wrongly estimated. 11. Procedure in suits for mesne profits or account when amount decreed exceeds amount claimed. 12. Decision of questions as to valuation. 13. Refund of fee paid on memorandum of appeal. 14. Refund of fee on application for review of judgment. 15. Refund where Court reverses or modifies its former decision on ground of mistake. 16. Refund of fee. 17. Multifarious suits. 18. Written examinations of complainants. 19. Exemption of certain documents. CHAPTER IIIA PROBATES, LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION AND CERTIFICATES OF ADMINISTRATION 19A. Relief where too high a court-fee has been paid. 19B. Relief where debts due from a deceased person have been paid out of his estate. 19C. Relief in case of several grants. 19D. Probates declared valid as to trust-property though not covered by court-fee. 19E. Provision for case where too low a court-fee has been paid on probates, etc. 19F. Administrator to give proper security before letters stamped under section 19E. 19G. Executors, etc., not paying full court-fee on probates, etc., within six months after discovery of under-payment. 19H. Notice of applications for probate or letters of administration to be given to Revenue- authorities, and procedure thereon. 19I. Payment of court-fees in respect of probates and letters of administration. 19J. Recovery of penalties, etc. 19K. Sections 6 and 28 not to apply to probates or letters of administration. CHAPTER IV PROCESS-FEES 20. Rules as to cost of processes. Confirmation and publication of rules. 3 SECTIONS 21. Tables of process-fees. 22. Number of peons in District and subordinate Courts. Number of peons in Mufassal Small cause Courts. 23. Number of peons in Revenue Courts. 24. [Repealed.]. CHAPTER V OF THE MODE OF LEVYING FEES 25. Collection of fees by stamps. 26. Stamps to be impressed or adhesive. 27. Rules for supply, number, renewal and keeping accounts of stamps. 28. Stamping documents inadvertently received. 29. Amended document. 30. Cancellation of stamp. CHAPTER VI MISCELLANEOUS 31. [Repealed.]. 32. [Repealed.]. 33. Admission in criminal cases of documents for which proper fee has not been paid. 34. Sale of stamps. 35. Power to reduce or remit fees. 36. Saving of fees to certain officers of High Courts. SCHEDULE I.— AD VALOREM FEES TABLE OF RATES OF AD VALOREM FEES LEVIABLE ON THE INSTITUTION OF SUITS. SCHEDULE II. — FIXED FEES SCHEDULE III. — FORM OF VALUATION (TO BE USED WITH SUCH MODIFICATIONS, IF ANY, AS MAY BE NECESSARY) ANNEXURE A.— VALUATION OF THE MOVABLE AND IMMOVABLE PROPERTY OF DECEASED. ANNEXURE B.—SCHEDULE OF DEBTS, ETC. 4 THE COURT-FEES ACT, 1870 ACT NO. 7 OF 18701 [11th March, 1870.] CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title.—This Act may be called the Court-fees Act, 1870. Extent of Act.—It extends to the whole of India except 2[the territories which, immediately before the 1st November, 1956, were comprised in Part B States]; Commencement of Act.—And it shall come into force on the first day of April, 1870. 3[1A. Definition of “appropriate Government”.—In this Act “the appropriate Government” means, in relation to fees or stamps relating to documents presented or to be presented before any officer serving under the Central Government, that Government, and in relation to any other fees or stamps, the State Government.] 42. [“Chief Controlling Revenue-authority” defined.] Rep. by the A. O. 1937. 1. It has been declared inapplicable to proceedings before officers making a settlement, and in certain other cases under the Sonthal Parganas Settlement Regulation, 1872 (Reg. 3 of 1872), s. 8, as amended by the Sonthal Parganas Justice and Laws Regulation, 1899 (Reg. 3 of 1899). It has been extended to and brought into force in Dadra and Nagar Haveli by Reg. 6 of 1963, s. 2 and Sch. I (w.e.f. 1-7-1965), to Goa, Daman and Diu by Reg. 11 of 1963, s. 3 and Sch., and to the whole of Union territory of Lakshadweep by Reg. 8 of 1863, s. 3 and Sch., with modification (w.e.f. 1-10-1967). It has been amended in— Ajmer-Merwara by Act 31 of 1930; Assam by Assam Acts 4 of 1922, 3 of 1932, 18 of 1947, 8 of 1950, 27 of 1954, 22 of 1955, 3 of 1958, 19 of 1958, 12 of 1960 and 28 of 1972; Bengal by Bengal Acts 3 of 1898, 4 of 1922, 6 of 1922, 7 of 1935, 11 of 1935 and 3 of 1941; Bihar by Bihar Acts 17 of 1939 and 7 of 1958. Bihar and Orissa by B. & O. Act 2 of 1922; Bombay by Bombay Acts 2 of 1932 and 15 of 1943; C.P. by C.P. Act 16 of 1935; C.P. and Berar by C.P. and Berar Acts 9 of 1938, 16 of 1940, 9 of 1941, 5 of 1945 and 7 of 1948 and M.P. Acts 4 and 38 of 1950, 13 and 22 of 1951 and 9 of 1953; Himachal Pradesh by H.P. Act 4 of 1952; Madras by Madras Acts 5 of 1922 and 17 of 1945; Orissa by Orissa Acts 5 of 1939, 4 of 1945, 13 of 1957, 12 of 1974 and 55 of 1975; Punjab by Act 17 of 1887 and Punjab Acts 7 of 1922, 1 of 1942, E.P. Act 26 of 1949 and Pun. Act 31 of 1953, 19 of 1957, 20 of 1960 and 9 of 1979; U.P. by U.P. Acts 12 of 1922, 3 of 1933, 2 of 1936, 19 of 1938, 9 of 1941, 14 of 1942, 8 of 1943, 5 of 1944, 14 of 1948, 28 of 1957, 10 of 1959, 34 of 1970 and 9 of 1975; Andaman and Nicobar Islands by Reg. 2 of 1957; Meghalaya by Meghalaya Acts 2 of 1973 and 5 of 1973; Madhya Pradesh by Madhya Pradesh Acts 24 of 1975 and 4 of 1976; Delhi by Central Act 28 of 1967; and Haryana by Haryana Acts 11 of 1974 and 22 of 1974. The Act has been repealed in its application to Bombay area and Coorg district of Mysore by Mysore Act 16 of 1958. It has been repealed in part in partially excluded areas in Madras and Koraput by Madras Reg. 6 of 1940 and Orissa Reg. 7 of 1943, respectively. 2. Subs. by the Adaptation of Laws (No. 2) Order, 1956, for “Part B States”. 3. Ins. by the A.O. 1937. 4. The Original s. 2 relating to repeal of enactments was rep. by the Repealing Act, 1870 (14 of 1870). A section defining “Chief Controlling Revenue-authority” was added by s. 2 of the Court-fees (Amendment) Act, 1901 (10 of 1901), and was slightly amended by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1917 (24 of 1917). For the definition of the “Chief Controlling Revenue-authority” see now the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897), s. 3 (10). The A.O. 1937 rep. s. 2 as in force elsewhere than in Bengal. In that Province the secti on subs. by the Court-fees (Bengal Amendment) Act, 1935 (Ben. 7 of 1935), s. 3 contains definitions of “appeal”, “Chief Controlling Revenue -authority”, “Collector” and “Suit”. 5 STATE AMENDMENT Orissa Amendment of section 2 of Act (7 of 1870).—For section 2 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, hereinafter called the principal Act, the following section shall be substituted:— “2. Definition.—In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,— (1) ‘appeal’ includes a cross objection; (2) ‘suit’ includes an appeal from a decree except in section 8-A.” [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 3] CHAPTER II FEES IN THE HIGH COURTS AND IN THE COURTS OF SMALL CAUSES AT THE PRESIDENCY-TOWNS 3. Levy of fees in High Courts on their original sides.—The fees payable for the time being to the clerks and officers (other than the Sheriffs and attorneys) of 1[the 2[High Courts other than those of Kerala, Mysore and Rajasthan]], or chargeable in each of such Courts under No. 11 of the first, and Nos. 7, 12, 14, 3*** 20 and 21 of the second, schedule to this Act annexed; Levy of fees in Presidency Small Cause Courts.—and the fees for the time being chargeable in the Courts of Small Causes at the 4presidency-towns, and their several offices; shall be collected in manner hereinafter appearing. 4. Fees on documents filed, etc., in High Courts, in their extraordinary jurisdiction.—No document of any of the kinds specified in the first or second schedule to this Act annexed, as chargeable with fees, shall be filed, exhibited or recorded in, or shall be received or furnished by, any of the said High Courts in any case coming before such Court in the exercise of its extraordinary original civil jurisdiction; or in the exercise of its extraordinary original criminal jurisdiction; In their appellate jurisdiction.—or in the exercise of its jurisdiction as regards appeals from the 5[judgments (other than judgments passed in the exercise of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the Court) of one] or more Judges of the said Court, or of a Division Court; or in the exercise of its jurisdiction as regards appeals from the Courts subject to its superintendence; As Courts of reference and revision.—or in the exercise of its jurisdiction as a Court of reference or revision; unless in respect of such document there be paid a fee of an amount not less than that indicated by either of the said schedules as the proper fee for such document. STATE AMENDMENT Uttar Pradesh Amendment of section 4 of Act VII of 1870.—In the marginal heading to the first clause of section 4 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, as amended from time to time in its application to Uttar Pradesh for the words “in the High Courts in their ordinary or extraordinary jurisdiction “ shall be substitution. [Vide Uttar Pradesh Act X of 1959, s. 2] 1. Subs by the A.O.1950, for “the Courts which are High Courts for the purposes of the Government of India Act, 1935”. 2. Subs. by the Adaptation of Laws (No. 2) Order, 1956, for “High Courts for Part A States”. 3. The number “16” rep. by Act 12 of 1891. 4. See the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 (15 of 1882), Ch. X. 5. Subs. by Act 19 of 1922, s. 2, for “judgment of two”. 6 Amendment of section 4 of Act VII of 1870.—In section 4 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, as amended from time to time in its application to Uttar Pradesh— (1) for the words “any of the said High Courts”, the words “the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad” shall be substituted; (2) between the words “in the exercise of its” and the words “extraordinary original civil jurisdiction”, the words “ordinary or” shall be inserted; (3) between the words “in the exercise of its” and the words “extraordinary original criminal jurisdiction”, the words “ordinary or” shall be inserted; and (4) after the sub-paragraph “or in the exercise of its jurisdiction as a Court of reference or revision”, the following sub-paragraphs shall be added— “Or in the exercise of its jurisdiction to issue direction the exercise of nation, orders or writs under the jurisdiction to issue Constitution of India; Or in the exercise of jurisdiction in any other in the exercise of any other jurisdiction matter.” [Vide Uttar Pradesh Act X of 1959, s. 3] 5. Procedure in case of difference as to necessity or amount of fee.—When any difference arises between the officer whose duty it is to see that any fee is paid under this Chapter and any suitor or attorney, as to the necessity of paying a fee or the amount thereof, the question shall, when the difference arises in any of the said High Courts, be referred to the taxing-officer, whose decision thereon shall be final, except when the question is, in his opinion, one of general importance, in which case he shall refer it to the final decision of the Chief Justice of such High Court, or of such Judge of the High Court as the Chief Justice shall appoint either generally or specially in this behalf. When any such difference arises in any of the said Courts of Small Causes, the question shall be referred to the Clerk of the Court, whose decision thereon shall be final, except when the question is, in his opinion, one of general importance, in which case he shall refer it to the final decision of the first Judge of such Court. The Chief Justice shall declare who shall be taxing-officer within the meaning of the first paragraph of this section. CHAPTER III FEES IN OTHER COURTS AND IN PUBLIC OFFICES 6. Fees on documents filed, etc., in Mufassal Courts or in public offices.—Except in the Courts hereinbefore mentioned, no document of any of the kinds specified as chargeable in the first or second schedule to this Act annexed shall be filed, exhibited or recorded in any Court of Justice, or shall be received or furnished by any public officer, unless in respect of such document there be paid a fee of an amount not less than that indicated by either of the said schedules as the proper fee for such document. STATE AMENDMENT Orissa Amendment of section 6 of Act (7 of 1870).--Section 6 of the principal Act shall be re-numbered as sub-section (1) of section 6 and , after the said sub-section, the following sub-section shall be inserted:— “(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the Provincial Government may, by notification, direct that a copy of a document, specified as chargeable in Schedules I and II to this Act annexed, shall be furnished by a public officer without payment of the fee indicated by either of the said Schedules as the proper fee for such copy and the copy so furnished shall be chargeable with the requisite fee only when it is filed, exhibited or recorded in any Court of justice or received by a public officer as mentioned in sub-section (1).” [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 4] 7 STATE AMENDMENT Uttar Pradesh Amendment of section 6 of Act (7 of 1870).—In section 6 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 as amended in its application to Uttar Pradesh, hereinafter, in this Chapter referred to as the principal Act,— (a) in sub-section (1), in the first proviso, for the words “the United” Provinces Tenancy Act, 1939, or the United Provinces Land Revenue Act, 1901”, the words “any law relation to land tenures or land revenue shall be substituted; (b) in sub-section (6), for the words “Chief Inspector of Stamps” the words “Commission of Stamps” shall be substituted. [Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 6 of 1980, s. 2] Amendment of section 6-A.—In section 6-A of the principal Act, in sub-section (3), for the words “Chief Inspector of Stamps”, the words “Commissioners of Stamps” shall be substituted. [Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 6 of 1980, s. 3] Amendment of section 6-B.—In section 6-B of the principal Act, in sub-section (1), for the words “Chief Inspector of Stamps”, the words “Commissioner of Stamps” shall be substituted. [Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 6 of 1980, s. 4] 7. Computation of fees payable in certain suits.—The amount of fee payable under this Act in the suits next hereinafter mentioned shall be computed as follows:— for money.—(i) In suits for money (including suits for damages or compensation, or arrears of maintenance, of annuities, or of other sums payable periodically)—according to the amount claimed: for maintenance and annuities.—(ii) In suits for maintenance and annuities or other sums payable periodically—according to the value of the subject-matter of the suit, and such value shall be deemed to be ten times the amount claimed to be payable for one year: for other movable property having a market-value.—(iii) In suits for movable property other than money, where the subject-matter has a market-value—according to such value at the date of presenting the plaint: (iv) In suits— for movable property of no market-value.—(a) for movable property where the subject- matter has no market-value, as, for instance, in the case of documents relating to title, to enforce a right to share in joint family property.—(b) to enforce the right to share in any property on the ground that it is joint family property, for a declaratory decree and consequential relief.—(c) to obtain a declaratory decree or order, where consequential relief is prayed, for an injunction.—(d) to obtain an injunction, for easements.—(e) for a right to some benefit (not herein otherwise provided for) to arise out of land, and for accounts.—(f) for accounts— according to the amount at which the relief sought is valued in the plaint or memorandum of appeal: 8 In all such suits the plaintiff shall state the amount at which he values the relief sought 1***: for possession of land, houses and gardens.—(v) In suits for the possession of land, houses and gardens—according to the value of the subject-matter; and such value shall be deemed to be— where the subject-matter is land, and— (a) where the land forms an entire estate, or a definite share of an estate, paying annual revenue to Government, or forms part of such an estate and is recorded in the Collector’s register as separately assessed with such revenue, and such revenue is permanently settled— ten times the revenue so payable: (b) where the land forms an entire estate, or a definite share of an estate, paying annual revenue to Government, or forms part of such estate and is recorded as aforesaid; and such revenue is settled, but not permanently— five times the revenue so payable: (c) where the land pays no such revenue, or has been partially exempted from such payment, or is charged with any fixed payment in lieu of such revenue, and nett profits have arisen from the land during the year next before the date of presenting the plaint— fifteen times such nett profits: but where no such nett profits have arisen therefrom— the amount at which the Court shall estimate the land with reference to the value of similar land in the neighbourhood : (d) where the land forms part of an estate paying revenue to Government, but is not a definite share of such estate and is not separately assessed as above-mentioned—the market-value of the land: Proviso as to Bombay Presidency.—Provided that, in the 2territories subject to the Governor of Bombay in Council, the value of the land shall be deemed to be— (1) where the land is held on settlement for a period not exceeding thirty years and pays the full assessment to Government—a sum equal to five times the survey-assessment; (2) where the land is held on a permanent settlement, or on a settlement for any period exceeding thirty years, and pays the full assessment to Government—a sum equal to ten times the survey-assessment; and (3) where the whole or any part of the annual survey-assessment is remitted—a sum computed under paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of this proviso, as the case may be, in addition to ten times the assessment, or the portion of assessment, so remitted. Explanation.—The word “estate”, as used in this paragraph, means any land subject to the payment of revenue, for which the proprietor or a farmer or raiyat shall have executed a separate engagement to Government, or which, in the absence of such engagement, shall have been separately assessed with revenue: 1. The words “and the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, section thirty-one, shall apply as if, for the word ‘claim’, the words ‘relief sought’, were substituted” omitted by Act 12 of 1891, s. 3 and the First Schedule. 2. See para.8 of the A.O. 1937. In view of this provision the expression “Governor of Bombay in Council” has been left unmodified. 9 for houses and gardens.—(e) Where the subject-matter is a house or garden according to the market-value of the house or garden: to enforce a right of pre-emption.—(vi) In suits to enforce a right of pre-emption-according to the value (computed in accordance with paragraph (v) of this section) of the land, house or garden in respect of which the right is claimed: for interest of assignee of land revenue.—(vii) In suits for the interest of an assignee of land revenue—fifteen times his net profits as such for the year next before the date of presenting the plaint: to set aside an attachment.—(viii) In suits to set aside an attachment of land or of an interest in land or revenue—according to the amount for which the land or interest was attached: Provided that, where such amount exceeds the value of the land or interest, the amount of fee shall be computed as if the suit were for the possession of such land or interest. to redeem.—(ix) In suits against a mortgagee for the recovery of the property mortgaged. to foreclose.—and in suits by a mortgagee to foreclose the mortgage, or, where the mortgage is made by conditional sale, to have the sale declared absolute— according to the principal money expressed to be secured by the instrument of mortgage : for specific performance.—(x) In suits for specific performance— (a) of a contract of sale—according to the amount of the consideration : (b) of a contract of mortgage—according to the amount agreed to be secured : (c) of a contract of lease—according to the aggregate amount of the fine or premium (if any) and of the rent agreed to be paid during the first year of the term : (d) of an award—according to the amount or value of the property in dispute : between landlord and tenant.— (xi) In the following suits between landlord and tenant:— (a) for the delivery by a tenant of the counterpart of a lease, (b) to enhance the rent of a tenant having a right of occupancy, (c) for the delivery by a landlord of a lease, 1[(cc) for the recovery of immovable property from a tenant, including a tenant holding over after the determination of a tenancy,] (d) to contest a notice of ejectment, (e) to recover the occupancy of 2[immovable property] from which a tenant has been illegally ejected by the landlord, and (f) for abatement of rent— according to the amount of the rent of the 2[immovable property] to which the suit refers, payable for the year next before the date of presenting the plaint. STATE AMENDMENT Orissa Amendment of section 7 of Act (7 of 1870).—In section 7 of the principal Act, for the words “in the suits next hereinafter mentioned” the words “in the suits next hereinafter mentioned except suits for relief under section 14 of the Religious Endowments Act, 1863, or under section 91 or section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908”, shall be substituted. [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 5] 1. Ins. by Act 6 of 1905, s. 2 (1). 2. Subs. by s. 2 (2), ibid., for “land”. 10 Amendment of section 7 of Act (7 of 1870).—In section 7ii of the principal Act, after the words “shall be deemed to be the words” “in suits for maintenance five times and in other suits” shall be inserted. [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 6] Amendment of section iv of Act (7 of 1870).—Clause (b) of section 7iv of the principal Act shall be omitted. [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 7] Insertion new paragraph in section 7 of Act (7 of 1870).—In section 7 of the principal Act after paragraph iv the following paragraph shall be inserted:— “iv-A. in a suit for cancellation of a decree for money or other property having a money –value , or other document securing money or other property having such value, According to the value of the subject-matter of the suit, and such value shall be deemed to be— if the whole decree or other document is sought to be cancelled, the amount or the value of the property for which the decree was passed or the other document executed, if a part of the decree or other document is sought to be cancelled, such part of the amount or value of the property. Explanation.—In any case where a suit for the cancellation of a whole decree for money or other property having a money value, or other document securing money or other property having such value has to be instituted, but the substantial relief claimed is only in respect of a part of the amount or the decree was passed or the other document as executed, the value of the subject matter of the suit shall be deemed to be such part of the amount or value of the property in respect of which the relief is sought.” [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 8] Amendment paragraph v of section 7 of Act (7 of 1870).—In paragraph v of section 7 of the principal Act, (1) in clause (a), for the word “ten” the word “ten” shall be substituted; (2) in clause (b), for the word “five” the word “ten” shall be substituted; (3) the following proviso shall be inserted after the existing proviso:— “Provided further that in suits for possession of land if rules are framed under section 3 of the Suits Valuation Act, 1887 (7 of 1887), for determining the value for the purposes of jurisdiction, the value so determined shall be deemed to be the value of the hand for the purposes of this paragraph ; and (4) the existing Explanation shall be re-numbered as Explanation I, and, after the Explanation so re-numbered, the following Explanation shall be added, namely:— “Explanation II.—In this paragraph, ‘building’ includes a house, out-house, stable, privy, urinal, shed, hut, wall, and any other such structure, whether of masonry, bricks, wood, mud, metal or any other material whatsoever.” [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 9] Insertion of new paragraph vi-A in section 7 of Act (7 of 1870).—In section 7 of the principal Act after paragraph vi the following paragraph shall be inserted:— “vi-A. In suits for partition and separate possession of a share of joint family property or of joint property, or to enforce a right to a share in any property on the ground that it is joint family property or joint property— if the plaintiff alleges that he has been excluded from possession of the property of which he claims to be a coparcener or co-owner-according to the market-value of the share in respect of which the suit is instituted. 11 Explanation.—The word “possession” for the purposes of this paragraph includes constructive possession.” [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 10] Haryana Amendment of section 7 of Act 7 of 1870.— In section 7 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act),— (a) in the first proviso to clause (iv), for the words "thirteen rupees", the words `twenty-five rupees' shall be substituted ; and (b) for clause (v), the following clause shall be substituted, namely :— "(v) in suits for the possession of land, houses and gardens, according to the value of the subject matter ; and such value shall be deemed to be,— (a) where the subject matter is land, according to the market value thereof which shall be deemed to be,— (i) in the case of land which is irrigated by perennial canal, two thousand rupees per acre ; (ii) in the case of land which is irrigated by non-perennial canal or by well, one thousand and five hundred rupees per acre ; (iii) in the case of land which is Barani, one thousand rupees per acre ; (iv) in the case of land which is Sailab or Bhud, seven hundred and fifty rupees per acre ; and (v) in the case of land which is Thur, Sem, Banjar or of like nature, five hundred rupees per acre ; and (b) where the subject matter is house or garden, according to its market value ;". [Vide Haryana Act 11 of 1974, s. 2] Haryana Amendment of section 7 of Act 7 of 1870.—In section 7 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act), for sub-clauses (a) and (b) of clause (r), the (following sub-clauses shall be substituted, namely :— "(a) where the subject matter is land other than land situated within municipal limits or Abadi Deh whether under cultivation or not according to the market value thereof which shall be deemed to be,— (i) in the case of land which is irrigated by perennial canal, sixty rupees per acre ; (ii) in the case of land which is irrigated by non-perennial canal or by well, fifty rupees per acre ; and (iii) in the case of land which is Barani, Sailab, Bhud, Thur, Sem, Banjar or of like nature, thirty rupees per acre ; and (b) where the subject matter is house, garden, or land situated within municipal limits or Abadi Deh whether under cultivation or not, according to its market value ; ", [Vide Haryana Act 22 of 1974, s. 2] 8. Fee on memorandum of appeal against order relating to compensation.—The amount of fee payable under this Act on a memorandum of appeal against an order relating t o compensation under any Act for the time being in force for the 1acquisition of land for public 1. See now the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894). 12 purposes, shall be computed according to the difference between the amount awarded and the amount claimed by the appellant. STATE AMENDMENT Orissa Insertion of new section 8A in Act (7 of 1870).--After section 8 of the principal Act, the following section shall be inserted:— “8A. Statement of particulars of subject-matters of suits and plaintiff’s valuation thereof.—In every suit in which an ad valorem court-fee is payable under this Act on the plaint, the plaintiff shall file with the plaint a statement of particulars of the subject-matter of the suit ad his own valuation thereof unless such particulars and the valuation are contained in the plaint. The statement shall be in such form and shall contain such particulars as may be prescribed by the Provincial Government by notification in the Gazette. In every such suit the plaintiff shall also, if the Court so directs, file a duplicate copy of the plaint and of the said statement”. [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 11] Haryana Amendment of section 8 of central Act 7 of 1870.—To section 8 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, (hereinafter called the principal Act), the following proviso, shall be added, namely:-- “Provided that the fixed court fee of one hundred rupees shall be payable on the memorandum of a appeal or cross objections before the High Court arising under the Land Acquisition Act, 1984 or any other law for the time being in force for acquisition of land for public purposes.”. [Vide Haryana Act 3 of 1990, s. 2] 9. Power to ascertain nett profits or market-value.—If the Court sees reason to think that the annual nett profits or the market-value of any such land, house or garden as is mentioned in section 7, paragraphs (v) and (vi), have or has been wrongly estimated, the Court may, for the purpose of computing the fee payable in any suit therein mentioned, issue a commission to any proper person directing him to make such local or other investigation as may be necessary, and to report thereon to the Court. 10. Procedure where net profits or market-value wrongly estimated.—(i) If in the result of any such investigation the Court finds that the net profits or market-value have or has been wrongly estimated, the Court, if the estimation has been excessive, may in its discretion refund the excess paid as such fee: but, if the estimation has been insufficient, the Court shall require the plaintiff to pay so much additional fee as would have been payable had the said market-value or nett profits been rightly estimated. (ii) In such case the suit shall be stayed until the additional fee is paid. If the additional fee is not paid within such time as the Court shall fix, the suit shall be dismissed. 1* * * * * 11. Procedure in suits for mesne profits or account when amount decreed exceeds amount claimed.—In suits for mesne profits or for immovable property and mesne profits, or for an account, if the profits or amount decreed are or is in excess of the profits claimed or the amount at which the plaintiff valued the relief sought, the decree shall not be executed until the difference between the fee actually paid and the fee which would have been payable had the suit comprised the whole of the profits or amount so decreed shall have been paid to the proper officer. Where the amount of mesne profits is left to be ascertained in the course of the execution of the decree, if the profits so ascertained exceed the profits claimed, the further execution of the decree shall be stayed until the difference between the fee actually paid and the fee which would have been payable had 1. Clause (iii) rep. by Act 12 of 1891, s. 3 and the First Schedule. 13 the suit comprised the whole of the profits so ascertained is paid. If the additional fee is not paid within such time as the Court shall fix, the suit shall be dismissed. STATE AMENDMENT Orissa Amendment of section 11 of Act (7 of 1870).—For the second paragraph of section 11 of the principal Act the following paragraphs shall be substituted:— “Where a decree directs an enquiry as to mesne-profits which have accrued on the property during a period prior to the institution of the suit, if the profits ascertained on such inquiry exceed the profits claimed, no final decree shall be passed till the difference between the fee actually paid and the fee which would have been payable had the suit comprised the whole of the profits so ascertained is paid. If the additional fee is not paid within such time as the Court shall fix, the claim for the excess shall be dismissed, unless the Court, for sufficient cause, extends the time for payment. Where a decree directs an inquiry as to mesno-profits from the institution of the suit and a final decree is passed in accordance with the result of such inquiry, the decree shall not be executed until such fee is paid would have been payable on the amount claimed in execution if a separate suit had been instituted therefor.” [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 12] 12. Decision of questions as to valuation.—(i) Every question relating to valuation for the purpose of determining the amount of any fee chargeable under this Chapter on a plaint or memorandum of appeal, shall be decided by the Court in which such plaint or memorandum, as the case may be, is filed, and such decision shall be final as between the parties to the suit. (ii) But whenever any such suit comes before a Court of appeal, reference or revision, if such Court considers that the said question has been wrongly decided to the detriment of the revenue, it shall require the party by whom such fee has been paid to pay so much additional fee as would have been payable had the question been rightly decided, and the provisions of section 10, paragraph (ii), shall apply. STATE AMENDMENT Orissa Amendment of section 12 of Act (7 of 1870).--(1) In section 12 of the principal Act, for paragraph ii, the following paragraph shall be substituted:— “ii. But whenever any such suit comes before a Court of appeal, reference or revision, if such Court considers that the said question has been wrongly decided, it shall— (a) in any case in which the decision is to the detriment of revenue, require the party by whom such fee has been paid, to pay so much additional fee as would have been payable had the question been rightly decided and thereafter— (i) if the party required to pay is the appellant or petitioner, the appeal or petition shall be stayed until the additional fee is paid. If the additional fee is not paid within such time as the Court shall fix, the appeal or petition shall be dismissed; (ii) if the party required to pay it’s the respondent or the opposite party, the Court shall fix a date before which such party shall pay the amount of court fee due from him and, if such party fails to pay the fee required before the date fixed by the Court, the Court shall recover the amount of such fee from him as if it were an arrear of land revenue. Where the Court considers that the amount of such fee should be paid to the respondent or the opposite party by the appellant or the petitioner, as the case may be , the Court may provide for such payment in the order as to costs in the said appeal or petition; and (b) in any case in which the decision is that any excess fee has been levied, direct the refund of so much excess fee to the party who paid it as would not have been payable had the question been rightly decided. 14 Explanation.—For the purposes of this section a question relating to the classification of any suit in regard to section 7 shall not be deemed to be a question relating to valuation.” [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 13] 13. Refund of fee paid on memorandum of appeal.—If an appeal or plaint, which has been rejected by the lower Court on any of the grounds mentioned in the 1Code of Civil Procedure, is ordered to be received, or if a suit is remanded in appeal, on any of the grounds mentioned in 2section 351 of the same Code, for a second decision by the lower Court, the Appellate Court shall grant to the appellant a certificate, authorizing him to receive back from the Collector the full amount of fee paid on the memorandum of appeal: Provided that if, in the case of a remand in appeal, the order of remand shall not cover the whole of the subject-matter of the suit, the certificate so granted shall not authorize the appellant to receive back more than so much fee as would have been originally payable on the part or parts of such subject-matter in respect whereof the suit has been remanded. STATE AMENDMENT Orissa Amendment of section 13.—In the Court-fees Act, 1870 (7 of 1870),— (a) For the marginal heading to section 13, the following marginal heading shall be substituted, namely:— “Refund of fee paid on memorandum of appeal and in cases where compromise or settlement has been arrived at by a Lok Adalat.”; (b) Section 13 shall be renumbered as sub-section (1) thereof and — (i) In sub-section (1) as so renumbered, for the words and figures “ the Code of Civil Procedure” and “section 351 of the same Code”, the words and figures “ the Code Civil Procedure, 1908” and “rule 23 of Order XLI of the First Schedule to the said Code” shall respectively be substituted; and (ii) After sub-section (1) as so renumbered, the following new sub-section shall be inserted, namely:— “(2) Where a compromise or settlement has been arrived at, by a Lok Adalat in a case referred to it under sub-section (1) of section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (39 of 1987), the Court by which the case was so referred to the Lok Adalat shall grant a certificate to the party or every party to the case who paid any court-fee in that case, authorizing him to receive back from the Collector the full amount of the fee so paid.”. [Vide Orissa Act 7 of 2002, s. 2] Tripura Amendment of Section 13.—In section 13 of the principal Act, the expression “the Appellate Court shall grant to the appellant a certificate, authorizing him to receive back from the Collector the full amount of fee paid on the memorandum of appeal”, shall be substituted with the expression “the Appellate Court shall grant to the appellant a certificate, authorizing him to receive back from the Collector or by way of electronic transfer in such manner as may be prescribed, the full amount of fee paid on the memorandum of appeal”. [Vide Tripura Act 17 of 2020, s. 2] 1. See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908). 2. This reference should now be read as applying to the corresponding provision of Act 5 of 1908, i.e., Order XLI, rule 23 of the First Schedule. 15 14. Refund of fee on application for review of judgment.—Where an 1application for a review of judgment is presented on or after the ninetieth day from the date of the decree, the Court, unless the delay was caused by the applicant’s laches, may, in its discretion, grant him a certificate authorizing him to receive back from the Collector so much of the fee paid on the application as exceeds the fee which would have been payable had it been presented before 2such day. Tripura Amendment of Section 14.—In Section 14 of the principal Act, the expression “grant him a certificate authorizing him to receive back from the Collector so much of the fee paid on the application as exceeds the fee which would have been payable had it been presented before such day”, shall be substituted with the expression “grant him a certificate authorizing him to receive back from the Collector or by way of electronic transfer in such manner as may be prescribed, so much of the fee paid on the application as exceeds the fee which would have been payable had it been presented before such day.” [Vide Tripura Act 17 of 2020, s. 3] 15. Refund where Court reverses or modifies its former decision on ground of mistake.—Where an application for a review of judgment is admitted, and where, on the rehearing, the Court reverses or modifies its former decision on the ground of mistake in law or fact, the applicant shall be entitled to a certificate from the Court authori sing him to receive back from the Collector so much of the fee paid on the 3[application] as exceeds the fee payable on any other application to such Court under the second schedule to this Act, No. 1, clause ( b) or clause (d). But nothing in the former part of this section shall entitle the applicant to such certificate where the reversal or modification is due, wholly or in part, to fresh evidence which might have been produced at the original hearing. Tripura Amendment of Section 15.—In section 15 of the principal Act, the expression “the applicant shall be entitled to a certificate from the court authorizing him to receive back from the Collector so much of the fee paid on the application as exceeds the fee payable on any other application to such Court under the second schedule to this Act”, shall be substituted with the expression “the applicant shall be entitled to a certificate from the court authorizing him to receive back from the Collector or by way of electronic transfer in such manner as may be prescribed, so much of the fee paid on the application as exceeds the fee payable on any other application to such court under the second schedule to this Act.” [Vide Tripura Act 17 of 2020, s. 4] 4[16. Refund of fee.—Where the court refers the parties to the suit to any one of the mode of settlement of dispute referred to in section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), the plaintiff shall be entitled to a certificate from the court authorizing him to receive back from the collector, the full amount of the fee paid in respect of such plaint.] Tripura Amendment of Section 16.—In Section 16 of the principal Act, the expression “the plaintiff shall be entitled to a certificate from the Court authorizing him to receive back from the Collector, the full amount of the fee paid in respect of such plaint”, shall be substituted with the expression “the plaintiff shall be entitled to a certificate from the Court authorizing him to receive back from the Collector or by way electronic transfer in such manner as may be prescribed, the full amount of the fee paid in respect of such plaint.” [Vide Tripura Act 17 of 2020, s. 5] 1. As to application for review of judgment, see the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908), s. 114 and Order XLVII of the First Schedule. 2. See I Schedule, Nos. 4 and 5, infra. 3. Subs. by Act 20 of 1870, s. 1, for “plaint or memorandum of appeal”. 4. Ins. by Act 46 of 1999, s. 34 (w.e.f. 1-7-2002). 16 17. Multifarious suits.—Where a suit embraces two or more distinct subjects, the plaint or memorandum of appeal shall be chargeable with the aggregate amount of the fees to which the plaints or memoranda of appeal in suits embracing separately each of such subjects would be liable under this Act. Nothing in the former part of this section shall be deemed to affect the power conferred by the 1Code of Civil Procedure, section 9. 18.Written examinations of complainants.—When the first or only examination of a person who complains of the offence of wrongful confinement, or of wrongful restraint, or of any offence other than an offence for which police-officers may arrest without a warrant, and who has not already presented a petition on which a fee has been levied under this Act, is reduced to writing under the provisions of the 2Code of Criminal Procedure, the complainant shall pay a fee of eight annas, unless the Court thinks fit to remit such payment. STATE AMENDMENT Orissa Amendment of section 18 of Act (7 of 1870).—In section 18 of the principal Act, for the words “eight annas” the words “one rupee” shall be substituted. [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 14] Insertion of a new section 18-A Act (7 of 1l870). —After section 18 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, as in force in the State of Orissa the following new section shall be inserted, namely:— “18-A. Exemption to women.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act no plaint in respect of a suit filed by a women, whose annual income does not exceed three thousand rupees, for maintenance or for enhancement of maintenance or for recovery of share in the estate of her deceased husband or parent in the family property and no petitions filed by any such women for divorce on ground of cruelty or other misconduct on the part of her husband shall be chargeable with court fees. (2) The Court in which such plaint or petition is filed shall have power to make such inquiry as it deems fit for assessing the income of the plaintiff or the petitioner, as the case may be.”. [Vide Orissa Act 55 of 1975, s. 2] 19. Exemption of certain documents.—Nothing contained in this Act shall render the following documents chargeable with any fee:— (i) Power-of-attorney to institute or defend a suit when executed 3[by a member of any of the Armed Forces of the Union] not in civil employment. 4* * * * * (iii) Written statements called for by the Court after the first hearing of a suit. 5* * * * * (v) Plaints in suits tried by 6village Munsifs in the Presidency of Fort St. George. (vi) Plaints and processes in suits before District Panchayats in the same residency. (vii) Plaints in suits before Collectors under Madras Regulation 12 of 1816. (viii) Probate of a will, letters of administration, 7[and, save as regards debts and securities a certificate under Bombay Regulation 8 of 1827], where the amount or value of the property in respect of which the probate or letters or certificate shall be granted does not exceed one thousand rupees. (ix) Application or petition to a Collector or other officer making a settlement of land-revenue, or to a Board of Revenue, or a Commissioner of Revenue, relating to matters connected with the 1. See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908). 2. This reference should now be read as referring to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Act 5 of 1898)—see s. 3 of that Act. 3. Subs. by the A.O. 1950, for “by an officer, warrant-officer, non-commissioned officer or private of Her Majesty’s army”. 4 Clause (ii) rep. by Act 12 of 1891, s. 3 and the First Schedule. 5. Clause (iv) rep. by Act 13 of 1889, s. 2 and the Schedule. 6. See the Madras Village Courts Act, 1889 (Mad. 1 of 1889). 7. Subs. by Act 7 of 1889, s. 13, for “and certificate mentioned in the first schedule to this Act annexed, No. 12”. 17 assessment of land or the ascertainment of rights thereto or interests therein, if presented previous to the final confirmation of such settlement. (x) Application relating to a supply for irrigation of water belonging to Government. (xi) Application for leave to extend cultivation, or to relinquish land, when presented to an officer of land-revenue by a person holding, under direct engagement with Government, land of which the revenue is settled, but not permanently. (xii) Application for service of notice of relinquishment of land or of enhancement of rent. (xiii) Written authority to an agent to distrain. (xiv) First application (other than a petition containing a criminal charge or information) for the summons of a witness or other person to attend either to give evidence or to produce a document or in respect of the production or filing of an exhibit not being an affidavit made for the immediate purpose of being produced in Court. (xv) Bail-bonds in criminal cases, recognizances to prosecute or give evidence, and recognizances for personal appearance or otherwise. (xvi) Petition, application, charge or information respecting any offence when presented, made or laid to or before a police-officer, or to or before the 1Heads of Villages or the 2Village Police in the territories respectively subject to the Governors in Council of Madras and Bombay. (xvii) Petition by a prisoner, or other person in duress or under restraint of any Court or its officers. (xviii) Complaint of a public servant [as defined in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)], a municipal officer, or an officer or servant of a Railway Company. (xix) Application for permission to cut timber in Government forests, or otherwise relating to such forests. (xx) Application for the payment of money due by Government to the applicant. (xxi) Petition of appeal against the chaukidari assessment under 3Act No. 20 of 1856, or against any municipal tax. (xxii) Applications for compensation under any law for the time being in force relating to the 4acquisition of property for public purposes. (xxiii) Petitions presented to the Special Commissioner appointed under 5Bengal Act No. 2 of 1869 (to ascertain, regulate and record certain tenures in Chota Nagpur.). [6(xxiv) (Petitions under the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 (15 of 1872), sections 45 and 48.] STATE AMENDMENT Orissa In section 19 of the Court-Fees Act, 1870 (7 of 1870) (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act) in clause (viii) for the words” one thousand rupees” the words “two thousand rupees” shall be substituted. [Vide Orissa Act 11 of 1967, s. 3] 1. See Madras Regulations 11 of 1816 and 4 of 1821, s. 6. 2. See Bombay Village Police Act, 1867 (Bom. 8 of 1867), ss. 14, 15 and 16. 3. The Bengal Chaukidari Act, 1856. 4. See now the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894). 5. The Chota Nagpur Tenures Act, 1869. 6. Subs. by Act 15 of 1872, s. 2, for clause (xxiv) which read as follows:--- “Petitions under the 14th and 15th of Victoria, Ch. 40 (an Act for marriages in India), s. 5, or under Act No. 5 of 1852, s. 9”. 18 1[CHAPTER IIIA PROBATES, LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION AND CERTIFICATES OF ADMINISTRATION 19A. Relief where too high a court-fee has been paid.—Where any person on applying for the probate of a will or letters of administration has estimated the property of the deceased to be of greater value than the same has afterwards proved to be, and has consequently paid too high a court-fee thereon, if, within six months after the true value of the property has been ascertained, such person produces the probate or letters to the Chief Controlling Revenue-authority 2[for the local area] in which the probate or letters has or have been granted, and delivers to such Authority a particular inventory and valuation of the property of the deceased, verified by affidavit or affirmation, and if such Authority is satisfied that a greater fee was paid on the probate or letters than the law required, the said Authority may— (a) cancel the stamp on the probate or letters if such stamp has not been already cancelled; (b) substitute another stamp for denoting the court-fee which should have been paid thereon; and (c) make an allowance for the difference between them as in the case of spoiled stamps, or repay the same in money, at his discretion. 19B. Relief where debts due from a deceased person have been paid out of his estate.— Whenever it is proved to the satisfaction of such Authority that an executor or administrator has paid debts due from the deceased to such an amount as, being deducted out of the amount or value of the estate, reduces the same to a sum which, if it had been the whole gross amount or value of the estate, would have occasioned a less court-fee to be paid on the probate or letters of administration granted in respect of such estate than has been actually paid thereon under this Act, such Authority may return the difference, provided the same be claimed within three years after the date of such probate or letters. But when by reason of any legal proceeding, the debts due from the deceased have not been ascertained and paid, or his effects have not been recovered and made available, and in consequence thereof the executor or administrator is prevented from claiming the return of such difference within the said term of three years, the said Authority may allow such further time for making the claim as may appear to be reasonable under the circumstances. 19C. Relief in case of several grants.—Whenever 3 *** a grant of probate or letters of administration has been or is made in respect of the whole of the property belonging to an estate, and the full fee chargeable under this Act has been or is paid thereon, no fee shall be chargeable under the same Act when a like grant is made in respect of the whole or any part of the same property belonging to the same estate. Whenever such a grant has been or is made in respect of any property forming part of an estate, the amount of fees then actually paid under this Act shall be deducted when a like grant is made in respect of property belonging to the same estate, identical with or including the property to which the former grant relates. 19D. Probates declared valid as to trust-property though not covered by court-fee.—The probate of the will or the letters of administration of the effects of any person deceased heretofore or hereafter granted shall be deemed valid and available by his executors or administrators for recovering, transferring or assigning, any movable or immovable property whereof or whereto the deceased was possessed or entitled, either wholly or partially as a trustee, notwithstanding the amount 1. Ins. by Act 13 of 1875, s. 6. 2. Subs. by Act 10 of 1901, s. 3(1), for “of the Province”. 3. The word “such” rep. by Act 12 of 1891. 19 or value of such property is not included in the amount or value of the estate in respect of which a court-fee was paid on such probate or letters of administration. 19E. Provision for case where too low a court-fee has been paid on probates, etc.—Where any person on applying for probate or letters of administration has estimated the estate of the deceased to be of less value than the same has afterwards proved to be, and has in consequence paid too low a court-fee thereon, the Chief Controlling Revenue-authority 1[for the local area] in which the probate or letters has or have been granted may, on the value of the estate of the deceased being verified by affidavit or affirmation, cause the probate or letters of administration to be duly stamped on payment of the full court-fee which ought to have been originally paid thereon in respect of such value and of the further penalty, if the probate or letters is or are produced within one year from the date of grant, of five times, or, if it or they is or are produced after one year from such date, of twenty times, such proper court-fee, without any deduction of the court-fee originally paid on such probate or letters: Provided that, if the application be made within six months after the ascertainment of the true value of the estate and the discovery that too low a court -fee was at first paid on the probate or letters, and if the said Authority is satisfied that such fee was paid in consequence of a mistake or of its not being known at the time that some particular part of the estate belonged to the deceased, and without any intention of fraud or to delay the payment of the proper court-fee, the said Authority may remit the said penalty, and cause the probate or letters to be duly stamped on payment only of the sum wanting to make up the fee which should have been at first paid thereon. 19F. Administrator to give proper security before letters stamped under section 19E.—In case of letters of administration on which too low a court-fee has been paid at first, the said Authority shall not cause the same to be duly stamped in manner aforesaid until the administrator has given such security to the Court by which the letters of administration have been granted as ought by law to have been given on the granting thereof in case the full value of the estate of the deceased had been then ascertained. 2[19G. Executors, etc., not paying full court-fee on probates, etc., within six months after discovery of under-payment.—Where too low a court-fee has been paid on any probate or letters of administration in consequence of any mistake, or of its not being known at the time that some particular part of the estate belonged to the deceased, if any executor or administrator acting under such probate or letters does not, within six months 3*** after the discovery of the mistake or of any effects not known at the time to have belonged to the deceased, apply to the said Authority and pay what is wanting to make up the court-fee which ought to have been paid at first on such probate or letters, he shall forfeit the sum of one thousand rupees and also a further sum at the rate of ten percent. on the amount of the sum wanting to make up the proper court-fee.] 4 [19H. Notice of applications for probate or letters of administration to be given to Revenue-authorities, and procedure thereon.—(1) Where an application for probate or letters of administration is made to any Court other than a High Court, the Court shall cause notice of the application to be given to the Collector. (2) Where such an application as aforesaid is made to a High Court, the High Court shall cause notice of the application to be given to the Chief Controlling Revenue-authority 5[for the local area in which the High Court is situated]. (3) The Collector within the local limits of whose revenue-jurisdiction the property of the deceased or any part thereof is, may at any time inspect or cause to be inspected, and take or cause to be taken copies of, the record of any case in which application for probate or letters of administration has been made; and if, on such inspection or otherwise, he is of opinion that the petitioner has under-estimated the value of the property of the deceased, the Collector may, if he thinks fit, require the attendance of the 1. Subs. by Act 10 of 1901, s. 3(1), for “of the Province”. 2. As to recovery of penalties or forfeitures under s. 19G, see s. 19J, infra. 3. The words and figures “after the first day of April, 1875, or “rep. by Act 12 of 1891”. 4. Ins. by Act 11 of 1899, s. 2. 5. Subs. by Act 10 of 1901, s. 3(2), for “of the Province”. 20 petitioner (either in person or by agent) and take evidence and inquire into the matter in such manner as he may think fit, and, if he is still of opinion that the value of the property has been under-estimated, may require the petitioner to amend the valuation. (4) If the petitioner does not amend the valuation to the satisfaction of the Collector, the Collector may move the Court before which the application for probate or letters of administration was made, to hold an inquiry into the true value of the property: Provided that no such motion shall be made after the expiration of six months from the date of the exhibition of the inventory required by section 277 of the 1Indian Succession Act, 1865 (10 of 1865), or as the case may be, by section 98 of the 1Probate and Administration Act, 1881 (5 of 1881). (5) The Court, when so moved as aforesaid, shall hold, or cause to be held, an inquiry accordingly, and shall record a finding as to the true value, as near as may be, at which the property of the deceased should have been estimated. The Collector shall be deemed to be a party to the inquiry. (6) For the purposes of any such inquiry, the Court or person authori sed by the Court to hold the inquiry may examine the petitioner for probate or letters of administration on oath (whether in person or by commission), and may take such further evidence as may be produced to prove the true value of the property. The person authorised as aforesaid to hold the inquiry shall return to the Court the evidence taken by him and report the result of the inquiry, and such report and the evidence so taken shall be evidence in the proceeding, and the Court may record a finding in accordance with the report, unless it is satisfied that it is erroneous. (7) The finding of the Court recorded under sub-section (5) shall be final, but shall not bar the entertainment and disposal by the Chief Controlling Revenue-authority of any application under section 19E. (8) The State Government may make rules for the guidance of Collectors in the exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3).] 2[19I. Payment of court-fees in respect of probates and letters of administration.—(1) No order entitling the petitioner to the grant of probate or letters of administration shall be made upon an application for such grant until the petitioner has filed in the Court a valuation of the property in the form set forth in the third schedule, and the Court is satisfied that the fee mentioned in No. 11 of the first schedule has been paid on such valuation. (2) The grant of probate or letters of administration shall not be delayed by reason of any motion made by the Collector under section 19H, sub-section (4).] 2[19J. Recovery of penalties, etc.— (1) Any excess fee found to be payable on any inquiry held under section 19H, sub-section (6), and any penalty or forfeiture under section 19G, may, on the certificate of the Chief Controlling Revenue-authority, be recovered from the executor or administrator as if it were an arrear of land-revenue by any Collector 3***. (2) The Chief Controlling Revenue-authority may remit the whole or any part of any such penalty or forfeiture as aforesaid, or any part of any penalty under section 19E or of any court-fee under section 19E in excess of the full court-fee which ought to have been paid.] 2[19K. Sections 6 and 28 not to apply to probates or letters of administration.—Nothing in section 6 or section 28 shall apply to probates or letters of administration.]] CHAPTER IV PROCESS-FEES 20. Rules as to cost of processes.—The High Court shall, as soon as may be, make rules as to the following matters:— (i) The fees chargeable for serving and executing processes issued by such court in its appellate jurisdiction, and by the other Civil and Revenue Courts established within the local limits of such jurisdiction; 1. See now the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1925). 2. Ins. by Act 11 of 1899, s 2. 3. The words “in any part of British India” rep by the A.O. 1948. 21 (ii) the fees chargeable for serving and executing processes issued by the Criminal Courts established within such limits in the case of offences other than offences for which police-officers may arrest without a warrant; and (iii) the remuneration of the peons and all other persons employed by leave of a Court in the service or execution of processes. The High Court may from time to time alter and add to the rules so made. Confirmation and publication of rules.—All such rules, alterations and additions shall, after being confirmed by the State Government 1***, be published in the Official Gazette, and shall thereupon have the force of law. Until such rules shall be so made and published, the fees now leviable for serving and executing processes shall continue to be levied, and shall be deemed to be fees leviable under this Act. 21. Tables of process fees.—A table in the English and Vernacular languages, showing the fees chargeable for such service and execution, shall be exposed to view in a conspicuous part of each Court. 22. Number of peons in district and subordinate Courts.—Subject to rules to be made by the High Court and approved by the State Government 2***, every District Judge and every Magistrate of a district shall fix, and may from time to time alter, the number of peons necessary to be employed for the service and execution of processes issued out of his Court and each of the Courts subordinate thereto, Number of peons in Mufassal Small Cause Courts.—and for the purposes of this section, every Court of Small Causes established under Act No. 11 of 1865 (to consolidate and amend the law relating to Courts of Small Causes beyond the local limits of the ordinary o riginal civil jurisdiction of the High Courts of Judicature)3 shall be deemed to be subordinate to the Court of the District Judge. 23. Number of peons in Revenue Courts.—Subject to rules to be framed by the Chief Controlling Revenue-authority and approved by the State Government 2***, every officer performing the functions of a Collector of a district shall fix, and may from time to time alter, the number of peons necessary to be employed for the service and execution of processes issued out of his Court or the courts subordinate to him. 24. [Process served under this Chapter to be held to be process within meaning of Code of Civil Procedure .] Rep. by the Repealing and Amending Act , 1891 (12 of 1891), STATE AMENDMENT Uttar Pradesh Substitution of section 24-A.—For section 24-A for the principal Act, the following section shall be substituted, namely:— “24-A. Control of Court fee and Stamp Commissioner.—(1) The levy of fees under this Act shall be under the general control and superintendence of the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, who may be assisted in the supervision thereof by the Commissioner of Stamps and by as many Additional many Additional Commissioners of the Stamps, Deputy Commissioners of Stamps and Assistant Commissioners of Stamps as the State Government may appoint in the behalf or by any other subordinate agency appointed for the purpose. (2) The Officers and the agency referred to in sub-section (1) shall have access to all records, and shall be furnished with all such information as may be required by them for the performance of their duties under this Act.” [Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 6 of 1980, s. 5] 1. The words “and sanctioned by the Governor General of India in Council” rep. by Act 38 of 1920, s. 2 and the First Schedule. 2. The words “and the Governor General of India in Council” Rep. by Act 38 of 1920, s. 2 and the First Schedule. 3. The reference to Act 11 of 1865 should now be read as referring to the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 (9 of 1887); see s. 2(3) of that Act. 22 CHAPTER V OF THE MODE OF LEVYING FEES 25. Collection of fees by stamps.—All fees referred to in section 3 or chargeable under this Act shall be collected by stamps. STATE AMENDMENT Meghalaya Amendment section 25 of Central Act 7 of 1870.—In the Court Fees act, 1870 after section 25 the following new section shall be inserted as section 25A, namely:-- “25A. Notwithstanding anything contained in section 25 where, (a) (i) the State Government, in relation to any area in the State, or (ii) The Deputy Commissioner, in relation to any area in the district under his charge, is satisfied that on account of temporary shortage of stamps in any area, fees cannot be paid, and payment of fees cannot be indicated on documents by means of stamps, the State Government, or as the case may be, the Deputy Commissioner, may, by notification in the official Gazette, direct that, in such area and for such period as may be specified in such notification, the fees may be paid in cash in any Treasury or Sub-Treasury and shall, on production of a challan evidencing payment of fees in the Government treasury, certify by endorsement on the document in respect of which the fees is paid, that the fees have been paid, and state in the said endorsement the amount of the fees so paid. (b) An endorsement made on any document under clause (a) shall have the same effect as if the fees of an amount equal to the amount stated in the endorsement had been paid in respect of, and such payment has been indicated on, such documents by means of stamps under section 25. [Vide Meghalaya Act 2 of 1972, s. 2] Tripura Amendment of Section 25.— In Section 25 of the principal Act, the expression “stamps”, shall be substituted with the expression “stamps or electronic transfer of payment to State Government in such manner as may be prescribed.” [Vide Tripura Act 17 of 2020, s. 6] 26. Stamps to be impressed or adhesive.—The stamps used to denote any fees chargeable under this Act shall be impressed or adhesive, or pertly impressed and partly adhesive, as the 1[appropriate Government] may, by notification in the Official Gazette, from time to time direct2. STATE AMENDMENT Jammu and Kashmir (UT).— Section 26 shall be numbered as sub-section (1) thereof, and after sub-section (1) so renumbered, insert the following sub-section, namely:— (2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), and section 25, “stamp” means any mark, seal or endorsement by any agency or person duly authorised by the Appropriate Government, and includes an adhesive or impressed stamp, for the purposes of court fee chargeable under this Act. Explanation:—“impressed stamp” includes impression by a franking machine or another machine, or a unique number generated by e-stamping or similar software, as the Appropriate Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, specify”. [Vide the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization (Adaptation of Central Laws) Order, 2020, notification No. S.O. 1123(E) dated (18-3-2020).] 1. Subs. by the A.O. 1937, for “L. G.”. 2. For rules as to levy of court-fees by adhesive and impressed stamps, see Gazette of India, 1883, Pt. I, p. 189. 23 Union Territory of Ladakh Section 26.—Numbered as sub-section (1) thereof, and after sub-section (1) as so numbered, insert- '(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), and section 25, "stamp" means any mark, seal or endorsement by any agency or person duly authorised by the Appropriate Government, and includes an adhesive or impressed stamp, for the purposes of court fee chargeable under this Act. Explanation 7.—The expression "impressed stamp" includes impression by a franking machine or another machine, or a unique number generated by e-stamping or similar software, as the Appropriate Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify.’. Explanation 2.—The expression "e-stamping" means stamping using unique number or code through an electronic machine or a software application’. [Vide Union Territory of Ladakh Reorganisation (Adaptation of Central Laws) Order, 2020, Notification No. S.O. 3774(E), dated (23-10-2020).] Haryana Amendment of section 26 of Central Act 7 of 1870.—In section 26 of the Court Fees act, 1870, the following explanation shall be added, namely:-- “Explanation.—For the purposes of this section,- (i) “stamp” means any mark, seal or endorsement by any agency or person duly authorized by the State Government and includes and adhesive or impressed stamp chargeable for the purposes of court fee under this Act; and (ii) “impressed stamp” means an impression by a franking or any other machine, or e-stamping.”. [Vide Haryana Act 29 of 2016, s. 2] 27. Rules for supply, number, renewal and keeping accounts of stamps.—The 1[appropriate Government] may, from time to time, make rules for regulating— (a) the supply of stamps to be used under this Act; (b) the number of stamps to be used for denoting any fee chargeabl e under this Act; (c) the renewal of damaged or spoiled stamps; and (d) the keeping accounts of all stamps used under this Act: Provided that, in the case of stamps used under section 3 in a High Court, such rules shall be made with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of such Court. All such rules shall be published in the Official Gazette, and shall thereupon have the force of law. Tripura Amendment of Section 27.— Clause (a) of Section 27 of the principal Act, shall be substituted with the following- “(a) the manner of supply of stamps or electronic transfer of payment of court-fee and refund thereof;” [Vide Tripura Act 17 of 2020, s. 7] 28. Stamping documents inadvertently received.—No document which ought to bear a stamp under this Act shall be of any validity, unless and until it is properly stamped. But, if any such document is through mistake or inadvertence received, filed or used in any Court or office without being properly stamped, the presiding Judge or the head of the office, as the case may be, 1. Subs. by the A.O. 1937 for “L.G.”. 24 or, in the case of a High Court, any Judge of such Court, may, if he thinks fit, order that such document be stamped as he may direct; and, on such document being stamped accordingly, the same and every proceeding relative thereto shall be as valid as if it had been properly stamped in the first instance. STATE AMENDMENT Orissa Insertion a new section 28-A, Act (7 of 1870).—After section 28 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 the following new section shall be inserted, namely:— “28-A. Recovery Deficient or unpaid court fees.---(1) If, on examination of the records of a Civil, Criminal or Revenue case which has been disposed of, a public officer finds that the fee payable under the Act or the rules made thereunder on any document filed, exhibited or recorded therein has not been paid or has been insufficiently paid, he shall report the fact to the presiding officer of the Court or to the revenue officer concerned. (2) Such presiding officer or revenue officer, after satisfying himself of the correctness of such report, shall record a provisional finding that the proper fee has not been paid and determine the amount of fee payable and the person from whom the fee or the difference thereof, if any, shall be recoverable. (3) After recording a finding under sub-section (2), the presiding officer or revenue officer shall issue a notice to the person referred to in that sub-section to show cause why he should not be ordered to pay the fee determined thereunder, and , if sufficient cause is not shown, the presiding officer or revenue officer shall confirm the finding and make an order requiring such person to pay the proper fee before a date to be specified in that notice. (4) If such person fails to pay the fee in accordance with the notice issued under sub-section (3), it shall on the certificate of such presiding officer or revenue officer, be recoverable as an arrear of land revenue.” [Vide Orissa Act 13 of 1957, s. 2] 29. Amended document.—Where any such document is amended in order merely to correct a mistake and to make it conform to the original intention of the parties, it shall not be necessary to impose a fresh stamp. 30. Cancellation of stamp.—No document requiring a stamp under this Act shall be filed or acted upon in any proceeding in any Court or office until the stamp has been cancelled. Such officer as the Court or the head of the office may from time to time appoint shall, on receiving any such document, forthwith effect such cancellation by punching out the figure -head so as to leave the amount designated on the stamp untouched, and the part removed by punching shall be burnt or otherwise destroyed. Tripura Amendment of Section 30.—In Section 30 of the principal Act, after the existing text, the following proviso shall be added- “Provided that, where court-fee is paid by electronic transfer of payment, the officer competent to cancel stamp shall verify the genuineness of the payment and after satisfying himself that the court- fee is paid, shall lock the entry in the computer and make an endorsement under his signature on the document that the court-fee is paid and the entry is locked”. [Vide Tripura Act 17 of 2020, s. 8] Bihar Insertion of new Chapter V-A in Act VII of 1870.---After Chapter V of the Court-fees Act, 1870 (Act VII of 1870) (hereinafter referred to the said Act) the following Chapter and Section shall be inserted, namely:- "Chapter V-A.-Levy of Additional Surcharge. 30-A. The fees leviable under the Act, shall be increased in each case by an additional surcharge at the rate of ten per centum of the amount of the Court Fees." 25 [Vide Bihar Act 20 of 1977, s. 2] CHAPTER VI MISCELLANEOUS 31. [Repayment of fees paid on applications to Criminal Courts.] Rep. by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1923 (18 of 1923), s. 163. 32. [Amendment of Act 8 of 1859 and Act 9 of 1869.] Rep. by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1891 (12 of 1891). 33. Admission in criminal cases of documents for which proper fee has not been paid.— Whenever the filing or exhibition in a Criminal Court of a document in respect of which the proper fee has not been paid is, in the opinion of the presiding Judge, necessary to prevent a failure of justice, nothing contained in section 4 or section 6 shall be deemed to prohibit such filing or exhibition. 1[34. Sale of stamps.—(1) The 2[appropriate Government] may from time to time make rules for regulating the sale of stamps to be used under this Act, the persons by whom alone such sale is to be conducted, and the duties and remuneration of such persons. (2) All such rules shall be published in the Official Gazette, and shall thereupon have the force of law. (3) Any person appointed to sell stamps who disobeys any rule made under this section, and any person not so appointed who sells or offers for sale any stamp, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.] 35. Power to reduce or remit fees.—The 2[appropriate Government] may, from time to time by notification in the Official Gazette, reduce or remit, in the whole or in any part of 3[the territories under its administration], all or any of the fees mentioned in the first and second schedules to this Act annexed, and may in like manner cancel or vary such order. STATE AMENDMENT Orissa Amendment of section 35 of Act (7 of 1870).—For section 35 of the principal Act, the following section shall be substituted:— “35. Power to suspend, reduce or remit fees.—(1) The Provincial Government may from time to time subject to such conditions or restrictions as it may think fit to impose, by notification in the Gazette suspend the payment of or reduce or remit, in the whole of Orissa or in any part thereof, all or any of the fees mentioned in Schedules I and II to this Act annexed and may in like manner cancel or vary such order. (3) The Provincial Government may from time to time by rules prescribe the manner in which any fee the payment of which is suspended under sub-section (1) may be realized and for this purpose direct that such fee may be recovered as if it were an arrear of land revenue.” [Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 15] Haryana Substitution of section 35 of Central Act 7 of 1870 .— For section 35 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act), the following section shall be substituted, namely:— "35. Power to remit or reduce fees.—The State Government may, subject to such conditions or restrictions as it may think fit to impose, by notification in the Official Gazette, reduce or remit in relation to all or any class of persons, in the whole or any part of the territories under its administration, all or any of the fees mentioned in the first and second schedules annexed to this Act and may in like manner cancel or vary such order.” 1. Subs. by Act 12 of 1891, for section 34. 2. Subs. by the A.O.1937, for “L. G.”. 3. Subs. by Act 38 of 1920, s. 2 and the First Schedule, for “British India”. 26 [Vide Haryana Act 27 of 1976, s. 2] Bihar Substitution of new Section for Section 35 of Act VII of 1870. - For Section 35 of the said Act, the following Section shall be substituted, namely:- "35. Power to remit or reduce Court-fees.---The State Government may, subject to such condition or restriction as it may think fit to impose, by order published in the Official Gazette, reduce or remit in relation to all or any class of persons, in the whole or any part of the State, all or any of the fees mentioned in the First and Second Schedules to this Act and may in like manner cancel or vary such order." [Vide Bihar Act 20 of 1977, s. 3] 36. Saving of fees to certain officers of High Courts.—Nothing in Chapters II and V of this Act applies to the commission payable to the Accountant General of the High Court at Fort William, or to the fees which any officer of a High Court is allowed to receive in addition to a fixed salary. STATE AMENDMENT Haryana Insertion of section 37 in Act 7 of 1870.— After section 36 of the principal Act, the following section shall be inserted, namely :— “37. Fees in High Court.—Nothing contained in Schedules I and II to this act shall apply to the High Court of Punjab and Haryana and the provisions in that behalf applicable immediately before the 1st day of November, 1966, shall continue to apply to the said High Court.”. [Vide Haryana Act 22 of 1974, s. 3] 27 SCHEDULE I AD VALOREM FEES Number ______ Proper Fee 1. 1 Plaint 2 [written statement pleading a set-off or counter- claim] or memorandum of appeal (not otherwise provided for in this Act) 2[or of cross-objection] presented to any Civil or Revenue Court except those mentioned in section 3. When the amount or value of the subject-matter in dispute does not exceed five rupees. Six annas. When such amount or value exceeds five rupees, for every five rupees, or part thereof, in excess of five rupees, up to one hundred rupees. Six annas. When such amount or value exceeds one hundred rupees, for every ten rupees, or part thereof, in excess of one hundred rupees, up to one thousand rupees. Twelve annas. When such amount or value exceeds one thousand rupees, for every one hundred rupees, or part thereof, in excess of one thousand rupees, up to five thousand rupees. Five rupees. When such amount or value exceeds five thousand rupees, for every two hundred and fifty rupees, or part thereof, in excess of five thousand rupees, up to ten thousand rupees. Ten rupees. When such amount or value exceeds ten thousand rupees, for every five hundred rupees, or part thereof, in excess of ten thousand rupees, up to twenty thousand rupees. Fifteen rupees. When such amount or value exceeds twenty thousand rupees, for every one thousand rupees, or part thereof, in excess of twenty thousand rupees, up to thirty thousand rupees. Twenty rupees. When such amount or value exceeds thirty thousand rupees, for every two thousand rupees, or part thereof, in excess of thirty thousand rupees, up to fifty thousand rupees. Twenty rupees. When such amount or value exceeds fifty thousand rupees, for every five thousand rupees, or part thereof, in excess of fifty thousand rupees: Twenty-five rupees. Provided that the maximum fee leviable on a plaint or memorandum of appeal shall be three thousand rupees. 2. Plaint 3 *** in a suit for possession under 4 [the Specific Relief Act, 1877, section 9]. 3. [Repealed by the Indian Registration Act, 1871 (8 of 1871)]. .. A fee of one-half the amount prescribed in the foregoing scale. .. 4. Application for review of judgment,5if presented on or after the ninetieth day from the date of the decree. .. The fee leviable on the plaint or memorandum of appeal. 5. Application for review of judgments, 5if presented before the ninetieth day from the date of the decree. .. One-half of the fee leviable on the plaint or memorandum of appeal. 1. To ascertain the proper fee leviable on the institution of a suit, see the table annexed to this Schedule. 2. Ins. by Act 5 of 1908, s. 155 and the Fourth Schedule. 3. The words “or memorandum of appeal” rep. by Act 20 of 1870. 4. Subs. by Act 12 of 1891, s. 3 and the First Schedule for “Act No. 14 of 1859 (to provide for the limitation of suits)”. 5. As to application for review of judgment, see the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908). 28 Number Proper Fee 6. Copy or translation of a judgment or order not being, or having the force of, a decree. When such judgment or order is passed by any Civil Court other than a High Court, or by the presiding officer of any Revenue Court or office, or by any other Judicial or Executive Authority— (a) If the amount or value of the subject-matter is fifty or less than fifty rupees. Four annas. (b) If such amount or value exceeds fifty rupees. Eight annas. When such judgment or order is passed by a High Court. One rupee. 7. Copy of a decree or order having the force of a decree. When such decree or order is made by any Civil Court other than a High Court, or by any Revenue Court— (a) If the amount or value of the subject-matter of the suit wherein such decree or order is made is fifty or less than fifty rupees. Eight annas. (b) If such amount or value exceeds fifty rupees. One rupee. When such decree or order is made by a High Court. Four rupees. 8. Copy of any document liable to stamp-duty under the Indian Stamp Act, 18791, (1 of 1879), when left by any party to a suit or proceeding in place of the original withdrawn. (a) When the stamp-duty chargeable on the original does not exceed eight annas. The amount of the duty chargeable on the original. (b) In any other case. Eight annas. 9. Copy of any revenue or judicial proceeding or order not otherwise provided for by this Act, or copy of any account, statement, report or the like, taken out of any Civil or Criminal or Revenue Court or office, or from the office of any chief officer charged with the executive administration of a Division. For every three hundred and sixty words or fraction of three hundred and sixty words. Eight annas. 10. [Rep. by the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (8 of 1890).] .. .. 2[11. Probate of a will or letters of administration with or without will annexed. 3[When the amount or value of the property in respect of which the grant of probate or letters is made exceeds one thousand rupees, but does not exceed ten thousand rupees. Two per centum on such amount or value. When such amount or value exceeds ten thousand rupees, but does not exceed fifty thousand rupees. Two and one-half per centum on such amount or value. When such amount or value exceeds fifty thousand rupees: Three per centum on such amount or value.] Provided that when, after the grant of a certificate under the Succession Certificate Act, 1889 (7 of 1889), or under the Regulation of the Bombay Code, No. 8 of 1827, in respect of any property included in an estate, a grant of probate or letters of administration is made in respect of the same estate, the fee payable in respect of the letter grant shall be reduced by the amount of the fee paid in respect of the former grant. 1. See now the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899). 2. Subs. by Act 7 of 1889, s. 13(1), for article 11. 3. These items were subs. by Act 7 of 1910, s. 2(i). 29 Number ______ Proper Fee 1[12. Certificate under the Succession Certificate Act, 1889 (7 of 1889). In any case. Two per centum on the amount or value of any debt or security specified in the certificate under section 8 of the Act, and three per centum on the amount or value of any debt or security to which the certificate is extended under section 10 of the Act. NOTE.—(1) The amount of a debt is its amount, inclu-ding interest, on the day on which the inclusion of the debt in the certificate is applied for, so far as such amount can be asc-ertained. (2) Whether or not any power with respect to a security specified in a certificate has been conferred under the Act, and, where such a power has been so conferred, whether the power is for the receiving of interest or dividends on, or for the negotiation or transfer, of the security, or for both purposes, the value of the security is its market-value on the day on which the inclusion of the security in the certificate is applied for, so far as such value can be ascertained.] 2 [12A. Certificate under the Regulation of the Bombay Code No. 8 of 1827. 3[(1) As regards debts and securities. The same fee as would be payable in respect of a certificate under the Succession Certificate Act, 1889 (7 of 1889), or in respect of an ext- ension of such a cert- ificate, as the case may be. (2) As regards other property in respect of which the certificate is granted— When the amount or value of such property exceeds one thousand rupees, but does not exceed ten thousand rupees. Two per centum on such amount or value. When such amount or value exceeds ten thousand rupees, but does not exceed fifty thousand rupees. Two and one-half per centum on such amount or value. When such amount or value exceeds fifty thousand rupees. Three per centum on such amount or value.]] 1. Subs. by Act 7 of 1889, s. 13(1), for the article 12. 2. Subs. by s. 13(1), ibid., for article 12A. 3 These items were subs. by Act 7 of 1910, s. 2(ii). 30 Number ______ Proper Fee 1 13. Application to the 2 [High Court of Punjab] for the exercise of its jurisdiction under section 44 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918 (Punjab 6 of 1918) or to the Court of the Financial Commissioner of Punjab for the exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under section 84 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 (16 of 1887). When the amount or value of the subject-matter in dispute does not exceed twenty-five rupees. Two rupees. When such amount or value exceeds twenty-five rupees. The fee leviable on a memorandum of appeal. 14. [Rep. by the A.O. 1937.] 15. [Rep. by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1923 (11 of 1923), s. 3 and Sch. II.] 1. Ins. by the Punjab Courts Act, 1884 (8 of 1884), s. 71, as amended by the Punjab Courts Act 1899 (25 of 1899), s. 6. Article 13 was rep. in the Punjab by s. 5 of the Punjab Courts (Amendment) Act, 1912 (Punjab 1 of 1912); but it has since been revived in this form by the Court-fees (Punjab Amendment) Act, 1922 (Punjab 7 of 1922). 2. Subs. by the A.O. 1948, for “High Court of Judicature at Lahore”. 31 STATE AMENDMENT Assam. Amendment of Schedule 1 of Act 7 of 1870.—In Schedule I to the principal Act,— (1) for Article 1, the following shall be substituted, namely:— Number Proper fee (1) (2) (3) “1. Plaint, written statement pleading a set-off or counter- claim or memorandum of appeal (not otherwise provided for in this Act) or, of cross-objection presented to any Civil or Revenue Court except those mentioned in Section 3. When the amount or value of the subject- matter in dispute does not exceed one hundred rupees, for every five rupees, or, part thereof of such amount or value; fifty-five paise. and When such amount or value exceeds one hundred rupees, for every ten rupees or part thereof, in excess of one hundred rupees up to one hundred and fifty rupees; One rupee and ninety- five paise. and When such amount or values exceeds one hundred and fifty rupees, for every ten rupees, or part thereof, up to one thousand rupees; One rupee and forty paise. and When such amount or value exceeds one thousand rupees, for every one hundred rupees, or part thereof in excess of one thousand rupees, up to seven thousand five hundred rupees; Eight rupees and twenty-five paise. and When such amount or value exceeds seven thousand five hundred rupees, for every two hundred and fifty rupees, or part thereof, in excess of seven thousand five hundred rupees, up to thousand rupees; Sixteen rupees and fifty paise. and 32 When such amount or value exceeds ten, thousand rupees, for every five hundred rupees, or part thereof, in excess of ten thousand rupees, up to twenty thousand rupees; Twenty-four rupees and seventy-five paise. and When such amount or value exceeds twenty thousand rupees, for every one thousand rupees, or part thereof in excess of twenty thousand rupees upto fifty thousand rupees; Thirty-three rupees. and When such amount or value exceeds fifty thousand rupees, for every five thousand rupees, or part thereof in exceess of fifty thousand rupees: Forty-one rupees and twenty-five paise. Provided that the maximum fee leviable on a plaint or memorandum of appeal shall not exceed eleven thousand rupees.” (2) for Articles 6, 7, 8 and 9 the following shall be substituted, namely: — “6. Copy or translation of a judgment or order not being or having the force of a decree. When such judgment or order is passed by any Civil Court other than High Court, or by the Presiding Officer of any Revenue Court or officer or by any other Judicial or Executive Authority: (a) if the amount or value of the subject- matter is fifty or less than fifty rupees. One rupee and ten paise. (b) if such amount or value exceeds fifty rupees. Two rupees and twenty paise. (c) when such judgment or order is passed by a High Court. Four rupees and forty paise. 7. Copy of a decree or order having the force of a decree When such decree or order is made by any Civil Court other than a High, Court, or by any Revenue Court— (a) If the amount or value of the subject matter of the suit wherein such decree or order is made is fifty or less than fifty rupees. Two rupees and twenty paise. (b) If such amount or value exceeds fifty rupees. Three rupees and thirty paise. (c) when such decree or order is made by High Court. Eight rupees and twenty-five paise. 33 8. Copy of any document liable to stamp-duty under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Act 2 of 1899), when left by any party to a suit or proceeding in place of the original withdrawn. (a) when the stamp-duty chargeable on the original does not exceed one rupee. The amount of the duty chargeable on the original. (b) In any other case. One rupee and twenty paise.” 9. Copy of any revenue or judicial proceeding or order not otherwise provided for by this Act, or copy of any account, statement, report or the like, taken out of any Civil or Criminal or Revenue Court or office or from the office of any Chief Officer charged with the executive administration of Division. For every three hundred and sixty words or fraction of three hundred and sixty words. One rupee and twenty paise. [Vide Assam Act 28 of 1972, s. 2,]