Assam · 1799 · Act 5
THE BENGAL WILLS AND INTESTACY REGULATION,1799
In forceFull text
This Act is not split into sections here yet, so this is the full text read from its official PDF. Older scans can carry reading errors: check the PDF before you quote it, and for tables and schedules.
38 WILLS AND I N'TES1ACY [ 1799 : Ben. R eg.5.
BENGA L REGULATION 5 or: 1799
(THE BENGAL WtL u-; AND JNn.STA<;Y RI·.Clll.A rroN,
] 799) l
[Jrd At ny 179~ I
A Regulation to limit the interference of the Zila
* *2 Courts of Diwmzi Adalal in execution
of wills and administration to the E <itatcs of
persons dying in t('s tatc.
Prcambl... l. Doubts h..tving been entertained to what C'XIent, ant! in
what manner , the Jutlge of the Zil<t * • Coutts of th,. Dht'am
Adalnt iu the Provinces of 13engal, Bihar, Orissa and B··nares arc·
au thorised to interfere in case~ wh.-1ein the inhabi tants ol the
above Provinces may have left wills .u thei r decrase, and appOint
ed exetuto1s to carry the s:11ne into effect, or may have dted int t·s
tate lc.1ving an E~tatr real or personal ; with a "icw to remove all
doubts on the autho1i t:r ol thr- Lila**' Court~ in such <.l~es, aud
-- - --- . - - -- ... - ---
.1. SHORT T ITLE.-l'h1s short titll' was given by thl" Amending Act,
1897 (V of 11197), since n:pealeJ.
LOCAL EXTENT.-This Regulation WaJ declarcJ, by notifications under
the Scheduled Districts Act, UIH (XI V of 1874) , sectum 3, to be in force in
the following Disrricts namely:-
The Diatricts of Cachar (excl uding Nor.h Cad1ar H ills) , Darrang,
Goalp.ua (excluding the Lasteru Duars), Kamrup, Lakhimpur
:\owgong, Sibsagar and Sylhet, ride 1'\otificauoo No. 71 3-L., uated
27th September, 1937.
2The word' "and City'' which were repealc-cl by Amending Act, 189 1
(Xll of 1891), are omitted.
• The words "and City" which -.. c r .. repe:d~d hy lh<' R1·pc.tlmg Act
18H (XVI of 1874), arc: omitted .
·r
n
Cl
1799: Ben. Reg.5 .] WILLS ANO INT~STACV 39
to apply thereto, as far as possible, the principle "' "' 1 that in
suits re~arding succession and inhetitaHce tne Muhammadan
laws with respect to Muhammadans, and the Hindu laws with
regard to Hindus, be the general rules for the g uidance of the
Judges, the Vice-President in Council has pajsed the following
Regulation, to be considered in force from the period of its
promulgation in the above Provinces respectively.
•2, In all cases of a Hindu, Mussulman or other person Estiuea o•
subject to the jurisdiction of the Zila * • u courts, having at his !Tin d us,
death left a will and appointed an executor or executors to carry Mudha m -d
h . ffi d . I . h I I . h d d ma ana an t e same mto e ec t, an m w l!C t te 1e1r to t e ecease may others not
not he a disqualified landholder subject to the superintendence being dis
of the Court of Wards • • • •' the executors so appointed are qual i fi e d
to take charge of the Estate of the deceased, and proceed in the :an~hold~~·
execution of their tru't accordmg to the will of the deceased and ea\'mst WI ·
the laws and usages of the country, without any application to
the J udge of the Diwani Acalat or any other officer of [the
Governmcnt]5 for his sanction ; and the Courts of J ustice are
prohibited to interfere in such casrs , I'XCept on a regular
complaint against the executors for a breach of trust or other-
wtse , when they are to take cognizance of such complaint in
common with a ll others of a civil nature • • o
*3. Tn case of a Hindu, ;\-fussulman, or other person subject Estates ot
' to the jurisdiction of the Zit a • 7 Couns, dying intestate, but .P"r~on,, tdty.
1 . I l . h b I I f mg m es a e. eavmg a son or ot 1er 1e1r, w o, y t 1e aws o the country, m ay
1 The Wllrdt and ligures "prescri~d in section 15 of Ref(ulation IV, 1793,
ti~ .. .'' which were repealed by the Repelling Act, 1874 (XVI of 18H), arr
Olllltted.
So much of ss. 2 and 3 .u restricts the i ote rferrnce of thl' Givil Courts
in cat~.! ofinheritcnce by minors was repealt•d by Act XL of 1851! \Mtnors).
' The wQrds "and City" which were repeal• d by the Repealin« Act,
1874 (XVI of 1874), are omitted.
' Thr worda and ligures "under Regulation X, 1793, or any other
Regulation relative to thejumdiction of the Court of Wards" which were
reP"·')~ I putly bv the Repeali ng Act, 1874 (XVI of 1874), and partly
by tht Amending Act, 1903 1.1 of 1903) , are omitted.
The word "Go~rnment was substituted by thc- A. 0. 1937 by the words
"'the Crown" ; "Crown" agnin has been substituted by A. 0. 1950.
'
0 The test of s. 2, which wu repealtd by ICe Repealing Act, 1874 (XV!
of 187-1), is omllted.
Th<' wllrds "or C1ty" wh1ch wcH re~"'\lrd by the Hepealmg Acl, 1874
(XVI of 1874), arc omitted .
If l her!' I.e
•
40 \VII LS A:'< 0 I NTES I MW [1799 : Ben. R eg .5.
I If' «"n tilic:d to suu red to the whole estat e of the deccas d, such
lwir , if of age a nd cnm prtcnt to take the possession and manage
Ill nt of the Est He, or, ,,. llr;der age or inrompl'lt>nt and not un·
dt.r th .. Surenntt·nc!enrc of tlw Court of \\'ard~, his guardian
<H ncart·st of kin w ho by SD< cia! appointml'nt or bv the law
a11d usage of the country, may Ut' authorized to act for him, is
not req uired to apply to the Courts of Ju~ticc for permission
to take po~:.cssion of the Estate of the dcrea~rd as far as
th~.: same can be done without vio lence : and the Coutts of
.JuMicc ;ur re~ttictcd from interference i11 s11ch case~., xcept
a r cgul.u complain• bt· pt cfen t d * * u
4 I f thc•r•· IH ruon hrirs than 0111' tf) T1H' F sl.tlt' nf a prn••n
nwre h~ o rs
than one 111 ,I\ Ill" JIIIUI llt', .til I 1 hrr c.ur .t~ l< 'r .Hn•• 1 •-; I l <'Ill ··h-•·; 111 the
Esl'llC <Jf olj);)Oi. ( nt lt n( I ("(1111111011 lllol!lol; ···, they art: 1'. iJ Ot~l ' ((I I tkC'
intestate. P'"'''''illlt, .md 1111: C:"lll t< .. r Just! ·c· an: r~<t•tctrd fr<Hn tntcr-
felt.nce, \\ill1out a rc~ula1 cornpl.1111t, a~ in tlu c 1~c of a single
h<'ir ;
In lwdhar But if the right of ~uccession to till' E•t.ttt' IJ«" disputed lwtwct·n
c:a(,.~ u gr. I 1 f I I " ,,,,,. a;.p,i.nt ~C\'t'ftl c :um;mts, oll t.: nr mole n w 10m m:t;' 1:'1\r ta,..en posses-
fur 'care a11d s.()Jl, th~ J url· •·. n a rt'gular suit bt•ing ,,ref 1 rc1i by the party
adm in j S· Olll Of pos,e:>Sinn, Sll.liJ take ~(IOd ,lnd ~ufTicit:llt S!"t'Ul iLy from the
tr at • on pa1tynr p:trtio 111 posscs:.wn frr Ins or thtil •< npliancc \\ith tht'
managl'meor J d I I I . f . I r l f I .. r &Hat. vf u gmcnt l tat mav >~" passer 111 t w Slll t ; •>r, •n c nau t o sue 1
•nlestatc: security being given witl in a ro:.tson-.ble prriod, may g1ve posses
sic 11, until the smt ma,· be cktt'rmined, to the other claimant 01
cl1imnats ''ho lii·IY be ahle to ~he· such sPC'lllitv, dcr.laring at
the same tinlt' tt.tt ur'l p >~sr-,~iun •~ ro<>l 1 anv clegrre to
affrrt the 1 i~ht ,('property at i<~uc· lwtwet·ll tlw IMI' l ll s. uut to II<·
consi.lt red nwrclv a-; .m administration to the Estate for the
benefit of the hct;s who may on investigation he found c·ntitlcd to
su<.:Ce«"o then·to.
-·---- --- ----·---
J Tlu• worcl~ "wh< n they arc to pro<"~"d thereupon o\('1 C>rdong to th ~·nr-
ral R~'"lllatiom,' which w·rt" rep· ·~lrd by the i\mend111~ \cr. 1?111 (I rof IQtl:l),
are omitted.
1799: Ben Reg. 5 ] W ILLS A:>iD l NT£STA<..Y 41
1 5. I n tht· event of none •)r the claimants to the e sta te of a
person d}ill~ intcstll .. being .tble to ~ivc tlw security required
by the (.>ITtt·dit:~ -.e<.tton, and in a ll c.tses whetcin there may he
no pcrsou attthl)rizcd and wilung tot 1k1· charge' of tlw la nded
estate of :1 peNn dccrase.!, tlw j udgt" w ithin whose jurisd ic tion
1uch cstat<' nt.t} be srtuatc·d \Or in "' hich the dC'cea~cd may h ave
rc~idcd, or the principal part ol the esta te m ay lie, in the events
of its hcinf{ si tu.llc<.l within two or more j m is<.lic tions) is a utho
rizer! to appoin t :wad n inistt·nor lin tfw dtw care and rna n age
mcutofsuch e~tttr, nntil, in thr former case, the:mit d ep e nding
between th•· scvc·ral claimants ~hall kt\T bec·n dbten nin cd , or in
the latter 1 .J~c, unttl the leg-.11 heir to the cstalt, or uthr.r person
entitled to rerl'ivc cl argc: ther col as execu tor, adm inistra tor o r
otherv·t~<:, hair 'lllt:nd and claim the s.mw ; wh~.:n, if t he j udge
be satisfied that titc claim is well found ed , or if thr same b e
establishe-d .tft,·r .trlV inquiry that nay appear necr~sary, the
admimst1a1or appiJ:n trd by thr Cc.Hr t shall cll'f i\·c·r O\rr the
estau· to I i rn, wtth .t ft.ll .l!ld just trcount of all rc c eipts a r;cl
dr tlll ;c 1uents Lilli II~ th•· 1wr iod ol lu-; acl!llllll'tta t 1111 1.
'6. lu a ll inst·1nr.r~ o l .w adnani~trator bt in~· .tppointed S('curity to
under thi, Rt ~tuation, ht• 1s, prcvi•ms to cntt•r i m~ upon the cxecu- l>e ta lt~n
. f I l' . I I I I I 1· I 1· I from and t10n o 11s ul ccc·. to gr\'\: ~c,o< sccurrty •r t ll' .ut 111 c esc rarge nllow
1 11
ces
of his tru~t i11 a .11111 prnp11rtionatl' l•l th ·extent lltcreof ; nd the paid 10
judgc· appurnllnt~ hem is .luthori7 ·d t" It" lot him (su bjC'ct to the .ttlmi nislra
approh.rt•on or tlu C..:Ciurt ol Sachu Diw.111i Adalat, to who m a tu n .
report 1 to 11 11 'ldc• in such tn~t. nC'cs) an adequate persona l
allowance to lw rMid out ul' t he p rocc• ds o lr hc <'sta te, nnd to be
a pen:entat•' thrll'llj)flll, alt<-1 d <luetin~ t lw rxpr.us··~ ol manage·
ment.
---
S , .111d IJ h.Ht' he~n modal rtl bv the l:lengal ,\UM.il~tl Lstro.lel M•nag~
mcnt Regulauvu, ltl:l7 (\ ot ltl~7), jJ<Jst.
Procedure in
c .tscs ol per·
sons dying
inUI!ate
lea ving per·
sonal proper
t y to which,
there is no
claimant.
Saving c,f
J urisdictioa
or Court ot
Wards.
42 WILL~ AND ! NT.I:.STAGY [1799: Ben. R eg. 5.
7. The Judges of the Zila "' * J. C.:ourts, on rrCt'IVIng
in forma con that any person \\ i thin their respective j ut i~diction
has died intestate leaving personal property, and that there is no
claimant to such properly, are to adopt such mea~un~s ;,s may be
ueressary fo1 thr: t emporary care of the propt>rty, a nti to is ue an
advertisement in the curren t languages oft he country requiring
the heir or the d eceased, or a ny person en titlC'd to rccc:i• c chargc:
nf his effects, to a ttend for· thts purpose.
Such adverllsement to be published 011 th ·· spo• where Lire
property was fi unci, at the Diwani Adala t n ttcherry of the zila *
• 1 , and ifasccrtainable at the dwe-lling pl.1re of the dec1·il~ed •
• • ~ ; after which, should any person attend a nd mtisly the
judge of his title to the property, or to receive charge thereof as
executor, admini,tralor or otherwise, the: same- i3 to bf' ddivered
up to him, on tf'paymt>n t 01 :.111y nt>el'ssary cxpt·nst· incurred in
the carC' of it.
Should nn claim be prekrred within the twelve months next
ensuing, an inventory of tht> property and report or tht' c ircunt
stanccs or I he case is I() be tra nsmit trd to drc t Board of Reve
nue, or , in Assam, to the [stale:: I H Govrrnme11t lot its I orders.
U. ~othing in this H.egu lation is to be' under~tnod to limit
or alter the juri~diction of the Coul't of W:~rrls • in the: .tppoi u t·
ment of managers nr guardians lor * .~c -. dtsqualdied lantllroldc:rs,
••e or in any case wherein a special power may he \csted in the
Court ot w a ,·ds. •• 7
IThc words "or City" which were rC'pe:lled l>y the Rrpealin,.: ct,
1814 (XVI ot 181l), .ue orniu ed.
The words ' 'or, tf the deccasecl wtre an J :u rop~au, lll tbc Co~. lcutta
Gazette" which were rep .. a led by the Amending Act, l 'lu3 (I ot 1903), .; re
omiltcd.
These words were substituted hy t ;le Decentralization Act, 19 14 ( I V
of 1914), for the word• "Local Government" for ''iu," w~tch by the Amendin~
Act 1903 (1 of 1•)03), Schedule 11, bad l>een substituted for the words
'·G~vc-rnor General in Council" for "his". The term " Local Govrrnmenr"
wu ,ubstituted by the trrm "Provincial GO\ernment" by the Adapcation
Order, 1937.
j
(
• For the pr~nt law u to the Court ot Wards in \ssam, .>tt the Cuurt
of Warda Act, 1819 /Ben. Act lX of 1879), post .
• - The word "the" thr words and hgurCJ " dacribcd in Rrgula- ur
tion X , 1793," and the wort.ls ''by the aoo\ e or an) other Regulation, fo
respec tively, which were n•pealed by the ){<'pealing i\<t, 1871 (XVI ol 11174
N ~ore omiued.
• Subslilfllld for the wo~d "l'rovinci~o l " by A. 0., l '.150.