Chandigarh · 1996 · Act 26
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
In forceFull text
This Act is not split into sections here yet, so this is the full text read from its official PDF. Older scans can carry reading errors: check the PDF before you quote it, and for tables and schedules.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
UNION OF INDIA
India
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Act 26 of 1996
Published in Gazette 26 on 22 August 1996•
Assented to on 22 August 1996•
Commenced on 22 August 1996•
[This is the version of this document at 12 March 2021.]•
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996(26 of 1996)An Act to consolidate and amend the law
relating to domestic arbitration, international commercial arbitration and enforcement of foreign
arbitral awards as also to define the law relating to conciliation and for matters connected therewith
or incidental thereto.Preamble. - Whereas the United Nations Commission on International Trade
Law (UNCITRAL) has adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
in 1985;And Whereas the General Assembly of the United Nations has recommended that all
countries give due consideration to the said Model Law, in view of the desirability of uniformity of
the law of arbitral procedures and the specific needs of international commercial arbitration
practice;And Whereas the UNCITRAL has adopted the UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules in 1980;And
Whereas the General Assembly of the United Nations has recommended the use of the said Rules in
cases where a dispute arises in the context of international commercial relations and the parties seek
an amicable settlement of that dispute by recourse to conciliation;And Whereas the said Model Law
and Rules make significant contribution to the establishment of a unified legal framework for the
fair and efficient settlement of disputes arising in international commercial relations;And Whereas
it is expedient to make law respecting arbitration and conciliation, taking into account the aforesaid
Model Law and Rules;Be it enacted by Parliament in the forty seventh year of the Republic as
follows:Preliminary
1. Short title, extent and commencement.
(1)This Act may be called The Arbitration and Conciliation Act , 1996.(2)It extends to the whole of
India:Provided that Parts I, III and IV shall extend to the State of Jammu and Kashmir only in so far
as they relate to international commercial arbitration or, as the case may be, international
commercial conciliation.Explanation. - In this sub-section, the expression international commercial
conciliation shall have the same meaning as the expression international commercial arbitration in
clause (f) of sub-section (1) of section 2, subject to the modification that for the word arbitration
occurring therein, the word conciliation shall be substituted.(3)It shall come into force on such
[date] as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 1
Part I – Arbitration
Chapter I
General Provisions
2. Definitions.
(1)In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,(a)arbitration means any arbitration whether
or not administered by permanent arbitral institution;(b)arbitration agreement means an
agreement referred to in section 7;(c)arbitral award includes an interim award;(ca)[ "arbitral
institution" means an arbitral institution designated by the Supreme Court or a High Court under
this Act;] [Inserted by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.](d)arbitral tribunal means a sole
arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators;(e)[ "Court" means- [Substituted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated
31.12.2015.](i)in the case of an arbitration other than international commercial arbitration, the
principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in a district, and includes the High Court in exercise of
its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, having jurisdiction to decide the questions forming the
subject-matter of the arbitration if the same had been the subject-matter of a suit, but does not
include any Civil Court of a grade inferior to such principal Civil Court, or any Court of Small
Causes;(ii)in the case of international commercial arbitration, the High Court in exercise of its
ordinary original civil jurisdiction, having jurisdiction to decide the questions forming the
subject-matter of the arbitration if the same had been the subject-matter of a suit, and in other
cases, a High Court having jurisdiction to hear appeals from decrees of courts subordinate to that
High Court;](f)international commercial arbitration means an arbitration relating to disputes
arising out of legal relationships, whether contractual or not, considered as commercial under the
law in force in India and where at least one of the parties is(i)an individual who is a national of, or
habitually resident in, any country other than India; or(ii)a body corporate which is incorporated in
any country other than India; or(iii)[* * *] [Omitted words 'a company or' by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated
31.12.2015.] an association or a body of individuals whose central management and control is
exercised in any country other than India; or(iv)the Government of a foreign country;(g)legal
representative means a person who in law represents the estate of a deceased person, and includes
any person who inter-meddles with the estate of the deceased, and, where a party acts in a
representative character, the person on whom the estate devolves on the death of the party so
acting;(h)party means a party to an arbitration agreement.(i)[ "prescribed" means prescribed by
rules made under this Act; [Inserted by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.](j)"regulations" means
the regulations made by the Council under this Act.]Scope(2)This Part shall apply where the place
of arbitration is in India.[Provided that subject to an agreement to the contrary, the provisions of
sections 9, 27 and [clause (b)] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.] of sub-section (1)
and sub-section (3) of section 37 shall also apply to international commercial arbitration, even if the
place of arbitration is outside India, and an arbitral award made or to be made in such place is
enforceable and recognised under the provisions of Part II of this Act.](3)This Part shall not affect
any other law for the time being in force by virtue of which certain disputes may not be submitted to
arbitration.(4)This Part except sub-section (1) of section 40, sections 41 and 43 shall apply to every
arbitration under any other enactment for the time being in force, as if the arbitration were pursuant
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 2
to an arbitration agreement and as if that other enactment were an arbitration agreement, except
insofar as the provisions of this Part are inconsistent with that other enactment or with any rules
made thereunder.(5)Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), and save insofar as is otherwise
provided by any law for the time being in force or in any agreement in force between India and any
other country or countries, this Part shall apply to all arbitration's and to all proceedings relating
thereto.Construction Of References(6)Where this Part, except section 28, leaves the parties free to
determine a certain issue, that freedom shall include the right of the parties to authorise any person
including an institution, to determine that issue.(7)An arbitral award made under this Part shall be
considered as a domestic award.(8)Where this Part(a)refers to the fact that the parties have agreed
or that they may agree, or(b)in any other way refers to an agreement of the parties,that agreement
shall include any arbitration rules referred to in that agreement.(9)Where this Part, other than
clause (a) of section 25 or clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 32, refers to a claim, it shall also
apply to a counter-claim, and where it refers to a defence, it shall also apply to a defence to that
counter-claim.STATE AMENDMENTS
[Uttar Pradesh.]- In Section 2 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996, in sub-section (1), for
clause (e), the following clause shall be substituted, namely -"(e) 'Court' means the principal Civil
Court of original jurisdiction in a district, which shall include the court of the Additional District
Judge where so assigned by the District Judge and includes the High Court in exercise of its
ordinary original civil jurisdiction, having jurisdiction to the decide the questions forming the
subject-matter of the arbitration if the same had been the subject-matter of suit, or any Court of
Small Causes.". [U.P. Act No. 16 of 2019].
3. Receipt of written communications.
(1)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties,(a)any written communication is deemed to have been
received if it is delivered to the addressee personally or at his place of business, habitual residence or
mailing address, and(b)if none of the places referred to in clause (a) can be found after making a
reasonable inquiry, a written communication is deemed to have been received if it is sent to the
addressees last known place of business, habitual residence or mailing address by registered letter
or by any other means which provides a record of the attempt to deliver it.(2)The communication is
deemed to have been received on the day it is so delivered.(3)This section does not apply to written
communications in respect of proceedings of any judicial authority.
4. Waiver of right to object.
- A party who knows that(a)any provision of this Part from which the parties may derogate, or(b)any
requirement under the arbitration agreement,has not been complied with and yet proceeds with the
arbitration without stating his objection to such non-compliance without undue delay or, if a time
limit is provided for stating that objection, within that period of time, shall be deemed to have
waived his right to so object.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 3
5. Extent of judicial intervention.
- Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, in matters
governed by this Part, no judicial authority shall intervene except where so provided in this Part.
6. Administrative assistance.
- In order to facilitate the conduct of the arbitral proceedings, the parties, or the arbitral tribunal
with the consent of the parties, may arrange for administrative assistance by a suitable institution or
person.
Chapter II
Arbitration Agreement
7. Arbitration agreement.
(1)In this Part, arbitration agreement means an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all
or certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal
relationship, whether contractual or not.(2)An arbitration agreement may be in the form of an
arbitration clause in a contract or in the form of a separate agreement.(3)An arbitration agreement
shall be in writing.(4)An arbitration agreement is in writing if it is contained in(a)a document signed
by the parties;(b)an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommunication
[including communication through electronic means] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated
31.12.2015.] which provide a record of the agreement; or(c)an exchange of statements of claim and
defence in which the existence of the agreement is alleged by one party and not denied by the
other.(5)The reference in a contract to a document containing an arbitration clause constitutes an
arbitration agreement if the contract is in writing and the reference is such as to make that
arbitration clause part of the contract.
8. Power to refer parties to arbitration where there is an arbitration
agreement.
- [(1) A judicial authority, before which an action is brought in a matter which is the subject of an
arbitration agreement shall, if a party to the arbitration agreement or any person claiming through
or under him, so applies not later than the date of submitting his first statement on the substance of
the dispute, then, notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of the Supreme Court or any
Court, refer the parties to arbitration unless it finds that prima facie no valid arbitration agreement
exists.] [Substituted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.](2)The application referred to in
sub-section (1) shall not be entertained unless it is accompanied by the original arbitration
agreement or a duly certified copy thereof.[Provided that where the original arbitration agreement
or a certified copy thereof is not available with the party applying for reference to arbitration under
sub-section (1), and the said agreement or certified copy is retained by the other party to that
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 4
agreement, then, the party so applying shall file such application along with a copy of the arbitration
agreement and a petition praying the Court to call upon the other party to produce the original
arbitration agreement or its duly certified copy before that Court.] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016
dated 31.12.2015.](3)Notwithstanding that an application has been made under sub-section (1) and
that the issue is pending before the judicial authority, an arbitration may be commenced or
continued and an arbitral award made.
9. Interim measures, etc., by Court.
- [(1)] [Renumbered as sub-section (1) by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.] A party may, before
or during arbitral proceedings or at any time after the making of the arbitral award but before it is
enforced in accordance with section 36, apply to a Court:(i)for the appointment of a guardian for a
minor or a person of unsound mind for the purposes of arbitral proceedings; or(ii)for an interim
measure of protection in respect of any of the following matters, namely:(a)the preservation, interim
custody or sale of any goods which are the subject-matter of the arbitration agreement;(b)securing
the amount in dispute in the arbitration;(c)the detention, preservation or inspection of any property
or thing which is the subject-matter of the dispute in arbitration, or as to which any question may
arise therein and authorising for any of the aforesaid purposes any person to enter upon any land or
building in the possession of any party, or authorising any samples to be taken or any observation to
be made, or experiment to be tried, which may be necessary or expedient for the purpose of
obtaining full information or evidence;(d)interim injunction or the appointment of a
receiver;(e)such other interim measure of protection as may appear to the Court to be just and
convenient,and the Court shall have the same power for making orders as it has for the purpose of,
and in relation to, any proceedings before it.(2)[ Where, before the commencement of the arbitral
proceedings, a Court passes an order for any interim measure of protection under sub-section (1),
the arbitral proceedings shall be commenced within a period of ninety days from the date of such
order or within such further time as the Court may determine.(3)Once the arbitral tribunal has been
constituted, the Court shall not entertain an application under sub-section (1), unless the Court
finds that circumstances exist which may not render the remedy provided under section 17
efficacious.] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.]
Chapter III
Composition Of Arbitral Tribunal
10. Number of arbitrators.
(1)The parties are free to determine the number of arbitrators, provided that such number shall not
be an even number.(2)Failing the determination referred to in sub-section (1), the arbitral tribunal
shall consist of a sole arbitrator.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 5
11. Appointment of arbitrators.
(1)A person of any nationality may be an arbitrator, unless otherwise agreed by the
parties.(2)Subject to sub-section (6), the parties are free to agree on a procedure for appointing the
arbitrator or arbitrators.(3)Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (2), in an arbitration
with three arbitrators, each party shall appoint one arbitrator, and the two appointed arbitrators
shall appoint the third arbitrator who shall act as the presiding arbitrator.(3A)[ The Supreme Court
and the High Court shall have the power to designate, arbitral institutions, from time to time, which
have been graded by the Council under section 43-I, for the purposes of this Act:Provided that in
respect of those High Court jurisdictions, where no graded arbitral institution are available, then,
the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court may maintain a panel of arbitrators for discharging
the functions and duties of arbitral institution and any reference to the arbitrator shall be deemed to
be an arbitral institution for the purposes of this section and the arbitrator appointed by a party
shall be entitled to such fee at the rate as specified in the Fourth Schedule:Provided further that the
Chief Justice of the concerned High Court may, from time to time, review the panel of arbitrators.]
[Inserted by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.](4)If the appointment procedure in sub-section (3)
applies and(a)a party fails to appoint an arbitrator within thirty days from the receipt of a request to
do so from the other party; or(b)the two appointed arbitrators fail to agree on the third arbitrator
within thirty days from the date of their appointment, [the appointment shall be made, on an
application of the party, by the arbitral institution designated by the Supreme Court, in case of
international commercial arbitration, or by the High Court, in case of arbitrations other than
international commercial arbitration, as the case may be] [Substituted by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated
9.8.2019.].(5)Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (2), in an arbitration with a sole
arbitrator, if the parties fail to agree on the arbitrator within thirty days from receipt of a request by
one party from the other party to so agree [the appointment shall be made on an application of the
party in accordance with the provisions contained in sub-section (4).] [Substituted by Act No. 33 of
2019, dated 9.8.2019.].(6)Where, under an appointment procedure agreed upon by the parties.(a)a
party fails to act as required under that procedure; or(b)the parties, or the two appointed
arbitrators, fail to reach an agreement expected of them under that procedure; or(c)a person,
including an institution, fails to perform any function entrusted to him or it under that procedure, a
[the appointment shall be made, on an application of the party, by the arbitral institution designated
by the Supreme Court, in case of international commercial arbitration, or by the High Court, in case
of arbitrations other than international commercial arbitration, as the case may be] [Substituted by
Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.] to take the necessary measure, unless the agreement on the
appointment procedure provides other means for securing the appointment.(6A)[ ***] [Omitted
'(6A) The Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court, while considering any application
under sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) or sub-section (6), shall, notwithstanding any judgment,
decree or order of any Court, confine to the examination of the existence of an arbitration
agreement' by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.](6B)[ The designation of any person or institution
by the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court, for the purposes of this section shall
not be regarded as a delegation of judicial power by the Supreme Court or the High Court.] [Inserted
by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.](7)[ ***] [Omitted '(7) A decision on a matter entrusted by
sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) or sub-section (6) to the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the
High Court or the person or institution designated by such Court is final and no appeal including
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 6
Letters Patent Appeal shall lie against such decision' by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.](8)[
[The arbitral institution referred to in sub-sections (4), (5) and (6)] [Substituted by Act No. 3 of
2016 dated 31.12.2015.], before appointing an arbitrator, shall seek a disclosure in writing from the
prospective arbitrator in terms of sub-section (1) of section 12, and have due regard to-(a)any
qualifications required for the arbitrator by the agreement of the parties; and(b)the contents of the
disclosure and other considerations as are likely to secure the appointment of an independent and
impartial arbitrator.](9)In the case of appointment of sole or third arbitrator in an international
commercial arbitration, [the arbitral institution designated by the Supreme Court] [Substituted 'the
Supreme Court or the person or institution designated by that Court' by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated
9.8.2019.] may appoint an arbitrator of a nationality other than the nationalities of the parties
where the parties belong to different nationalities.(10)[ ***] [Omitted '(10) The Supreme Court or,
as the case may be, the High Court, may make such scheme as the said Court may deem appropriate
for dealing with matters entrusted by sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) or sub-section (6), to it.' by
Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.](11)[ Where more than one request has been made under
sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) or sub-section (6) to different arbitral institutions, the arbitral
institution to which the request has been first made under the relevant sub-section shall be
competent to appoint.(12)Where the matter referred to in sub-sections (4), (5), (6) and (8) arise in
an international commercial arbitration or any other arbitration, the reference to the arbitral
institution in those sub-sections shall be construed as a reference to the arbitral institution
designated under sub-section (3A).(13)An application made under this section for appointment of
an arbitrator or arbitrators shall be disposed of by the arbitral institution within a period of thirty
days from the date of service of notice on the opposite party.(14)The arbitral institution shall
determine the fees of the arbitral tribunal and the manner of its payment to the arbitral tribunal
subject to the rates specified in the Fourth Schedule.Explanation. - For the removal of doubts, it is
hereby clarified that this sub-section shall not apply to international commercial arbitration and in
arbitration's (other than international commercial arbitration) where parties have agreed for
determination of fees as per the rules of an arbitral institution.] [Substituted by Act No. 33 of 2019,
dated 9.8.2019.]
11A. [ Power of Central Government to amend Fourth Schedule. [Inserted by
Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.]
(1)If the Central Government is satisfied that it is necessary or expedient so to do, it may, by
notification in the Official Gazette, amend the Fourth Schedule and thereupon the Fourth Schedule
shall be deemed to have been amended accordingly.(2)A copy of every notification proposed to be
issued under sub-section (1), shall be laid in draft before each House of Parliament, while it is in
session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more
successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the
successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in disapproving the issue of the notification or both
Houses agree in making any modification in the notification, the notification shall not be issued or,
as the case may be, shall be issued only in such modified form as may be agreed upon by the both
Houses of Parliament.]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 7
12. Grounds for challenge
- [(1) When a person is approached in connection with his possible appointment as an arbitrator, he
shall disclose in writing any circumstances,-(a)such as the existence either direct or indirect, of any
past or present relationship with or interest in any of the parties or in relation to the subject-matter
in dispute, whether financial, business, professional or other kind, which is likely to give rise to
justifiable doubts as to his independence or impartiality; and(b)which are likely to affect his ability
to devote sufficient time to the arbitration and in particular his ability to complete the entire
arbitration within a period of twelve months.Explanation 1. - The grounds stated in the Fifth
Schedule shall guide in determining whether circumstances exist which give rise to justifiable
doubts as to the independence or impartiality of an arbitrator.Explanation 2. - The disclosure shall
be made by such person in the form specified in the Sixth Schedule.] [Substituted by Act No. 3 of
2016 dated 31.12.2015.](2)An arbitrator, from the time of his appointment and throughout the
arbitral proceedings, shall, without delay, disclose to the parties in writing any circumstances
referred to in sub-section (1) unless they have already been informed of them by him.(3)An
arbitrator may be challenged only if.(a)circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to
his independence or impartiality, or(b)he does not possess the qualifications agreed to by the
parties.(4)A party may challenge an arbitrator appointed by him, or in whose appointment he has
participated, only for reasons of which he becomes aware after the appointment has been made.(5)[
Notwithstanding any prior agreement to the contrary, any person whose relationship, with the
parties or counsel or the subject-matter of the dispute, falls under any of the categories specified in
the Seventh Schedule shall be ineligible to be appointed as an arbitrator:Provided that parties may,
subsequent to disputes having arisen between them, waive the applicability of this sub-section by an
express agreement in writing.] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.]
13. Challenge procedure.
(1)Subject to sub-section (4), the parties are free to agree on a procedure for challenging an
arbitrator.(2)Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (1), a party who intends to challenge
an arbitrator shall, within fifteen days after becoming aware of the constitution of the arbitral
tribunal or after becoming aware of any circumstances referred to in sub-section (3) of section 12,
send a written statement of the reasons for the challenge to the arbitral tribunal.(3)Unless the
arbitrator challenged under sub-section (2) withdraws from his office or the other party agrees to
the challenge, the arbitral tribunal shall decide on the challenge.(4)If a challenge under any
procedure agreed upon by the parties or under the procedure under sub-section (2) is not
successful, the arbitral tribunal shall continue the arbitral proceedings and make an arbitral
award.(5)Where an arbitral award is made under sub-section (4), the party challenging the
arbitrator may make an application for setting aside such an arbitral award in accordance with
section 34.(6)Where an arbitral award is set aside on an application made under sub-section (5), the
Court may decide as to whether the arbitrator who is challenged is entitled to any fees.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 8
14. Failure or impossibility to act.
- [(1) The mandate of an arbitrator shall terminate and he shall be substituted by another arbitrator,
if'] [Substituted for the words 'The mandate of an arbitrator shall terminate if' by Act No. 3 of 2016
dated 31.12.2015.](a)he becomes de jure or de facto unable to perform his functions or for other
reasons fails to act without undue delay; and(b)he withdraws from his office or the parties agree to
the termination of his mandate.(2)If a controversy remains concerning any of the grounds referred
to in clause (a) of sub-section (1), a party may, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, apply to the
Court to decide on the termination of the mandate.(3)If, under this section or sub-section (3) of
section 13, an arbitrator withdraws from his office or a party agrees to the termination of the
mandate of an arbitrator, it shall not imply acceptance of the validity of any ground referred to in
this section or sub-section (3) of section 12.
15. Termination of mandate and substitution of arbitrator.
(1)In addition to the circumstances referred to in section 13 or section 14, the mandate of an
arbitrator shall terminate(a)where he withdraws from office for any reason; or(b)by or pursuant to
agreement of the parties.(2)Where the mandate of an arbitrator terminates, a substitute arbitrator
shall be appointed according to the rules that were applicable to the appointment of the arbitrator
being replaced.(3)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where an arbitrator is replaced under
sub-section (2), any hearings previously held may be repeated at the discretion of the arbitral
tribunal.(4)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, an order or ruling of the arbitral tribunal made
prior to the replacement of an arbitrator under this section shall not be invalid solely because there
has been a change in the composition of the arbitral tribunal.
Chapter IV
Jurisdiction Of Arbitral Tribunals
16. Competence of arbitral tribunal to rule on its jurisdiction.
(1)The arbitral tribunal may rule on its own jurisdiction, including ruling on any objections with
respect to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement, and for that purpose,(a)an
arbitration clause which forms part of a contract shall be treated as an agreement independent of
the other terms of the contract; and(b)a decision by the arbitral tribunal that the contract is null and
void shall not entail ipso jure the invalidity of the arbitration clause.(2)A plea that the arbitral
tribunal does not have jurisdiction shall be raised not later than the submission of the statement of
defence; however, a party shall not be precluded from raising such a plea merely because that he has
appointed, or participated in the appointment of, an arbitrator.(3)A plea that the arbitral tribunal is
exceeding the scope of its authority shall be raised as soon as the matter alleged to be beyond the
scope of its authority is raised during the arbitral proceedings.(4)The arbitral tribunal may, in either
of the cases referred to in sub-section (2) or sub-section (3), admit a later plea if it considers the
delay justified.(5)The arbitral tribunal shall decide on a plea referred to in sub-section (2) or
sub-section (3) and, where the arbitral tribunal takes a decision rejecting the plea, continue with the
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 9
arbitral proceedings and make an arbitral award.(6)A party aggrieved by such an arbitral award may
make an application for setting aside such an arbitral award in accordance with section 34.
17. [ Interim measures ordered by arbitral tribunal. [Substituted by Act No. 3
of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.]
(1)A party may, during the arbitral proceedings [***], apply to the arbitral tribunal-(i)for the
appointment of a guardian for a minor or person of unsound mind for the purposes of arbitral
proceedings; or(ii)for an interim measure of protection in respect of any of the following matters,
namely:-(a)the preservation, interim custody or sale of any goods which are the subject-matter of
the arbitration agreement;(b)securing the amount in dispute in the arbitration;(c)the detention,
preservation or inspection of any property or thing which is the subject-matter of the dispute in
arbitration, or as to which any question may arise therein and authorising for any of the aforesaid
purposes any person to enter upon any land or building in the possession of any party, or
authorising any samples to be taken, or any observation to be made, or experiment to be tried,
which may be necessary or expedient for the purpose of obtaining full information or
evidence;(d)interim injunction or the appointment of a receiver;(e)such other interim measure of
protection as may appear to the arbitral tribunal to be just and convenient, and the arbitral tribunal
shall have the same power for making orders, as the court has for the purpose of, and in relation to,
any proceedings before it.(2)Subject to any orders passed in an appeal under section 37, any order
issued by the arbitral tribunal under this section shall be deemed to be an order of the Court for all
purposes and shall be enforceable under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in the same manner as if
it were an order of the Court.]
17. Interim measures ordered by arbitral tribunal.- (1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the
arbitral tribunal may, at the request of a party, order a party to take any interim measure of
protection as the arbitral tribunal may consider necessary in respect of the subject-matter of the
dispute.(2) The arbitral tribunal may require a party to provide appropriate security in connection
with a measure ordered under sub-section (1).
Chapter V
Conduct Of Arbitral Proceedings
18. Equal treatment of parties.
- The parties shall be treated with equality and each party shall be given a full opportunity to present
his case.
19. Determination of rules of procedure.
(1)The arbitral tribunal shall not be bound by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or the
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872).(2)Subject to this Part, the parties are free to agree on the
procedure to be followed by the arbitral tribunal in conducting its proceedings.(3)Failing any
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 10
agreement referred to in sub-section (2), the arbitral tribunal may, subject to this Part, conduct the
proceedings in the manner it considers appropriate.(4)The power of the arbitral tribunal under
sub-section (3) includes the power to determine the admissibility, relevance, materiality and weight
of any evidence.
20. Place of arbitration.
(1)The parties are free to agree on the place of arbitration.(2)Failing any agreement referred to in
sub-section (1), the place of arbitration shall be determined by the arbitral tribunal having regard to
the circumstances of the case, including the convenience of the parties.(3)Notwithstanding
sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), the arbitral tribunal may, unless otherwise agreed by the parties,
meet at any place it considers appropriate for consultation among its members, for hearing
witnesses, experts or the parties, or for inspection of documents, goods or other property.
21. Commencement of arbitral proceedings.
- Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral proceedings in respect of a particular dispute
commence on the date on which a request for that dispute to be referred to arbitration is received by
the respondent.
22. Language.
(1)The parties are free to agree upon the language or languages to be used in the arbitral
proceedings.(2)Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (1), the arbitral tribunal shall
determine the language or languages to be used in the arbitral proceedings.(3)The agreement or
determination, unless otherwise specified, shall apply to any written statement by a party, any
hearing and any arbitral award, decision or other communication by the arbitral tribunal.(4)The
arbitral tribunal may order that any documentary evidence shall be accompanied by a translation
into the language or languages agreed upon by the parties or determined by the arbitral tribunal.
23. Statements of claim and defence.
(1)Within the period of time agreed upon by the parties or determined by the arbitral tribunal, the
claimant shall state the facts supporting his claim, the points at issue and the relief or remedy
sought, and the respondent shall state his defence in respect of these particulars, unless the parties
have otherwise agreed as to the required elements of those statements.(2)The parties may submit
with their statements all documents they consider to be relevant or may add a reference to the
documents or other evidence they will submit.(2A)[ The respondent, in support of his case, may also
submit a counterclaim or plead a set-off, which shall be adjudicated upon by the arbitral tribunal, if
such counterclaim or set-off falls within the scope of the arbitration agreement.] [Inserted by Act
No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.](3)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, either party may amend
or supplement his claim or defence during the course of the arbitral proceedings, unless the arbitral
tribunal considers it inappropriate to allow the amendment or supplement having regard to the
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 11
delay in making it.(4)[ The statement of claim and defence under this section shall be completed
within a period of six months from the date the arbitrator or all the arbitrators, as the case may be,
received notice, in writing, of their appointment.] [Inserted by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.]
24. Hearings and written proceedings.
(1)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal shall decide whether to hold oral
hearings for the presentation of evidence or for oral argument, or whether the proceedings shall be
conducted on the basis of documents and other materials:Provided that the arbitral tribunal shall
hold oral hearings, at an appropriate stage of the proceedings, on a request by a party, unless the
parties have agreed that no oral hearing shall be held.[Provided further that the arbitral tribunal
shall, as far as possible, hold oral hearings for the presentation of evidence or for oral argument on
day-to-day basis, and not grant any adjournments unless sufficient cause is made out, and may
impose costs including exemplary costs on the party seeking adjournment without any sufficient
cause.] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.](2)The parties shall be given sufficient
advance notice of any hearing and of any meeting of the arbitral tribunal for the purposes of
inspection of documents, goods or other property.(3)All statements, documents or other
information supplied to, or applications made to the arbitral tribunal by one party shall be
communicated to the other party, and any expert report or evidentiary document on which the
arbitral tribunal may rely in making its decision shall be communicated to the parties.
25. Default of a party.
- Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where, without showing sufficient cause,(a)the claimant
fails to communicate his statement of claim in accordance with sub-section (1) of section 23, the
arbitral tribunal shall terminate the proceedings;(b)the respondent fails to communicate his
statement of defence in accordance with sub-section (1) of section 23, the arbitral tribunal shall
continue the proceedings without treating that failure in itself as an admission of the allegations by
the claimant [and shall have the discretion to treat the right of the respondent to file such statement
of defence as having been forfeited] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.];(c)a party fails
to appear at an oral hearing or to produce documentary evidence, the arbitral tribunal may continue
the proceedings and make the arbitral award on the evidence before it.
26. Expert appointment by arbitral tribunal.
(1)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may(a)appoint one or more experts
to report to it on specific issues to be determined by the arbitral tribunal, and(b)require a party to
give the expert any relevant information or to produce, or to provide access to, any relevant
documents, goods or other property for his inspection.(2)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, if a
party so requests or if the arbitral tribunal considers it necessary, the expert shall, after delivery of
his written or oral report, participate in an oral hearing where the parties have the opportunity to
put questions to him and to present expert witnesses in order to testify on the points at
issue.(3)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the expert shall, on the request of a party, make
available to that party for examination all documents, goods or other property in the possession of
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 12
the expert with which he was provided in order to prepare his report.
27. Court assistance in taking evidence.
(1)The arbitral tribunal, or a party with the approval of the arbitral tribunal, may apply to the Court
for assistance in taking evidence.(2)The application shall specify(a)the names and addresses of the
parties and the arbitrators;(b)the general nature of the claim and the relief sought;(c)the evidence to
be obtained, in particular,(i)the name and address of any person to be heard as witness or expert
witness and a statement of the subject-matter of the testimony required;(ii)the description of any
document to be produced or property to be inspected.(3)The Court may, within its competence and
according to its rules on taking evidence, execute the request by ordering that the evidence be
provided directly to the arbitral tribunal.(4)The Court may, while making an order under
sub-section (3), issue the same processes to witnesses as it may issue in suits tried before
it.(5)Persons failing to attend in accordance with such process, or making any other default, or
refusing to give their evidence, or guilty of any contempt to the arbitral tribunal during the conduct
of arbitral proceedings, shall be subject to the like disadvantages, penalties and punishments by
order of the Court on the representation of the arbitral tribunal as they would incur for the like
offences in suits tried before the Court.(6)In this section the expression Processes includes
summonses and commissions for the examination of witnesses and summonses to produce
documents.
Chapter VI
Making Of Arbitral Award And Termination Of Proceedings
28. Rules applicable to substance of dispute.
(1)Where the place of arbitration is situate in India,(a)in an arbitration other than an international
commercial arbitration, the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute submitted to arbitration in
accordance with the substantive law for the time being in force in India;(b)in international
commercial arbitration,(i)the arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute in accordance with the rules
of law designated by the parties as applicable to the substance of the dispute;(ii)any designation by
the parties of the law or legal system of a given country shall be construed, unless otherwise
expressed, as directly referring to the substantive law of that country and not to its conflict of laws
rules;(iii)failing any designation of the law under clause (a) by the parties, the arbitral tribunal shall
apply the rules of law it considers to be appropriate given all the circumstances surrounding the
dispute.(2)The arbitral tribunal shall decide ex aequo et bono or as amiable compositeur only if the
parties have expressly authorised it to do so.(3)[ While deciding and making an award, the arbitral
tribunal shall, in all cases, take into account the terms of the contract and trade usages applicable to
the transaction.] [Substituted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 13
29. Decision making by panel of arbitrators.
(1)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, in arbitral proceedings with more than one arbitrator, any
decision of the arbitral tribunal shall be made by a majority of all its members.(2)Notwithstanding
sub-section (1), if authorised by the parties or all the members of the arbitral tribunal, questions of
procedure may be decided by the presiding arbitrator.
29A. [ Time limit for arbitral award. [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated
31.12.2015.]
- [(1) The award in matters other than international commercial arbitration shall be made by the
arbitral tribunal within a period of twelve months from the date of completion of pleadings under
sub-section (4) of section 23:Provided that the award in the matter of international commercial
arbitration may be made as expeditiously as possible and endeavour may be made to dispose of the
matter within a period of twelve months from the date of completion of pleadings under sub-section
(4) of section 23.](2)If the award is made within a period of six months from the date the arbitral
tribunal enters upon the reference, the arbitral tribunal shall be entitled to receive such amount of
additional fees as the parties may agree.(3)The parties may, by consent, extend the period specified
in sub-section (1) for making award for a further period not exceeding six months.(4)If the award is
not made within the period specified in sub-section (1) or the extended period specified under
sub-section (3), the mandate of the arbitrator(s) shall terminate unless the Court has, either prior to
or after the expiry of the period so specified, extended the period:Provided that while extending the
period under this sub-section, if the Court finds that the proceedings have been delayed for the
reasons attributable to the arbitral tribunal, then, it may order reduction of fees of arbitrator(s) by
not exceeding five per cent. for each month of such delay.[Provided further that where an
application under sub-section (5) is pending, the mandate of the arbitrator shall continue till the
disposal of the said application:Provided also that the arbitrator shall be given an opportunity of
being heard before the fees is reduced.] [Inserted by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.](5)The
extension of period referred to in sub-section (4) may be on the application of any of the parties and
may be granted only for sufficient cause and on such terms and conditions as may be imposed by the
Court.(6)While extending the period referred to in sub-section (4), it shall be open to the Court to
substitute one or all of the arbitrators and if one or all of the arbitrators are substituted, the arbitral
proceedings shall continue from the stage already reached and on the basis of the evidence and
material already on record, and the arbitrator(s) appointed under this section shall be deemed to
have received the said evidence and material.(7)In the event of arbitrator(s) being appointed under
this section, the arbitral tribunal thus reconstituted shall be deemed to be in continuation of the
previously appointed arbitral tribunal.(8)It shall be open to the Court to impose actual or exemplary
costs upon any of the parties under this section.(9)An application filed under sub-section (5) shall
be disposed of by the Court as expeditiously as possible and endeavour shall be made to dispose of
the matter within a period of sixty days from the date of service of notice on the opposite party.]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 14
29B. [ Fast track procedure. [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.]
(1)Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the parties to an arbitration agreement, may, at
any stage either before or at the time of appointment of the arbitral tribunal, agree in writing to have
their dispute resolved by fast track procedure specified in sub-section (3).(2)The parties to the
arbitration agreement, while agreeing for resolution of dispute by fast track procedure, may agree
that the arbitral tribunal shall consist of a sole arbitrator who shall be chosen by the parties.(3)The
arbitral tribunal shall follow the following procedure while conducting arbitration proceedings
under sub-section (1):(a)The arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute on the basis of written
pleadings, documents and submissions filed by the parties without any oral hearing;(b)The arbitral
tribunal shall have power to call for any further information or clarification from the parties in
addition to the pleadings and documents filed by them;(c)An oral hearing may be held only, if, all
the parties make a request or if the arbitral tribunal considers it necessary to have oral hearing for
clarifying certain issues;(d)The arbitral tribunal may dispense with any technical formalities, if an
oral hearing is held, and adopt such procedure as deemed appropriate for expeditious disposal of
the case.(4)The award under this section shall be made within a period of six months from the date
the arbitral tribunal enters upon the reference.(5)If the award is not made within the period
specified in sub-section (4), the provisions of sub-sections (3) to (9) of section 29A shall apply to the
proceedings.(6)The fees payable to the arbitrator and the manner of payment of the fees shall be
such as may be agreed between the arbitrator and the parties.]
30. Settlement.
(1)It is not incompatible with an arbitration agreement for an arbitral tribunal to encourage
settlement of the dispute and, with the agreement of the parties, the arbitral tribunal may use
mediation, conciliation or other procedures at any time during the arbitral proceedings to encourage
settlement.(2)If, during arbitral proceedings, the parties settle the dispute, the arbitral tribunal shall
terminate the proceedings and if, requested by the parties and not objected to by the arbitral
tribunal, record the settlement in the form of an arbitral award on agreed terms.(3)An arbitral
award on agreed terms shall be made in accordance with section 31 and shall state that it is an
arbitral award.(4)An arbitral award on agreed terms shall have the same status and effect as any
other arbitral award on the substance of the dispute.
31. Form and contents of arbitral award.
(1)An arbitral award shall be made in writing and shall be signed by the members of the arbitral
tribunal.(2)For the purposes of sub-section (1), in arbitral proceedings with more than one
arbitrator, the signatures of the majority of all the members of the arbitral tribunal shall be
sufficient so long as the reason for any omitted signature is stated.(3)The arbitral award shall state
the reasons upon which it is based, unless(a)the parties have agreed that no reasons are to be given,
or(b)the award is an arbitral award on agreed terms under section 30.(4)The arbitral award shall
state its date and the place of arbitration as determined in accordance with section 20 and the award
shall be deemed to have been made at that place.(5)After the arbitral award is made, a signed copy
shall be delivered to each party.(6)The arbitral tribunal may, at any time during the arbitral
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 15
proceedings, make an interim arbitral award on any matter with respect to which it may make a
final arbitral award.(7)(a)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where and insofar as an arbitral
award is for the payment of money, the arbitral tribunal may include in the sum for which the award
is made interest, at such rate as it deems reasonable, on the whole or any part of the money, for the
whole or any part of the period between the date on which the cause of action arose and the date on
which the award is made.(b)[ A sum directed to be paid by an arbitral award shall, unless the award
otherwise directs, carry interest at the rate of two per cent. higher than the current rate of interest
prevalent on the date of award, from the date of award to the date of payment. [Substituted by Act
No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.](8)The costs of an arbitration shall be fixed by the arbitral tribunal
in accordance with section 31A.]Explanation. For the purpose of clause (a), costs means reasonable
costs relating to(i)the fees and expenses of the arbitrators and witnesses,(ii)legal fees and
expenses,(iii)any administration fees of the institution supervising the arbitration, and(iv)any other
expenses incurred in connection with the arbitral proceedings and the arbitral award.
31A. [ Regime for costs. [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.]
(1)In relation to any arbitration proceeding or a proceeding under any of the provisions of this Act
pertaining to the arbitration, the Court or arbitral tribunal, notwithstanding anything contained in
the Code of Civil Procedure,1908, shall have the discretion to determine-(a)whether costs are
payable by one party to another;(b)the amount of such costs; and(c)when such costs are to be
paid.Explanation. - For the purpose of this sub-section, "costs" means reasonable costs relating
to-(i)the fees and expenses of the arbitrators, Courts and witnesses;(ii)legal fees and
expenses;(iii)any administration fees of the institution supervising the arbitration; and(iv)any other
expenses incurred in connection with the arbitral or Court proceedings and the arbitral award.(2)If
the Court or arbitral tribunal decides to make an order as to payment of costs,-(a)the general rule is
that the unsuccessful party shall be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party; or(b)the Court
or arbitral tribunal may make a different order for reasons to be recorded in writing.(3)In
determining the costs, the Court or arbitral tribunal shall have regard to all the circumstances,
including-(a)the conduct of all the parties;(b)whether a party has succeeded partly in the
case;(c)whether the party had made a frivolous counter claim leading to delay in the disposal of the
arbitral proceedings; and(d)whether any reasonable offer to settle the dispute is made by a party
and refused by the other party.(4)The Court or arbitral tribunal may make any order under this
section including the order that a party shall pay-(a)a proportion of another party's costs;(b)a stated
amount in respect of another party's costs;(c)costs from or until a certain date only;(d)costs
incurred before proceedings have begun;(e)costs relating to particular steps taken in the
proceedings;(f)costs relating only to a distinct part of the proceedings; and(g)interest on costs from
or until a certain date.(5)An agreement which has the effect that a party is to pay the whole or part
of the costs of the arbitration in any event shall be only valid if such agreement is made after the
dispute in question has arisen.]
32. Termination of proceedings.
(1)The arbitral proceedings shall be terminated by the final arbitral award or by an order of the
arbitral tribunal under sub-section (2).(2)The arbitral tribunal shall issue an order for the
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 16
termination of the arbitral proceedings where(a)the claimant withdraws his claim, unless the
respondent objects to the order and the arbitral tribunal recognises a legitimate interest on his part
in obtaining a final settlement of the dispute,(b)the parties agree on the termination of the
proceedings, or(c)the arbitral tribunal finds that the continuation of the proceedings has for any
other reason become unnecessary or impossible.(3)Subject to section 33and sub-section (4) of
section 34, the mandate of the arbitral tribunal shall terminate with the termination of the arbitral
proceedings.
33. Correction and interpretation of award; additional award.
(1)Within thirty days from the receipt of the arbitral award, unless another period of time has been
agreed upon by the parties(a)a party, with notice to the other party, may request the arbitral
tribunal to correct any computation errors, any clerical or typographical errors or any other errors of
a similar nature occurring in the award;(b)if so agreed by the parties, a party, with notice to the
other party, may request the arbitral tribunal to give an interpretation of a specific point or part of
the award.(2)If the arbitral tribunal considers the request made under sub-section (1) to be justified,
it shall make the correction or give the interpretation within thirty days from the receipt of the
request and the interpretation shall form part of the arbitral award.(3)The arbitral tribunal may
correct any error of the type referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1), on its own initiative, within
thirty days from the date of the arbitral award.(4)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, a party
with notice to the other party, may request, within thirty days from the receipt of the arbitral award,
the arbitral tribunal to make an additional arbitral award as to claims presented in the arbitral
proceedings but omitted from the arbitral award.(5)If the arbitral tribunal considers the request
made under sub-section (4) to be justified, it shall make the additional arbitral award within sixty
days from the receipt of such request.(6)The arbitral tribunal may extend, if necessary, the period of
time within which it shall make a correction, give an interpretation or make an additional arbitral
award under sub-section (2) of sub-section (5).(7)Section 31 shall apply to a correction or
interpretation of the arbitral award or to an additional arbitral award made under this section.
Chapter VII
Recourse Against Arbitral Award
34. Application for setting aside arbitral award.
(1)Recourse to a Court against an arbitral award may be made only by an application for setting
aside such award in accordance with sub-section (2) and sub-section (3).(2)An arbitral award may
be set aside by the Court only if(a)the party making the application [establishes on the basis of the
record of the arbitral tribunal that:] [Substituted 'furnishes proof that' by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated
9.8.2019.](i)a party was under some incapacity; or(ii)the arbitration agreement is not valid under
the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law for the
time being in force; or(iii)the party making the application was not given proper notice of the
appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his
case; or(iv)the arbitral award deals with a dispute not contemplated by or not falling within the
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 17
terms of the submission to arbitration, or it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the
submission to arbitration:Provided that, if the decisions on matters submitted to arbitration can be
separated from those not so submitted, only that part of the arbitral award which contains decisions
on matters not submitted to arbitration may be set aside; or(v)the composition of the arbitral
tribunal or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, unless
such agreement was in conflict with a provision of this Part from which the parties cannot derogate,
or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance with this Part; or(b)the Court finds that(i)the
subject-matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the law for the time
being in force, or(ii)the arbitral award is in conflict with the public policy of India.[Explanation 1.
[Substituted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.] - For the avoidance of any doubt, it is clarified
that an award is in conflict with the public policy of India, only if,-(i)the making of the award was
induced or affected by fraud or corruption or was in violation of section 75 or section 81; or(ii)it is in
contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law; or(iii)it is in conflict with the most basic
notions of morality or justice.Explanation 2. - For the avoidance of doubt, the test as to whether
there is a contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law shall not entail a review on the
merits of the dispute.](2A)[ An arbitral award arising out of arbitration's other than international
commercial arbitration's, may also be set aside by the Court, if the Court finds that the award is
vitiated by patent illegality appearing on the face of the award: Provided that an award shall not be
set aside merely on the ground of an erroneous application of the law or by reappreciation of
evidence.] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.](3)An application for setting aside may
not be made after three months have elapsed from the date on which the party making that
application had received the arbitral award or, if a request had been made under section 33, from
the date on which that request had been disposed of by the arbitral tribunal:Provided that if the
Court is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application
within the said period of three months it may entertain the application within a further period of
thirty days, but not thereafter.(4)On receipt of an application under sub-section (1), the Court may,
where it is appropriate and it is so requested by a party, adjourn the proceedings for a period of time
determined by it in order to give the arbitral tribunal an opportunity to resume the arbitral
proceedings or to take such other action as in the opinion of arbitral tribunal will eliminate the
grounds for setting aside the arbitral award.(5)[ An application under this section shall be filed by a
party only after issuing a prior notice to the other party and such application shall be accompanied
by an affidavit by the applicant endorsing compliance with the said requirement.(6)An application
under this section shall be disposed of expeditiously, and in any event, within a period of one year
from the date on which the notice referred to in sub-section (5) is served upon the other party.]
[Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.]
Chapter VIII
Finality And Enforcement Of Arbitral Awards
35. Finality of arbitral awards.
- Subject to this Part an arbitral award shall be final and binding on the parties and persons claiming
under them respectively.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 18
36. [ Enforcement. [Substituted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.]
(1)Where the time for making an application to set aside the arbitral award under section 34 has
expired, then, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), such award shall be enforced in
accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in the same manner as if it
were a decree of the court.(2)Where an application to set aside the arbitral award has been filed in
the Court under section 34, the filing of such an application shall not by itself render that award
unenforceable, unless the Court grants an order of stay of the operation of the said arbitral award in
accordance with the provisions of sub-section (3), on a separate application made for that
purpose.(3)Upon filing of an application under sub-section (2) for stay of the operation of the
arbitral award, the Court may, subject to such conditions as it may deem fit, grant stay of the
operation of such award for reasons to be recorded in writing:Provided that the Court shall, while
considering the application for grant of stay in the case of an arbitral award for payment of money,
have due regard to the provisions for grant of stay of a money decree under the provisions of the
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.][Provided further that where the Court is satisfied that a prima facie
case is made out that, -(a)the arbitration agreement or contract which is the basis of the award;
or(b)the making of the award,was induced or effected by fraud or corruption, it shall stay the award
unconditionally pending disposal of the challenge under section 34 to the award.Explanation. - For
the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the above proviso shall apply to all court cases
arising out of or in relation to arbitral proceedings, irrespective of whether the arbitral or court
proceedings were commenced prior to or after the commencement of the Arbitration and
Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (3 of 2016).] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2021, dated 11.3.2021
(with effect from the 23rd day of October, 2015).]
36. Enforcement.- Where the time for making an application to set aside the arbitral award under
section 34 has expired, or such application having been made, it has been refused, the award shall
be enforced under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) in the same manner as if it were a
decree of the Court.
Chapter IX
Appeals
37. Appealable orders.
(1)[Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, an appeal]
[Substituted 'An appeal' by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.] shall lie from the following orders
(and from no others) to the Court authorised by law to hear appeals from original decrees of the
Court passing the order, namely:(a)[ refusing to refer the parties to arbitration under section 8;
[Substituted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.](b)granting or refusing to grant any measure
under section 9;(c)setting aside or refusing to set aside an arbitral award under section 34.](2)An
appeal shall also lie to a Court from an order of the arbitral tribunal(a)accepting the plea referred to
in sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) of section 16; or(b)granting or refusing to grant an interim
measure under section 17.(3)No second appeal shall lie from an order passed in appeal under this
section, but nothing in this section shall affect or take away any right to appeal to the Supreme
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 19
Court.
Chapter X
Miscellaneous
38. Deposits.
(1)The arbitral tribunal may fix the amount of the deposit or supplementary deposit, as the case may
be, as an advance for the costs referred to in sub-section (8) of section 31, which it expects will be
incurred in respect of the claim submitted to it:Provided that where, apart from the claim, a
counter-claim has been submitted to the arbitral tribunal, it may fix separate amount of deposit for
the claim and counter-claim.(2)The deposit referred to in sub-section (1) shall be payable in equal
shares by the parties:Provided that where one party fails to pay his share of the deposit, the other
party may pay that share:Provided further that where the other party also does not pay the aforesaid
share in respect of the claim or the counter-claim, the arbitral tribunal may suspend or terminate
the arbitral proceedings in respect of such claim or counter-claim, as the case may be.(3)Upon
termination of the arbitral proceedings, the arbitral tribunal shall render an accounting to the
parties of the deposits received and shall return any unexpended balance to the party or parties, as
the case may be.
39. Lien on arbitral award and deposits as to costs.
(1)Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2) and to any provision to the contrary in the arbitration
agreement, the arbitral tribunal shall have a lien on the arbitral award for any unpaid costs of the
arbitration.(2)If in any case an arbitral tribunal refuses to deliver its award except on payment of the
costs demanded by it, the Court may, on an application in this behalf, order that the arbitral tribunal
shall deliver the arbitral award to the applicant on payment into Court by the applicant of the costs
demanded, and shall, after such inquiry, if any, as it thinks fit, further order that out of the money so
paid into Court there shall be paid to the arbitral tribunal by way of costs such sum as the Court may
consider reasonable and that the balance of the money, if any, shall be refunded to the
applicant.(3)An application under sub-section (2) may be made by any party unless the fees
demanded have been fixed by written agreement between him and the arbitral tribunal, and the
arbitral tribunal shall be entitled to appear and be heard on any such application.(4)The Court may
make such orders as it thinks fit respecting the costs of the arbitration where any question arises
respecting such costs and the arbitral award contains no sufficient provision concerning them.
40. Arbitration agreement not to be discharged by death of party thereto.
(1)An arbitration agreement shall not be discharged by the death of any party thereto either as
respects the deceased or as respects any other party, but shall in such event be enforceable by or
against the legal representative of the deceased.(2)The mandate of an arbitrator shall not be
terminated by the death of any party by whom he was appointed.(3)Nothing in this section shall
affect the operation of any law by virtue of which any right of action is extinguished by the death of a
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 20
person.
41. Provisions in case of insolvency.
(1)Where it is provided by a term in a contract to which an insolvent is a party that any dispute
arising there out or in connection therewith shall be submitted to arbitration, the said term shall, if
the receiver adopts the contract, be enforceable by or against him so far as it relates to any such
dispute.(2)Where a person who has been adjudged an insolvent had, before the commencement of
the insolvency proceedings, become a party to an arbitration agreement, and any matter to which
the agreement applies is required to be determined in connection with, or for the purposes of, the
insolvency proceedings, then, if the case is one to which sub-section (1) does not apply, any other
party or the receiver may apply to the judicial authority having jurisdiction in the insolvency
proceedings for an order directing that the matter in question shall be submitted to arbitration in
accordance with the arbitration agreement, and the judicial authority may, if it is of opinion that,
having regard to all the circumstances of the case, the matter ought to be determined by arbitration,
make an order accordingly.(3)In this section the expression receiver includes an Official Assignee.
42. Jurisdiction.
- Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this Part or in any other law for the time being
in force, where with respect to an arbitration agreement any application under this Part has been
made in a Court, that Court alone shall have jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings and all
subsequent applications arising out of that agreement and the arbitral proceedings shall be made in
that Court and in no other Court.
42A. [ Confidentiality of information. [Inserted by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated
9.8.2019.]
- Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the arbitrator, the
arbitral institution and the parties to the arbitration agreement shall maintain confidentiality of all
arbitral proceedings except award where its disclosure is necessary for the purpose of
implementation and enforcement of award.]
42B. [ Protection of action taken in good faith. [Inserted by Act No. 33 of
2019, dated 9.8.2019.]
- No suit or other legal proceedings shall lie against the arbitrator for anything which is in good faith
done or intended to be done under this Act or the rules or regulations made thereunder.]
43. Limitations.
(1)The Limitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963), shall apply to arbitration's as it applies to proceedings in
Court.(2)For the purposes of this section and the Limitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963), an arbitration
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 21
shall be deemed to have commenced on the date referred in section 21.(3)Where an arbitration
agreement to submit future disputes to arbitration provides that any claim to which the agreement
applies shall be barred unless some step to commence arbitral proceedings is taken within a time
fixed by the agreement, and a dispute arises to which the agreement applies, the Court, if it is of
opinion that in the circumstances of the case undue hardship would otherwise be caused, and
notwithstanding that the time so fixed has expired, may on such terms, if any, as the justice of the
case may require, extend the time for such period as it thinks proper.(4)Where the Court orders that
an arbitral award be set aside, the period between the commencement of the arbitration and the
date of the order of the Court shall be excluded in computing the time prescribed by the Limitation
Act, 1963 (36 of 1963), for the commencement of the proceedings (including arbitration) with
respect to the dispute so submitted.[Part IA [Inserted by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.]
Arbitration Council of India
43A. Definitions.
- In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,�(a)"Chairperson" means the Chairperson of the
Arbitration Council of India appointed under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section
43C;(b)"Council" means the Arbitration Council of India established under section
43B;(c)"Member" means a Member of the Council and includes the Chairperson.
43B. Establishment and incorporation of Arbitration Council of India.
(1)The Central Government shall, by notification in the Official Gazette, establish, for the purposes
of this Act, a Council to be known as the Arbitration Council of India to perform the duties and
discharge the functions under this Act.(2)The Council shall be a body corporate by the name
aforesaid, having perpetual succession and a common seal, with power, subject to the provisions of
this Act, to acquire, hold and dispose of property, both movable and immovable, and to enter into
contract, and shall, by the said name, sue or be sued.(3)The head office of the Council shall be at
Delhi.(4)The Council may, with the prior approval of the Central Government, establish offices at
other places in India.
43C. Composition of Council.
(1)The Council shall consist of the following Members, namely:��(a)a person, who has been, a
Judge of the Supreme Court or, Chief Justice of a High Court or, a Judge of a High Court or an
eminent person, having special knowledge and experience in the conduct or administration of
arbitration, to be appointed by the Central Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of
India�Chairperson;(b)an eminent arbitration practitioner having substantial knowledge and
experience in institutional arbitration, both domestic and international, to be nominated by the
Central Government�Member;(c)an eminent academician having experience in research and
teaching in the field of arbitration and alternative dispute resolution laws, to be appointed by the
Central Government in consultation with the Chairperson�Member;(d)Secretary to the Government
of India in the Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice or his representative not
below the rank of Joint Secretary�Member, ex officio;(e)Secretary to the Government of India in the
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 22
Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance or his representative not below the rank of Joint
Secretary�Member, ex officio;(f)one representative of a recognised body of commerce and industry,
chosen on rotational basis by the Central Government�Part-time Member; and(g)Chief Executive
Officer-Member-Secretary, ex officio.(2)The Chairperson and Members of the Council, other than ex
officio Members, shall hold office as such, for a term of three years from the date on which they
enter upon their office:Provided that no Chairperson or Member, other than ex officio Member,
shall hold office as such after he has attained the age of seventy years in the case of Chairperson and
sixty-seven years in the case of Member.(3)The salaries, allowances and other terms and conditions
of the Chairperson and Members referred to in clauses (b) and (c) of sub-section (1) shall be such as
may be prescribed by the Central Government.(4)The Part-time Member shall be entitled to such
travelling and other allowances as may be prescribed by the Central Government.
43D. Duties and functions of Council.
(1)It shall be the duty of the Council to take all such measures as may be necessary to promote and
encourage arbitration, mediation, conciliation or other alternative dispute resolution mechanism
and for that purpose to frame policy and guidelines for the establishment, operation and
maintenance of uniform professional standards in respect of all matters relating to
arbitration.(2)For the purposes of performing the duties and discharging the functions under this
Act, the Council may�(a)frame policies governing the grading of arbitral institutions;(b)recognise
professional institutes providing accreditation of arbitrators;(c)review the grading of arbitral
institutions and arbitrators;(d)hold training, workshops and courses in the area of arbitration in
collaboration of law firms, law universities and arbitral institutes;(e)frame, review and update
norms to ensure satisfactory level of arbitration and conciliation;(f)act as a forum for exchange of
views and techniques to be adopted for creating a platform to make India a robust centre for
domestic and international arbitration and conciliation;(g)make recommendations to the Central
Government on various measures to be adopted to make provision for easy resolution of commercial
disputes;(h)promote institutional arbitration by strengthening arbitral institutions;(i)conduct
examination and training on various subjects relating to arbitration and conciliation and award
certificates thereof;(j)establish and maintain depository of arbitral awards made in India;(k)make
recommendations regarding personnel, training and infrastructure of arbitral institutions;
and(l)such other functions as may be decided by the Central Government.
43E. Vacancies, etc., not to invalidate proceedings of Council.
- No act or proceeding of the Council shall be invalid merely by reason of�(a)any vacancy or any
defect, in the constitution of the Council;(b)any defect in the appointment of a person acting as a
Member of the Council; or(c)any irregularity in the procedure of the Council not affecting the merits
of the case.
43F. Resignation of Members.
- The Chairperson or the Full-time or Part-time Member may, by notice in writing, under his hand
addressed to the Central Government, resign his office:Provided that the Chairperson or the
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 23
Full-time Member shall, unless he is permitted by the Central Government to relinquish his office
sooner, continue to hold office until the expiry of three months from the date of receipt of such
notice or until a person duly appointed as his successor enters upon his office or until the expiry of
his term of office, whichever is earlier.
43G. Removal of Member.
(1)The Central Government may, remove a Member from his office if he��(a)is an undischarged
insolvent; or(b)has engaged at any time (except Part-time Member), during his term of office, in any
paid employment; or(c)has been convicted of an offence which, in the opinion of the Central
Government, involves moral turpitude; or(d)has acquired such financial or other interest as is likely
to affect pre-judicially his functions as a Member; or(e)has so abused his position as to render his
continuance in office prejudicial to the public interest; or(f)has become physically or mentally
incapable of acting as a Member.(2)Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no
Member shall be removed from his office on the grounds specified in clauses (d) and (e) of that
sub-section unless the Supreme Court, on a reference being made to it in this behalf by the Central
Government, has, on an inquiry, held by it in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed
in this behalf by the Supreme Court, reported that the Member, ought on such ground or grounds to
be removed.
43H. Appointment of experts and constitution of Committees thereof.
- The Council may, appoint such experts and constitute such Committees of experts as it may
consider necessary to discharge its functions on such terms and conditions as may be specified by
the regulations.
43I. General norms for grading of arbitral institutions.
- The Council shall make grading of arbitral institutions on the basis of criteria relating to
infrastructure, quality and calibre of arbitrators, performance and compliance of time limits for
disposal of domestic or international commercial arbitrations, in such manner as may be specified
by the regulations.
43J. [ Norms for accreditation of arbitrators. [Substituted by Act No. 3 of
2021, dated 11.3.2021.]
- The qualifications, experience and norms for accreditation of arbitrators shall be such as may be
specified by the regulations.]
43K. Depository of awards.
- The Council shall maintain an electronic depository of arbitral awards made in India and such
other records related thereto in such manner as may be specified by the regulations.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 24
43L. Power to make regulations by Council.
- The Council may, in consultation with the Central Government, make regulations, consistent with
the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, for the discharge of its functions and
perform its duties under this Act.
43M. Chief Executive Officer.
(1)There shall be a Chief Executive Officer of the Council, who shall be responsible for day-to-day
administration of the Council.(2)The qualifications, appointment and other terms and conditions of
the service of the Chief Executive Officer shall be such as may be prescribed by the Central
Government.(3)The Chief Executive Officer shall discharge such functions and perform such duties
as may be specified by the regulations.(4)There shall be a Secretariat to the Council consisting of
such number of officers and employees as may be prescribed by the Central Government.(5)The
qualifications, appointment and other terms and conditions of the service of the employees and
other officers of the Council shall be such as may be prescribed by the Central Government.]
Part II – Enforcement Of Certain Foreign Awards
Chapter I
New York Convention Awards
44. Definition.
- In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, foreign award means an arbitral award on
differences between persons arising out of legal relationships, whether contractual or not,
considered as commercial under the law in force in India, made on or after the 11th day of October,
1960(a)in pursuance of an agreement in writing for arbitration to which the Convention set forth in
the First Schedule applies, and(b)in one of such territories as the Central Government, being
satisfied that reciprocal provisions have been made may, by notification in the Official Gazette,
declare to be territories to which the said Convention applies.
45. Power of judicial authority to refer parties to arbitration.
- Notwithstanding anything contained in Part I or in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), a
judicial authority, when seized of an action in a matter in respect of which the parties have made an
agreement referred to in section 44, shall, at the request of one of the parties or any person claiming
through or under him, refer the parties to arbitration, [unless it prima facie finds] [Substituted
'unless it finds' by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.] that the said agreement is null and void,
inoperative or incapable of being performed.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 25
46. When foreign award binding.
- Any foreign award which would be enforceable under this Chapter shall be treated as binding for
all purposes on the persons as between whom it was made, and may accordingly be relied on by any
of those persons by way of defence, set off or otherwise in any legal proceedings in India and any
references in this Chapter to enforcing a foreign award shall be construed as including references to
relying on an award.
47. Evidence.
(1)The party applying for the enforcement of a foreign award shall, at the time of the application,
produce before the Court(a)the original award or a copy thereof, duly authenticated in the manner
required by the law of the country in which it was made;(b)the original agreement for arbitration or
a duly certified copy thereof; and(c)such evidence as may be necessary to prove that the award is a
foreign award.(2)If the award or agreement to be produced under sub-section (1) is in a foreign
language, the party seeking to enforce the award shall produce a translation into English certified as
correct by a diplomatic or consular agent of the country to which that party belongs or certified as
correct in such other manner as may be sufficient according to the law in force in
India.[Explanation. [Substituted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.] - In this section and in the
sections following in this Chapter, "Court" means the High Court having original jurisdiction to
decide the questions forming the subject-matter of the arbitral award if the same had been the
subject matter of a suit on its original civil jurisdiction and in other cases, in the High Court having
jurisdiction to hear appeals from decrees of courts subordinate to such High Court.]
48. Conditions for enforcement of foreign awards.
(1)Enforcement of a foreign award may be refused, at the request of the party against whom it is
invoked, only if that party furnishes to the Court proof that(a)the parties to the agreement referred
to in section 44 were, under the law applicable to them, under some incapacity, or the said
agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication
thereon, under the law of the country where the award was made; or(b)the party against whom the
award is invoked was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitral
proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case; or(c)the award deals with a difference not
contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or it contains
decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration:Provided that, if the
decisions on matters submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, that
part of the award which contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration may be enforced;
or(d)the composition of the arbitral authority or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with
the agreement of the parties, or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance with the law of the
country where the arbitration took place;or(e)the award has not yet become binding on the parties,
or has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the
law of which, that award was made.(2)Enforcement of an arbitral award may also be refused if the
Court finds that(a)the subject-matter of the difference is not capable of settlement by arbitration
under the law of India; or(b)the enforcement of the award would be contrary to the public policy of
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 26
India.[Explanation 1. [Substituted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.] - For the avoidance of any
doubt, it is clarified that an award is in conflict with the public policy of India, only if,-(i)the making
of the award was induced or affected by fraud or corruption or was in violation of section 75 or
section 81; or(ii)it is in contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law; or(iii)it is in
conflict with the most basic notions of morality or justice.Explanation 2. - For the avoidance of
doubt, the test as to whether there is a contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law shall
not entail a review on the merits of the dispute.](3)If an application for the setting aside or
suspension of the award has been made to a competent authority referred to in clause (e) of
sub-section (1) the Court may, if it considers it proper, adjourn the decision on the enforcement of
the award and may also, on the application of the party claiming enforcement of the award, order
the other party to give suitable security.
49. Enforcement of foreign awards.
- Where the Court is satisfied that the foreign award is enforceable under this Chapter, the award
shall be deemed to be a decree of that Court.
50. Appealable orders.
(1)[Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, an appeal]
[Substituted 'An appeal' by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.] shall lie from the order refusing
to(a)refer the parties to arbitration under section 45;(b)enforce a foreign award under section 48,to
the Court authorised by law to hear appeals from such order.(2)No second appeal shall lie from an
order passed in appeal under this section, but nothing in this section shall affect or take away any
right to appeal to the Supreme Court.
51. Saving.
- Nothing in this Chapter shall prejudice any rights which any person would have had of enforcing in
India of any award or of availing himself in India of any award if this Chapter had not been enacted.
52. Chapter II not to apply.
- Chapter II of this Part shall not apply in relation to foreign awards to which this Chapter applies.
Chapter II
Geneva Convention Awards
53. Interpretation.
- In this Chapter foreign award means an arbitral award on differences relating to matters
considered as commercial under the law in force in India made after the 28th day of July, 1924,(a)in
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 27
pursuance of an agreement for arbitration to which the Protocol set forth in the Second Schedule
applies, and(b)between persons of whom one is subject to the jurisdiction of some one of such
Powers as the Central Government, being satisfied that reciprocal provisions have been made, may,
by notification in the Official Gazette, declare to be parties to the Convention set forth in the Third
Schedule, and of whom the other is subject to the jurisdiction of some other of the Powers aforesaid,
and(c)in one of such territories as the Central Government, being satisfied that reciprocal provisions
have been made, may, by like notification, declare to be territories to which the said Convention
applies,and for the purposes of this Chapter an award shall not be deemed to be final if any
proceedings for the purpose of contesting the validity of the award are pending in the country in
which it was made.
54. Power of judicial authority to refer parties to arbitration.
- Notwithstanding anything contained in Part I or in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of
1908.
), a judicial authority, on being seized of a dispute regarding a contract made between persons to
whom section 53 applies and including an arbitration agreement, whether referring to present or
future differences, which is valid under that section and capable of being carried into effect, shall
refer the parties on the application of either of them or any person claiming through or under him to
the decision of the arbitrators and such reference shall not prejudice the competence of the judicial
authority in case the agreement or the arbitration cannot proceed or becomes inoperative.
55. Foreign awards when binding.
- Any foreign award which would be enforceable under this Chapter shall be treated as binding for
all purposes on the persons as between whom it was made, and may accordingly be relied on by any
of those persons by way of defence, set off or otherwise in any legal proceedings in India and any
references in this Chapter to enforcing a foreign award shall be construed as including references to
relying on an award.
56. Evidence.
(1)The party applying for the enforcement of a foreign award shall, at the time of application,
produce before the Court(a)the original award or a copy thereof duly authenticated in the manner
required by the law of the country in which it was made;(b)evidence proving that the award has
become final; and(c)such evidence as may be necessary to prove that the conditions mentioned in
clauses (a)and (c) of sub-section (1) of section 57 are satisfied.(2)Where any document requiring to
be produced under sub-section (1) is in a foreign language, the party seeking to enforce the award
shall produce a translation into English certified as correct by a diplomatic or consular agent of the
country to which that party belongs or certified as correct in such other manner as may be sufficient
according to the law in force in India.Explanation 1. - In this section and all the following sections of
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 28
this Chapter, Court means the principal civil Court of original jurisdiction in a district, and includes
the High Court in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, having jurisdiction over the
subject-matter of the award if the same had been the subject-matter of a suit, but does not include
any civil Court of a grade inferior to such principal civil Court, or any Court of Small
Causes.[Explanation. [Substituted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.] - In this section and in the
sections following in this Chapter, "Court" means the High Court having original jurisdiction to
decide the questions forming the subject-matter of the arbitral award if the same had been the
subject matter of a suit on its original civil jurisdiction and in other cases, in the High Court having
jurisdiction to hear appeals from decrees of courts subordinate to such High Court.]
57. Conditions for enforcement of foreign awards.
(1)In order that a foreign award may be enforceable under this Chapter, it shall be necessary
that(a)the award has been made in pursuance of a submission to arbitration which is valid under the
law applicable thereto;(b)the subject-matter of the award is capable of settlement by arbitration
under the law of India;(c)the award has been made by the arbitral tribunal provided for in the
submission to arbitration or constituted in the manner agreed upon by the parties and in conformity
with the law governing the arbitration procedure;(d)the award has become final in the country in
which it has been made, in the sense that it will not be considered as such if it is open to opposition
or appeal or if it is proved that any proceedings for the purpose of contesting the validity of the
award are pending;(e)the enforcement of the award is not contrary to the public policy or the law of
India.[Explanation 1. [Substituted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.] - For the avoidance of any
doubt, it is clarified that an award is in conflict with the public policy of India, only if,-(i)the making
of the award was induced or affected by fraud or corruption or was in violation of section 75 or
section 81; or(ii)it is in contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law; or(iii)it is in
conflict with the most basic notions of morality or justice.Explanation 2. - For the avoidance of
doubt, the test as to whether there is a contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law shall
not entail a review on the merits of the dispute.](2)Even if the conditions laid down in sub-section
(1) are fulfilled, enforcement of the award shall be refused if the Court is satisfied that(a)the award
has been annulled in the country in which it was made;(b)the party against whom it is sought to use
the award was not given notice of the arbitration proceedings in sufficient time to enable him to
present his case; or that, being under a legal incapacity, he was not properly represented;(c)the
award does not deal with the differences contemplated by or falling within the terms of the
submission to arbitration or that it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the
submission to arbitration:Provided that if the award has not covered all the differences submitted to
the arbitral tribunal, the Court may, if it thinks fit, postpone such enforcement or grant it subject to
such guarantee as the Court may decide.(3)If the party against whom the award has been made
proves that under the law governing the arbitration procedure there is a ground, other than the
grounds referred to in clauses (a) and (c) of sub-section (1) and clauses (b) and (c) of sub-section (2)
entitling him to contest the validity of the award, the Court may, if it thinks fit, either refuse
enforcement of the award or adjourn the consideration thereof, giving such party a reasonable time
within which to have the award annulled by the competent tribunal.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 29
58. Enforcement of foreign awards.
- Where the Court is satisfied that the foreign award is enforceable under this Chapter, the award
shall be deemed to be a decree of the Court.
59. Appealable orders.
(1)An appeal shall lie from the order refusing(a)to refer the parties to arbitration under section 54;
and(b)to enforce a foreign award under section 57,to the Court authorised by law to hear appeals
from such order.(2)No second appeal shall lie from an order passed in appeal under this section, but
nothing in this section shall affect or take away any right to appeal to the Supreme Court.
60. Saving.
- Nothing in this Chapter shall prejudice any rights which any person would have had of enforcing in
India of any award or of availing himself in India of any award if this Chapter had not been enacted.
Part III – Conciliation
61. Application and scope.
(1)Save as otherwise provided by any law for the time being in force and unless the parties have
otherwise agreed, this Part shall apply to conciliation of disputes arising out of legal relationship,
whether contractual or not and to all proceedings relating thereto.(2)This Part shall not apply where
by virtue of any law for the time being in force certain disputes may not be submitted to conciliation.
62. Commencement of conciliation proceedings.
(1)The party initiating conciliation shall send to the other party a written invitation to conciliate
under this Part, briefly identifying the subject of the dispute.(2)Conciliation proceedings shall
commence when the other party accepts in writing the invitation to conciliate.(3)If the other party
rejects the invitation, there will be no conciliation proceedings.(4)If the party initiating conciliation
does not receive a reply within thirty days from the date on which he sends the invitation, or within
such other period of time as specified in the invitation, he may elect to treat this as a rejection of the
invitation to conciliate and if he so elects, he shall inform in writing the other party accordingly.
63. Number of conciliators.
(1)There shall be one conciliator unless the parties agree that there shall be two or three
conciliators.(2)Where there is more than one conciliator, they ought, as a general rule, to act jointly.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 30
64. Appointment of conciliators.
(1)Subject to sub-section (2),(a)in conciliation proceedings with one conciliator, the parties may
agree on the name of a sole conciliator;(b)in conciliation proceedings with two conciliators, each
party may appoint one conciliator;(c)in conciliation proceedings with three conciliators, each party
may appoint one conciliator and the parties may agree on the name of the third conciliator who shall
act as the presiding conciliator.(2)Parties may enlist the assistance of a suitable institution or person
in connection with the appointment of conciliators, and in particular,(a)a party may request such an
institution or person to recommend the names of suitable individuals to act as conciliator; or(b)the
parties may agree that the appointment of one or more conciliators be made directly by such an
institution or person:Provided that in recommending or appointing individuals to act as conciliator,
the institution or person shall have regard to such considerations as are likely to secure the
appointment of an independent and impartial conciliator and, with respect to sole or third
conciliator, shall take into account the advisability of appointing a conciliator of a nationality other
than the nationalities of the parties.
65. Submission of statements to conciliator.
(1)The conciliator, upon his appointment, may request each party to submit to him a brief written
statement describing the general nature of the dispute and the points at issue.Each party shall send
a copy of such statement to the other party.(2)The conciliator may request each party to submit to
him a further written statement of his position and the facts and grounds in support thereof,
supplemented by any documents and other evidence that such party deems appropriate. The party
shall send a copy of such statement, documents and other evidence to the other party.(3)At any
stage of the conciliation proceedings, the conciliator may request a party to submit to him such
additional information as he deems appropriate.Explanation. - In this section and all the following
sections of this Part, the term conciliator applies to a sole conciliator, two or three conciliators as the
case may be.
66. Conciliator not bound by certain enactments.
- The conciliator is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or the Indian
Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872).
67. Role of conciliator.
(1)The conciliator shall assist the parties in an independent and impartial manner in their attempt
to reach an amicable settlement of their dispute.(2)The conciliator shall be guided by principles of
objectivity, fairness and justice, giving consideration to, among other things, the rights and
obligations of the parties, the usages of the trade concerned and the circumstances surrounding the
dispute, including any previous business practices between the parties.(3)The conciliator may
conduct the conciliation proceedings in such a manner as he considers appropriate, taking into
account the circumstances of the case, the wishes the parties may express, including any request by
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 31
a party that the conciliator hear oral statements, and the need for a speedy settlement of the
dispute.(4)The conciliator may, at any stage of the conciliation proceedings, make proposals for a
settlement of the dispute. Such proposals need not be in writing and need not be accompanied by a
statement of the reasons therefor.
68. Administrative assistance.
- In order to facilitate the conduct of the conciliation proceedings, the parties, or the conciliator with
the consent of the parties, may arrange for administrative assistance by a suitable institution or
person.
69. Communication between conciliator and parties.
(1)The conciliator may invite the parties to meet him or may communicate with them orally or in
writing. He may meet or communicate with the parties together or with each of them
separately.(2)Unless the parties have agreed upon the place where meetings with the conciliator are
to be held, such place shall be determined by the conciliator, after consultation with the parties,
having regard to the circumstances of the conciliation proceedings.
70. Disclosure of information.
- When the conciliator receives factual information concerning the dispute from a party, he shall
disclose the substance of that information to the other party in order that the other party may have
the opportunity to present any explanation which he considers appropriate:Provided that when a
party gives any information to the conciliator subject to a specific condition that it be kept
confidential, the conciliator shall not disclose that information to the other party.
71. Co-operation of parties with conciliator.
- The parties shall in good faith co-operate with the conciliator and, in particular, shall endeavour to
comply with requests by the conciliator to submit written materials, provide evidence and attend
meetings.
72. Suggestions by parties for settlement of dispute.
- Each party may, on his own initiative or at the invitation of the conciliator, submit to the
conciliator suggestions for the settlement of the dispute.
73. Settlement agreement.
(1)When it appears to the conciliator that there exist elements of a settlement which may be
acceptable to the parties, he shall formulate the terms of a possible settlement and submit them to
the parties for their observations. After receiving the observations of the parties, the conciliator may
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 32
reformulate the terms of a possible settlement in the light of such observations.(2)If the parties
reach agreement on a settlement of the dispute, they may draw up and sign a written settlement
agreement. If requested by the parties, the conciliator may draw up, or assist the parties in drawing
up, the settlement agreement.(3)When the parties sign the settlement agreement, it shall be final
and binding on the parties and persons claiming under them respectively.(4)The conciliator shall
authenticate the settlement agreement and furnish a copy thereof to each of the parties.
74. Status and effect of settlement agreement.
- The settlement agreement shall have the same status and effect as if it is an arbitral award on
agreed terms on the substance of the dispute rendered by an arbitral tribunal under section 30.
75. Confidentiality.
- Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the conciliator
and the parties shall keep confidential all matters relating to the conciliation
proceedings.Confidentiality shall extend also to the settlement agreement, except where its
disclosure is necessary for purposes of implementation and enforcement.
76. Termination of conciliation proceedings.
- The conciliation proceedings shall be terminated(a)by the signing of the settlement agreement by
the parties on the date of the agreement; or(b)by a written declaration of the conciliator, after
consultation with the parties, to the effect that further efforts at conciliation are no longer justified,
on the date of the declaration; or(c)by a written declaration of the parties addressed to the
conciliator to the effect that the conciliation proceedings are terminated, on the date of the
declaration; or(d)by a written declaration of a party to the other party and the conciliator, if
appointed, to the effect that the conciliation proceedings are terminated, on the date of the
declaration.
77. Resort to arbitral or judicial proceedings.
- The parties shall not initiate, during the conciliation proceedings, any arbitral or judicial
proceedings in respect of a dispute that is the subject-matter of the conciliation proceedings except
that a party may initiate arbitral or judicial proceedings where, in his opinion, such proceedings are
necessary for preserving his rights.
78. Costs.
(1)Upon termination of the conciliation proceedings, the conciliator shall fix the costs of the
conciliation and give written notice thereof to the parties.(2)For the purpose of sub-section (1), costs
means reasonable costs relating to(a)the fee and expenses of the conciliator and witnesses requested
by the conciliator with the consent of the parties;(b)any expert advice requested by the conciliator
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 33
with the consent of the parties;(c)any assistance provided pursuant to clause (b)of sub-section (2) of
section 64 and section 68;(d)any other expenses incurred in connection with the conciliation
proceedings and the settlement agreement.(3)The costs shall be borne equally by the parties unless
the settlement agreement provides for a different apportionment. All other expenses incurred by a
party shall be borne by that party.
79. Deposits.
(1)The conciliator may direct each party to deposit an equal amount as an advance for the costs
referred to in sub-section (2) of section 78 which he expects will be incurred.(2)During the course of
the conciliation proceedings, the conciliator may direct supplementary deposits in an equal amount
from each party.(3)If the required deposits under sub-sections (1) and (2) are not paid in full by
both parties within thirty days, the conciliator may suspend the proceedings or may make a written
declaration of termination of the proceedings to the parties, effective on the date of that
declaration.(4)Upon termination of the conciliation proceedings, the conciliator shall render an
accounting to the parties of the deposits received and shall return any unexpended balance to the
parties.
80. Role of conciliator in other proceedings.
- Unless otherwise agreed by the parties,(a)the conciliator shall not act as an arbitrator or as a
representative or counsel of a party in any arbitral or judicial proceeding in respect of a dispute that
is the subject of the conciliation proceedings;(b)the conciliator shall not be presented by the parties
as a witness in any arbitral or judicial proceedings.
81. Admissibility of evidence in other proceedings.
- The parties shall not rely on or introduce as evidence in arbitral or judicial proceedings, whether or
not such proceedings relate to the dispute that is the subject of the conciliation proceedings,(a)views
expressed or suggestions made by the other party in respect of a possible settlement of the
dispute;(b)admissions made by the other party in the course of the conciliation
proceedings;(c)proposals made by the conciliator;(d)the fact that the other party had indicated his
willingness to accept a proposal for settlement made by the conciliator.
Part IV – Supplementary Provisions
82. Power of High Court to make rules.
- The High Court may make rules consistent with this Act as to all proceedings before the Court
under this Act.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 34
83. Removal of difficulties.
(1)If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the Central Government may,
by order published in the Official Gazette, make such provisions, not inconsistent with the
provisions of this Act as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for removing the
difficulty:Provided that no such order shall be made after the expiry of a period of two years from
the date of commencement of this Act.(2)Every order made under this section shall, as soon as may
be after it is made, be laid before each House of Parliament.
84. Power to make rules.
(1)The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out
the provisions of this Act.(2)Every rule made by the Central Government under this Act shall be laid,
as soon as may be, after it is made before each House of Parliament while it is in session, for a total
period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions,
and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions
aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the
rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no
effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without
prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule.
85. Repeal and saving.
(1)The Arbitration (Protocol and Convention)Act, 1937 (6 of 1937), the Arbitration Act, 1940 (10 of
1940) and the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 (45 of 1961) are hereby
repealed.(2)Notwithstanding such repeal,(a)the provisions of the said enactments shall apply in
relation to arbitral proceedings which commenced before this Act came into force unless otherwise
agreed by the parties but this Act shall apply in relation to arbitral proceedings which commenced
on or after this Act comes into force;(b)all rules made and notifications published, under the said
enactments shall, to the extent to which they are not repugnant to this Act, be deemed respectively
to have been made or issued under this Act.
86. Repeal of Ordinance 27 of 1996 and saving.
(1)The Arbitration and Conciliation (Third) Ordinance, 1996 (27 of 1996) is hereby
repealed.(2)Notwithstanding such repeal, any order, rule, notification or scheme made or anything
done or any action taken in pursuance of any provision of the said Ordinance shall be deemed to
have been made, done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this Act.
87. Effect of arbitral and related court proceedings commenced prior to 23rd
October, 2015. [Inserted by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 35
- Unless the parties otherwise agree, the amendments made to this Act by the Arbitration and
Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (3 of 2016) shall�(a)not apply to�(i)arbitral proceedings
commenced before the commencement of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015
(3 of 2016);(ii)court proceedings arising out of or in relation to such arbitral proceedings
irrespective of whether such court proceedings are commenced prior to or after the commencement
of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (3 of 2016);(b)apply only to arbitral
proceedings commenced on or after the commencement of the Arbitration and Conciliation
(Amendment) Act, 2015 (3 of 2016) and to court proceedings arising out of or in relation to such
arbitral proceedings.]The First Schedule See section 44) Convention on the Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Article I[On November 27, 2019, the Supreme Court
rendered a decision in Hindustan Construction Company v UOI (‘HCC Case’), which did away with
automatic stays. The petitioners (infrastructure companies) approached the Court, pointing that
they were being forced into insolvency even after the Indian Government and other
government-owned companies owed them over INR 6000 crores (approximately USD 850 million)
pursuant to various arbitral awards. They argued that they were disabled from recovering the money
due to the automatic stay provisions. In this case, the Court struck down Section 87 as
unconstitutional for being arbitrary and revived Section 26 of the 2015 Arbitration and conciliation
act. The Court noted that the automatic stay provision was a “double-whammy” for firms in favor of
whom arbitration awards were passed. Despite the arbitral award being in their favor, the creditors
were not able to enjoy the fruits of the same, as the principal amount would be automatically stayed
due to a Section 34 petition (challenging the award), which in turn takes years for final disposal. As
a consequence, the firm could become financially unhealthy and vulnerable to being declared
insolvent under the Indian Insolvency Code. This retrospective resurrection of an automatic stay
also results in payments already made under the amended Section 36 to award-creditors in a
situation of no-stay or conditional-stay now being reversed. Along with this absurdity, the Court
noted that, on average, about six years are spent in defending these challenges. This delay defeats
the very objective of the alternate dispute resolution system. The Supreme Court, therefore, brought
back the position laid down by the BCCI v Kochi case, thus providing award creditors the immediate
benefit of an award by way of security and not letting any automatic stay stymie the execution for
several years. (https:indiankanoon.org/doc/102230863/,
https:www.mondaq.com/india/trials-appeals-compensation/882124/hindustan-construction-company-limited-and-anr-v-union-of-india-and-ors)]
1. This Convention shall apply to the recognition and enforcement of arbitral
awards made in the territory of a State other than the State where the
recognition and enforcement of such awards are sought, and arising out of
differences between persons, whether physical or legal. It shall also apply to
arbitral awards not considered as domestic awards in the State where their
recognition and enforcement are sought.
2. The term arbitral awards shall include not only awards made by arbitrators
appointed for each case but also those made by permanent arbitral bodies to
which the parties have submitted.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 36
3. When signing, ratifying or acceding to this Convention, or notifying
extension under article X hereof, any State may on the basis of reciprocity
declare that it will apply the Convention to the recognition and enforcement
of awards made only in the territory of another Contracting State. It may also
declare that it will apply the Convention only to differences arising out of
legal relationships, whether contractual or not, which are considered as
commercial under the national law of the State making such declaration.
Article II
1. Each Contracting State shall recognise an agreement in writing under
which the parties undertake to submit to arbitration all or any differences
which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of defined
legal relationship, whether contractual or not, concerning a subject-matter
capable of settlement by arbitration.
2. The term agreement in writing shall include an arbitral clause in a contract
or an arbitration agreement, signed by the parties or contained in an
exchange of letters or telegrams.
3. The Court of a Contracting State, when seized of an action in a matter in
respect of which the parties have made an agreement within the meaning of
this article, shall, at the request of one of the parties, refer the parties to
arbitration, unless it finds that the said agreement is null and void,
inoperative and incapable of being performed.
Article IIIEach Contracting State shall recognize arbitral awards as binding and enforce them in
accordance with the rules of procedure of the territory where the award is relied upon, under the
conditions laid down in the following articles. There shall not be imposed substantially more
onerous conditions or higher fees or charges on the recognition or enforcement of arbitral awards to
which this Convention applies than are imposed on the recognition or enforcement of domestic
arbitral awards.Article IV
1. To obtain the recognition and enforcement mentioned in the preceding
article, the party applying for recognition and enforcement shall, at the time
of the application, supply:
(a)the duly authenticated original award or a duly certified copy thereof;(b)the original agreement
referred to in article II or a duly certified copy thereof.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 37
2. If the said award or agreement is not made in an official language of the
country in which the award is relied upon, the party applying for recognition
and enforcement of the award shall produce a translation of these
documents into such language. The translation shall be certified by an
official or sworn translator or by a diplomatic or consular agent.
Article V
1. Recognition and enforcement of the award may be refused, at the request
of the party against whom it is invoked, only if that party furnishes to the
competent authority where the recognition and enforcement is sought, proof
that
(a)the parties to the agreement referred to in article II were, under the law applicable to them, under
some incapacity, or the said agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected
it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law of the country where the award was made;
or(b)the party against whom the award is invoked was not given proper notice of the appointment of
the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case; or(c)the
award deals with a difference not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission
to arbitration, or it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration;
provided that, if the decisions on matters submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not
so submitted, that part of the award which contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration
may be recognised and enforced; or(d)the composition of the arbitral authority or the arbitral
procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, or, failing such agreement, was
not in accordance with the law of the country where the arbitration took place; or(e)the award has
not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority
of the country in which, or under the law of which, that award was made.
2. Recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award may also be refused if
the competent authority in the country where recognition and enforcement is
sought finds that
(a)the subject-matter of the difference is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the law of
that country; or(b)the recognition or enforcement of the award would be contrary to the public
policy of that country.Article VIIf an application for the setting aside or suspension of the award has
been made to a competent authority referred to in article V(1)(e), the authority before which the
award is sought to be relied upon may, if it considers it proper, adjourn the decision on the
enforcement of the award and may also, on the application of the party claiming enforcement of the
award, order the other party to give suitable security.Article VII
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 38
1. The provisions of the present Convention shall not affect the validity of
multilateral or bilateral agreements concerning the recognition and
enforcement of arbitral awards entered into by the Contracting States nor
deprive any interested party of any right he may have to avail himself of an
arbitral award in the manner and to the extent allowed by the law or the
treaties of the country where such award is sought to be relied upon.
2. The Ganeva Protocol on Arbitration Clauses of 1923 and the Ganeva
Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1927 shall cease
to have effect between Contracting States on their becoming bound and to
the extent that they become bound by this Convention.
Article VIII
1. This Convention shall be open until 31st December, 1958 for signature on
behalf of any Member of the United Nations and also on behalf of any other
State which is or hereafter becomes member of any specialised agency of
the United Nations, or which is or hereafter becomes a party to the Statute of
the International Court of Justice, or any other State to which an invitation
has been addressed by the General Assembly of the United Nations.
2. This Convention shall be ratified and the instrument of ratification shall be
deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
Article IX
1. This Convention shall be open for accession to all States referred to in
article VIII.
2. Accession shall be effected by the deposit of an instrument of accession
with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
Article X
1. Any State may, at the time of signature, ratification or accession, declare
that this Convention shall extend to all or any of the territories for the
international relations of which it is responsible. Such a declaration shall
take effect when the Convention enters into force for the State concerned.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 39
2. At any time thereafter any such extension shall be made by notification
addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and shall take
effect as from the ninetieth day after the day of receipt by the
Secretary-General of the United Nations of this notification, or as from the
date of entry into force of the Convention for the State concerned, whichever
is the later.
3. With respect to those territories to which this Convention is not extended
at the time of signature, ratification or accession, each State concerned shall
consider the possibility of taking the necessary steps in order to extend the
application of this Convention to such territories, subject, where necessary
for constitutional reasons, to the consent of the Governments of such
territories.
Article XIIn the case of a federal or non-unitary State, the following provisions shall apply:(a)with
respect of those articles of this Convention that come within the legislative jurisdiction of the federal
authority, the obligations of the federal Government shall to this extent be the same as those of
Contracting States which are not federal States;(b)with respect to those articles of this Convention
that come within the legislative jurisdiction of constituent States or provinces which are not, under
the constitutional system of the federation, bound to take legislative action, the federal Government
shall bring such articles with a favourable recommendation to the notice of the appropriate
authorities of constituent States or provinces at the earliest possible moment;(c)a federal State Party
to this Convention shall, at the request of any other Contracting State transmitted through the
Secretary-General of the United Nations, supply a statement of the law and practice of the
federation and its constituent units in regard to any particular provision of this Convention, showing
the extent to which effect has been given to that provision by legislative or other action.Article XII
1. This Convention shall come into force on the ninetieth day following the
date of deposit of the third instrument of ratification or accession.
2. For each State ratifying or acceding to this Convention after the deposit of
the third instrument of ratification or accession, this Convention shall enter
into force on the ninetieth day after deposit by such State of its instrument of
ratification or accession.
Article XIII
1. Any Contracting State may denounce this Convention by a written
notification to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Denunciation
shall take effect one year after the date of receipt of the notification by the
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 40
Secretary-General.
2. Any State which has made a declaration or notification under article X
may, at any time thereafter, by notification to the Secretary-General of the
United Nations, declare that this Convention shall cease to extend to the
territory concerned one year after the date of the receipt of the notification by
the Secretary-General.
3. This Convention shall continue to be applicable to arbitral awards in
respect of which recognition or enforcement proceedings have been
instituted before the denunciation takes effect.
Article XIVA Contracting State shall not be entitled to avail itself of the present Convention against
other Contracting States except to the extent that it is itself bound to apply the Convention.Article
XVThe Secretary-General of the United Nations shall notify the States contemplated in article VIII
of the following:(a)signatures and ratifications in accordance with article VIII;(b)accessions in
accordance with article IX;(c)declarations and notifications under articles I, X and XI;(d)the date
upon which this Convention enters into force in accordance with article XII;(e)denunciations and
notifications in accordance with article XIII.Article XVI
1. This Convention, of which the Chinese, English, French, Russian and
Spanish texts shall be equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of
the United Nations.
2. The Secretary-General of the United Nations shall transmit a certified copy
of this Convention to the States contemplated in article XIII.
The Second ScheduleSee section 53)Protocol on Arbitration ClausesThe undersigned being duly
authorised, declare that they accept, on behalf of the countries which they represent, the following
provisions:
1. Each of the Contracting States recognises the validity of an agreement
whether relating to existing or future differences between parties subject
respectively to the jurisdiction of different Contracting States by which the
parties to a contract agree to submit to arbitration all or any differences that
may arise in connection with such contract relating to commercial matters or
to any other matter capable of settlement by arbitration, whether or not the
arbitration is to take place in a country to whose jurisdiction none of the
parties is subject.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 41
Each Contracting State reserves the right to limit the obligation mentioned above to contracts which
are considered as commercial under its national law. Any Contracting State which avails itself of this
right will notify the Secretary-General of the League of Nations in order that the other Contracting
States may be so informed.
2. The arbitral procedure,
including the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal, shall be governed by the will of the parties and by
the law of the country in whose territory the arbitration takes place.The Contracting States agree to
facilitate all steps in the procedure which require to be taken in their own territories, in accordance
with the provisions of their law governing arbitral procedure applicable to existing differences.
3. Each Contracting State undertakes to ensure the execution by its
authorities and in accordance with the provisions of its national laws of
arbitral awards made in its own territory under the preceding articles.
4. The Tribunals of the Contracting Parties, on being seized of a dispute
regarding a contract made between persons to whom Article I applies and
including an Arbitration Agreement whether referring to present or future
differences which is valid in virtue of the said article and capable of being
carried into effect, shall refer the parties on the application of either of them
to the decision of the Arbitrators.
Such reference shall not prejudice the competence of the judicial tribunals in case the agreement or
the arbitration cannot proceed or becomes inoperative.
5. The present Protocol, which shall remain open for signature by all States,
shall be ratified. The ratification shall be deposited as soon as possible with
the Secretary-General of the League of Nations, who shall notify such
deposit to all the Signatory States.
6. The present Protocol will come into force as soon as two ratifications have
been deposited. Thereafter it will take effect, in the case of each Contracting
State, one month after the notification by the Secretary-General of the
deposit of its ratification.
7. The present Protocol may be denounced by any Contracting State on
giving one years notice. Deunciation shall be effected by a notification
addressed to the Secretary-General of the League, who will immediately
transmit copies of such notification to all the other Signatory States and
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 42
inform them of the date on which it was received.
The denunciation shall take effect one year after the date on which it was notified to the
Secretary-General, and shall operate only in respect of the notifying State.
8. The Contracting States may declare that their acceptance of the present
Protocol does not include any or all of the under-mentioned territories: that
is to say, their colonies, overseas possessions or territories, protectorates or
the territories over which they exercise a mandate.
The said States may subsequently adhere separately on behalf of any territory thus excluded. The
Secretary-General of the League of Nations shall be informed as soon as possible of such adhesions.
He shall notify such adhesions to all Signatory States. They will take effect one month after the
notification by the Secretary-General to all Signatory States.The Contracting States may also
denounce the Protocol separately on behalf of any of the territories referred to above. Article 7
applies to such denunciation.The Third ScheduleSeesection 53)Convention on the Execution of
Foreign Arbitral AwardsArticle 1.(1)In the territories of any High Contracting Party to which the
present Convention applies, an arbitral award made in pursuance of an agreement, whether relating
to existing or future differences (hereinafter called a submission to arbitration) covered by the
Protocol on Arbitration Clauses opened at Geneva on September 24th, 1923, shall be recognised as
binding and shall be enforced in accordance with the rules of the procedure of the territory where
the award is relied upon, provided that the said award has been made in a territory of one of the
High Contracting Parties to which the present Convention applies and between persons who are
subject to the jurisdiction of one of the High Contracting Parties.(2)To obtain such recognition or
enforcement, it shall, further, be necessary:(a)that the award has been made in pursuance of a
submission to arbitration which is valid under the law applicable thereto;(b)that the subject-matter
of the award is capable of settlement by arbitration under the law of the country in which the award
is sought to be relied upon;(c)that the award has been made by the Arbitral Tribunal provided for in
the submission to arbitration or constituted in the manner agreed upon by the parties and in
conformity with the law governing the arbitration procedure;(d)that the award has become final in
the country in which it has been made, in the sense that it will not be considered as such if it is open
to opposition, appeal or pourvoi en cessation (in the countries where such forms of procedure exist)
or if it is proved that any proceedings for the purpose of contesting the validity of the award are
pending;(e)that the recognition or enforcement of the award is not contrary to the public policy or to
the principles of the law of the country in which it is sought to be relied upon.Article 2.Even if the
conditions laid down in Article I hereof are fulfilled, recognition and enforcement of the award shall
be refused if the Court is satisfied:(a)that the award has been annulled in the country in which it was
made;(b)that the party against whom it is sought to use the award was not given notice of the
arbitration proceedings in sufficient time to enable him to present his case; or that, being under a
legal incapacity, he was not properly represented;(c)that the award does not deal with the
differences contemplated by or falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration or that it
contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration.If the award has not
covered all the questions submitted to the arbitral tribunal, the competent authority of the country
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 43
where recognition or enforcement of the award is sought can, if it thinks fit, postpone such
recognition or enforcement or grant it subject to such guarantee as that authority may decide.Article
3.If the party against whom the award has been made proves that, under the law governing the
arbitration procedure, there is a ground, other than the grounds referred to in Article 1(a) and (c),
and Article 2(b) and (c), entitling him to contest the validity of the award in a Court of Law, the
Court may, if it thinks fit, either refuse recognition or enforcement of the award or adjourn the
consideration thereof, giving such party a reasonable time within which to have the award annulled
by the competent tribunal.Article 4.The party relying upon an award or claiming its enforcement
must supply, in particular:(1)the original award or a copy thereof duly authenticated, according to
the requirements of the law of the country in which it was made;(2)documentary or other evidence
to prove that the award has become final, in the sense defined in Article 1(d), in the country in which
it was made;(3)when necessary, documentary or other evidence to prove that the conditions laid
down in Article 1, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2)(a) and (c), have been fulfilled.A translation of the
award and of the other documents mentioned in this Article into the official language of the country
where the award is sought to be relied upon may be demanded. Such translations must be certified
correct by a diplomatic or consular agent of the country to which the party who seeks to rely upon
the award belongs or by sworn translator of the country where the award is sought to be relied
upon.Article 5.The provisions of the above Articles shall not deprive any interested party of the right
of availing himself of an arbitral award in the manner and to the extent allowed by the law or the
treaties of the country where such award is sought to be relied upon.Article 6.The present
Convention applies only to arbitral awards made after the coming into force of the Protocol on
Arbitration Clauses opened at Geneva on September 24th, 1923.Article 7.The present Convention,
which will remain open to the signature of all the signatories of the Protocol of 1923 on Arbitration
Clauses, shall be ratified.It may be ratified only on behalf of those Members of the League of Nations
and Non-Member States on whose behalf the Protocol of 1923 shall have been ratified.Ratification
shall be deposited as soon as possible with the Secretary-General of the League of Nations, who will
notify such deposit to all the signatories.Article 8.The present Convention shall come into force
three months after it shall have been ratified on behalf of two High Contracting Parties. Thereafter,
it shall take effect, in the case of each High Contracting Party, three months after the deposit of the
ratification on its behalf with the Secretary-General of the League of Nations.Article 9.The present
Convention may be denounced on behalf of any Member of the League or Non-Member State.
Denunciation shall be notified in writing to the Secretary-General of the League of Nations, who will
immediately send a copy thereof, certified to be in conformity with the notifications, to all the other
Contracting Parties, at the same time informing them of the date on which he received it.The
denunciation shall come into force only in respect of the High Contracting Party which shall have
notified it and one year after such notification shall have reached the Secretary-General of the
League of Nations.The denunciation shall come into force only in respect of the High Contracting
Party which shall have notified it and one year after such notification shall have reached the
Secretary-General of the League of Nations.The denunciation of the Protocol on Arbitration Clauses
shall entail, ipso facto, the denunciation of the present Convention.Article 10.The present
Convention does not apply to the Colonies, Protectorates or Territories under suzerainty or mandate
of any High Contracting Party unless they are specially mentioned.The application of this
Convention to one or more of such Colonies, Protectorates or Territories to which the Protocol on
Arbitration Clauses opened at Geneva on September 24th, 1923, applies, can be effected at any time
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 44
by means of a declaration addressed to the Secretary-General of the League of Nations by one of the
High Contracting Parties.Such declaration shall take effect three months after the deposit
thereof.The High Contracting Parties can at any time denounce the Convention for all or any of the
Colonies, Protectorates or territories referred to above. Article 9 hereof applied to such
denunciation.Article 11.A certified copy of the present Convention shall be transmitted by the
Secretary-General of the League of Nations to every Member of the League of Nations and to every
Non-Member State which signs the same.[The Fourth Schedule] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016
dated 31.12.2015.][See section 11 (3A)] [Substituted 'See section 11 (14)' by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated
9.8.2019.]
Sum in dispute
Model
fee
Up to Rs. 5,00,000 Rs. 45,000
Above Rs. 5,00,000 and up to
Rs. 20,00,000
Rs. 45,000 plus 3.5 per cent. of the claim amount over
andabove Rs. 5,00,000
Above Rs. 20,00,000 and up
to Rs. 1,00,00,000
Rs. 97,500 plus 3 per cent. of the claim amount over
andabove Rs. 20,00,000
Above Rs. 1,00,00,000 and up
to Rs. 10,00,00,000
Rs. 3,37,500 plus 1 per cent. of the claim amount over
andabove Rs. 1,00,00,000
Above Rs. 10,00,00,000 and
Rs. 20,00,00,000
up to Rs. 12,37,500 plus 0.75 per cent. of the claim
amountover and above Rs. 1,00,00,000
Above Rs. 20,00,00,000
Rs. 19,87,500 plus 0. 5 per cent. of the claim amount over
andabove Rs. 20,00,00,000 with a ceiling of Rs. 30,00,000
Note. - In the event, the arbitral tribunal is a sole arbitrator, he shall be entitled to an additional
amount of twenty-five per cent. on the fee payable as per the table set out above.[The Fifth
Schedule] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.][See section 12 (1)(b)]The following
grounds give rise to justifiable doubts as to the independence or impartiality of
arbitrators:Arbitrator's relationship with the parties or counsel
1. The arbitrator is an employee, consultant, advisor or has any other past or
present business relationship with a party.
2. The arbitrator currently represents or advises one of the parties or an
affiliate of one of the parties.
3. The arbitrator currently represents the lawyer or law firm acting as counsel
for one of the parties.
4. The arbitrator is a lawyer in the same law firm which is representing one of
the parties.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 45
5. The arbitrator is a manager, director or part of the management, or has a
similar controlling influence, in an affiliate of one of the parties if the affiliate
is directly involved in the matters in dispute in the arbitration.
6. The arbitrator's law firm had a previous but terminated involvement in the
case without the arbitrator being involved himself or herself.
7. The arbitrator's law firm currently has a significant commercial
relationship with one of the parties or an affiliate of one of the parties.
8. The arbitrator regularly advises the appointing party or an affiliate of the
appointing party even though neither the arbitrator nor his or her firm derives
a significant financial income therefrom.
9. The arbitrator has a close family relationship with one of the parties and in
the case of companies with the persons in the management and controlling
the company.
10. A close family member of the arbitrator has a significant financial interest
in one of the parties or an affiliate of one of the parties.
11. The arbitrator is a legal representative of an entity that is a party in the
arbitration.
12. The arbitrator is a manager, director or part of the management, or has a
similar controlling influence in one of the parties.
13. The arbitrator has a significant financial interest in one of the parties or
the outcome of the case.
14. The arbitrator regularly advises the appointing party or an affiliate of the
appointing party, and the arbitrator or his or her firm derives a significant
financial income therefrom.
Relationship of the arbitrator to the dispute.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 46
15. The arbitrator has given legal advice or provided an expert opinion on the
dispute to a party or an affiliate of one of the parties.
16. The arbitrator has previous involvement in the case.
Arbitrator's direct or indirect interest in the dispute
17. The arbitrator holds shares, either directly or indirectly, in one of the
parties or an affiliate of one of the parties that is privately held.
18. A close family member of the arbitrator has a significant financial interest
in the outcome of the dispute.
19. The arbitrator or a close family member of the arbitrator has a close
relationship with a third party who may be liable to recourse on the part of
the unsuccessful party in the dispute.
Previous services for one of the parties or other involvement in the case
20. The arbitrator has within the past three years served as counsel for one
of the parties or an affiliate of one of the parties or has previously advised or
been consulted by the party or an affiliate of the party making the
appointment in an unrelated matter, but the arbitrator and the party or the
affiliate of the party have no ongoing relationship.
21. The arbitrator has within the past three years served as counsel against
one of the parties or an affiliate of one of the parties in an unrelated matter.
22. The arbitrator has within the past three years been appointed as arbitrator
on two or more occasions by one of the parties or an affiliate of one of the
parties.
23. The arbitrator's law firm has within the past three years acted for one of
the parties or an affiliate of one of the parties in an unrelated matter without
the involvement of the arbitrator.
24. The arbitrator currently serves, or has served within the past three years,
as arbitrator in another arbitration on a related issue involving one of the
parties or an affiliate of one of the parties.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 47
Relationship between an arbitrator and another arbitrator or counsel
25. The arbitrator and another arbitrator are lawyers in the same law firm.
26. The arbitrator was within the past three years a partner of, or otherwise
affiliated with, another arbitrator or any of the counsel in the same
arbitration.
27. A lawyer in the arbitrator's law firm is an arbitrator in another dispute
involving the same party or parties or an affiliate of one of the parties.
28. A close family member of the arbitrator is a partner or employee of the
law firm representing one of the parties, but is not assisting with the dispute.
29. The arbitrator has within the past three years received more than three
appointments by the same counsel or the same law firm.
Relationship between arbitrator and party and others involved in the arbitration
30. The arbitrator's law firm is currently acting adverse to one of the parties
or an affiliate of one of the parties.
31. The arbitrator had been associated within the past three years with a
party or an affiliate of one of the parties in a professional capacity, such as a
former employee or partner.
Other circumstances
32. The arbitrator holds shares, either directly or indirectly, which by reason
of number or denomination constitute a material holding in one of the parties
or an affiliate of one of the parties that is publicly listed.
33. The arbitrator holds a position in an arbitration institution with appointing
authority over the dispute.
34. The arbitrator is a manager, director or part of the management, or has a
similar controlling influence, in an affiliate of one of the parties, where the
affiliate is not directly involved in the matters in dispute in the arbitration.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 48
Explanation 1. - The term "close family member" refers to a spouse, sibling, child, parent or life
partner.Explanation 2. - The term "affiliate" encompasses all companies in one group of companies
including the parent company.Explanation 3. - For the removal of doubts, it is clarified that it may
be the practice in certain specific kinds of arbitration, such as maritime or commodities arbitration,
to draw arbitrators from a small, specialised pool. If in such fields it is the custom and practice for
parties frequently to appoint the same arbitrator in different cases, this is a relevant fact to be taken
into account while applying the rules set out above.[The Sixth Schedule] [Inserted by Act No. 3 of
2016 dated 31.12.2015.][See section 12 (1)(b)]Name:Contact Details:Prior Experience (Including
Experience With Arbitrations):Number Of Ongoing Arbitrations:Circumstances disclosing any past
or present relationship with or interest in any of the parties or in relation to the subject-matter in
dispute, whether financial, business, professional or other kind, which is likely to give rise to
justifiable doubts as to your Independence or Impartiality (List Out):Circumstances which are likely
to affect your ability to devote sufficient time to the arbitration and in particular your ability to
finish the entire arbitration within twelve months (list out):[The Seventh Schedule] [Inserted by Act
No. 3 of 2016 dated 31.12.2015.][See section 12 (5)]Arbitrator's relationship with the parties or
counsel
1. The arbitrator is an employee, consultant, advisor or has any other past or
present business relationship with a party.
2. The arbitrator currently represents or advises one of the parties or an
affiliate of one of the parties.
3. The arbitrator currently represents the lawyer or law firm acting as counsel
for one of the parties.
4. The arbitrator is a lawyer in the same law firm which is representing one of
the parties.
5. The arbitrator is a manager, director or part of the management, or has a
similar controlling influence, in an affiliate of one of the parties if the affiliate
is directly involved in the matters in dispute in the arbitration.
6. The arbitrator's law firm had a previous but terminated involvement in the
case without the arbitrator being involved himself or herself.
7. The arbitrator's law firm currently has a significant commercial
relationship with one of the parties or an affiliate of one of the parties.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 49
8. The arbitrator regularly advises the appointing party or an affiliate of the
appointing party even though neither the arbitrator nor his or her firm derives
a significant financial income therefrom.
9. The arbitrator has a close family relationship with one of the parties and in
the case of companies with the persons in the management and controlling
the company.
10. A close family member of the arbitrator has a significant financial interest
in one of the parties or an affiliate of one of the parties.
11. The arbitrator is a legal representative of an entity that is a party in the
arbitration.
12. The arbitrator is a manager, director or part of the management, or has a
similar controlling influence in one of the parties.
13. The arbitrator has a significant financial interest in one of the parties or
the outcome of the case.
14. The arbitrator regularly advises the appointing party or an affiliate of the
appointing party, and the arbitrator or his or her firm derives a significant
financial income therefrom.
Relationship of the arbitrator to the dispute
15. The arbitrator has given legal advice or provided an expert opinion on the
dispute to a party or an affiliate of one of the parties.
16. The arbitrator has previous involvement in the case.
Arbitrator's direct or indirect interest in the dispute
17. The arbitrator holds shares, either directly or indirectly, in one of the
parties or an affiliate of one of the parties that is privately held.
18. A close family member of the arbitrator has a significant financial interest
in the outcome of the dispute.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 50
19. The arbitrator or a close family member of the arbitrator has a close
relationship with a third party who may be liable to recourse on the part of
the unsuccessful party in the dispute.
Explanation 1. - The term "close family member" refers to a spouse, sibling, child, parent or life
partner.Explanation 2. - The term "affiliate" encompasses all companies in one group of companies
including the parent company.Explanation 3. - For the removal of doubts, it is clarified that it may
be the practice in certain specific kinds of arbitration, such as maritime or commodities arbitration,
to draw arbitrators from a small, specialised pool. If in such fields it is the custom and practice for
parties frequently to appoint the same arbitrator in different cases, this is a relevant fact to be taken
into account while applying the rules set out above.[***] [Omitted 'The Eighth Schedule' by Act No.
3 of 2021, dated 11.3.2021.]
[The Eighth Schedule] [Inserted by Act No. 33 of 2019, dated 9.8.2019.](See section
43J)Qualifications and Experience of ArbitratorA person shall not be qualified to be an arbitrator
unless he -(i) is an advocate within the meaning of the Advocates Act, 1961 (25 of 1961) having ten
years of practice experience as an advocate; or(ii) is a chartered accountant within the meaning of
the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (61 of 1949) having ten years of practice experience as a
chartered accountant; or(iii) is a cost accountant within the meaning of the Cost and Works
Accountants Act, 1959 (23 of 1959) having ten years of practice experience as a cost accountant;
or(iv) is a company secretary within the meaning of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 (56 of 1980)
having ten years of practice experience as a company secretary; or(v) has been an officer of the
Indian Legal Service; or(vi) has been an officer with law degree having ten years of experience in
the legal matters in the Government, Autonomous Body, Public Sector Undertaking or at a senior
level managerial position in private sector; or(vii) has been an officer with engineering degree
having ten years of experience as an engineer in the Government, Autonomous Body, Public Sector
Undertaking or at a senior level managerial position in private sector or self-employed; or(viii) has
been an officer having senior level experience of administration in the Central Government or State
Government or having experience of senior level management of a Public Sector Undertaking or a
Government company or a private company of repute;(ix) is a person, in any other case, having
educational qualification at degree level with ten years of experience in scientific or technical
stream in the fields of telecom, information technology, Intellectual Property Rights or other
specialised areas in the Government, Autonomous Body, Public Sector Undertaking or a senior level
managerial position in a private sector, as the case may be.General norms applicable to
Arbitrator(i) The arbitrator shall be a person of general reputation of fairness, integrity and capable
to apply objectivity in arriving at settlement of disputes;(ii) the arbitrator must be impartial and
neutral and avoid entering into any financial business or other relationship that is likely to affect
impartiality or might reasonably create an appearance of partiality or bias amongst the parties;(iii)
the arbitrator should not involve in any legal proceeding and avoid any potential conflict connected
with any dispute to be arbitrated by him;(iv) the arbitrator should not have been convicted of an
offence involving moral turpitude or economic offence;(v) the arbitrator shall be conversant with
the Constitution of India, principles of natural justice, equity, common and customary laws,
commercial laws, labour laws, law of torts, making and enforcing the arbitral awards;(vi) the
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 51
arbitrator should possess robust understanding of the domestic and international legal system on
arbitration and international best practices in regard thereto;(vii) the arbitrator should be able to
understand key elements of contractual obligations in civil and commercial disputes and be able to
apply legal principles to a situation under dispute and also to apply judicial decisions on a given
matter relating to arbitration; and(viii) the arbitrator should be capable of suggesting,
recommending or writing a reasoned and enforceable arbitral award in any dispute which comes
before him for adjudication.
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/179995519/ 52
Rules, notifications and orders under this Act
Listed from India Code. Each opens there.